Foodscape: A scoping review and a research agenda for food security-related studies.

Since 1995, the term 'foodscape', a contraction of food and landscape, has been used in various research addressing social and spatial disparities in public health and food systems. This article presents a scoping review of the literature examining how this term is employed and framed. We...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simon Vonthron, Coline Perrin, Christophe-Toussaint Soulard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233218
id doaj-f24f340f29cd46d79272c197fd21aa75
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f24f340f29cd46d79272c197fd21aa752021-03-03T21:47:02ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01155e023321810.1371/journal.pone.0233218Foodscape: A scoping review and a research agenda for food security-related studies.Simon VonthronColine PerrinChristophe-Toussaint SoulardSince 1995, the term 'foodscape', a contraction of food and landscape, has been used in various research addressing social and spatial disparities in public health and food systems. This article presents a scoping review of the literature examining how this term is employed and framed. We searched publications using the term foodscape in the Web of Science Core Collection, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases. Analyzing 140 publications, we highlight four approaches to the foodscape: (i) Spatial approaches use statistics and spatial analysis to characterize the diversity of urban foodscapes and their impacts on diet and health, at city or neighborhood scales. (ii) Social and cultural approaches at the same scales show that foodscapes are socially shaped and highlight structural inequalities by combining qualitative case studies and quantitative surveys of food procurement practices. (iii) Behavioral approaches generally focus on indoor micro-scales, showing how consumer perceptions of foodscapes explain and determine food behaviors and food education. (iv) Systemic approaches contest the global corporate food regime and promote local, ethical, and sustainable food networks. Thus, although spatial analysis was the first approach to foodscapes, sociocultural, behavioral and systemic approaches are becoming more common. In the spatial approach, the term 'foodscape' is synonymous with 'food environment'. In the three other approaches, 'foodscape' and 'food environment' are not synonymous. Scholars consider that the foodscape is not an environment external to individuals but a landscape including, perceived, and socially shaped by individuals and policies. They share a systemic way of thinking, considering culture and experience of food as key to improving our understanding of how food systems affect people. Foodscape studies principally address three issues: public health, social justice, and sustainability. The review concludes with a research agenda, arguing that people-based and place-based approaches need to be combined to tackle the complexity of the food-people-territory nexus.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233218
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Simon Vonthron
Coline Perrin
Christophe-Toussaint Soulard
spellingShingle Simon Vonthron
Coline Perrin
Christophe-Toussaint Soulard
Foodscape: A scoping review and a research agenda for food security-related studies.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Simon Vonthron
Coline Perrin
Christophe-Toussaint Soulard
author_sort Simon Vonthron
title Foodscape: A scoping review and a research agenda for food security-related studies.
title_short Foodscape: A scoping review and a research agenda for food security-related studies.
title_full Foodscape: A scoping review and a research agenda for food security-related studies.
title_fullStr Foodscape: A scoping review and a research agenda for food security-related studies.
title_full_unstemmed Foodscape: A scoping review and a research agenda for food security-related studies.
title_sort foodscape: a scoping review and a research agenda for food security-related studies.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Since 1995, the term 'foodscape', a contraction of food and landscape, has been used in various research addressing social and spatial disparities in public health and food systems. This article presents a scoping review of the literature examining how this term is employed and framed. We searched publications using the term foodscape in the Web of Science Core Collection, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases. Analyzing 140 publications, we highlight four approaches to the foodscape: (i) Spatial approaches use statistics and spatial analysis to characterize the diversity of urban foodscapes and their impacts on diet and health, at city or neighborhood scales. (ii) Social and cultural approaches at the same scales show that foodscapes are socially shaped and highlight structural inequalities by combining qualitative case studies and quantitative surveys of food procurement practices. (iii) Behavioral approaches generally focus on indoor micro-scales, showing how consumer perceptions of foodscapes explain and determine food behaviors and food education. (iv) Systemic approaches contest the global corporate food regime and promote local, ethical, and sustainable food networks. Thus, although spatial analysis was the first approach to foodscapes, sociocultural, behavioral and systemic approaches are becoming more common. In the spatial approach, the term 'foodscape' is synonymous with 'food environment'. In the three other approaches, 'foodscape' and 'food environment' are not synonymous. Scholars consider that the foodscape is not an environment external to individuals but a landscape including, perceived, and socially shaped by individuals and policies. They share a systemic way of thinking, considering culture and experience of food as key to improving our understanding of how food systems affect people. Foodscape studies principally address three issues: public health, social justice, and sustainability. The review concludes with a research agenda, arguing that people-based and place-based approaches need to be combined to tackle the complexity of the food-people-territory nexus.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233218
work_keys_str_mv AT simonvonthron foodscapeascopingreviewandaresearchagendaforfoodsecurityrelatedstudies
AT colineperrin foodscapeascopingreviewandaresearchagendaforfoodsecurityrelatedstudies
AT christophetoussaintsoulard foodscapeascopingreviewandaresearchagendaforfoodsecurityrelatedstudies
_version_ 1714815218657263616