The persuasive power of robot touch. Behavioral and evaluative consequences of non-functional touch from a robot.

The unique physical embodiment of robots enables physical contact between machines and humans. Since interpersonal touch research has demonstrated that touch has several positive behavioral (e.g., reduced stress, better immune functioning) as well as evaluative consequences (e.g., better evaluation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Hoffmann, Nicole C Krämer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249554
id doaj-f2453380f4304c799465eb3f4daffeea
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f2453380f4304c799465eb3f4daffeea2021-05-21T04:30:51ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01165e024955410.1371/journal.pone.0249554The persuasive power of robot touch. Behavioral and evaluative consequences of non-functional touch from a robot.Laura HoffmannNicole C KrämerThe unique physical embodiment of robots enables physical contact between machines and humans. Since interpersonal touch research has demonstrated that touch has several positive behavioral (e.g., reduced stress, better immune functioning) as well as evaluative consequences (e.g., better evaluation of the initiator of touch), the question arises whether touch from a humanoid robot, the body of which is somewhat similar to that of a human, can evoke similar effects. To answer this question, we conducted a between-subjects experiment in the laboratory with n = 48 students who encountered a humanoid robot (Softbank Robotics' NAO) that either did or did not touch their hand in a non-functional manner during a counseling conversation. The analyses of participants' behavior revealed that they mostly reacted by smiling and laughing. Furthermore, participants who were touched by the robot complied significantly more frequently with a request posed by the robot during conversation, and reported better feelings compared to those who were not touched. However, there were no effects of robot touch on subjective evaluations of the robot or on the interaction experience.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249554
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laura Hoffmann
Nicole C Krämer
spellingShingle Laura Hoffmann
Nicole C Krämer
The persuasive power of robot touch. Behavioral and evaluative consequences of non-functional touch from a robot.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Laura Hoffmann
Nicole C Krämer
author_sort Laura Hoffmann
title The persuasive power of robot touch. Behavioral and evaluative consequences of non-functional touch from a robot.
title_short The persuasive power of robot touch. Behavioral and evaluative consequences of non-functional touch from a robot.
title_full The persuasive power of robot touch. Behavioral and evaluative consequences of non-functional touch from a robot.
title_fullStr The persuasive power of robot touch. Behavioral and evaluative consequences of non-functional touch from a robot.
title_full_unstemmed The persuasive power of robot touch. Behavioral and evaluative consequences of non-functional touch from a robot.
title_sort persuasive power of robot touch. behavioral and evaluative consequences of non-functional touch from a robot.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description The unique physical embodiment of robots enables physical contact between machines and humans. Since interpersonal touch research has demonstrated that touch has several positive behavioral (e.g., reduced stress, better immune functioning) as well as evaluative consequences (e.g., better evaluation of the initiator of touch), the question arises whether touch from a humanoid robot, the body of which is somewhat similar to that of a human, can evoke similar effects. To answer this question, we conducted a between-subjects experiment in the laboratory with n = 48 students who encountered a humanoid robot (Softbank Robotics' NAO) that either did or did not touch their hand in a non-functional manner during a counseling conversation. The analyses of participants' behavior revealed that they mostly reacted by smiling and laughing. Furthermore, participants who were touched by the robot complied significantly more frequently with a request posed by the robot during conversation, and reported better feelings compared to those who were not touched. However, there were no effects of robot touch on subjective evaluations of the robot or on the interaction experience.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249554
work_keys_str_mv AT laurahoffmann thepersuasivepowerofrobottouchbehavioralandevaluativeconsequencesofnonfunctionaltouchfromarobot
AT nicoleckramer thepersuasivepowerofrobottouchbehavioralandevaluativeconsequencesofnonfunctionaltouchfromarobot
AT laurahoffmann persuasivepowerofrobottouchbehavioralandevaluativeconsequencesofnonfunctionaltouchfromarobot
AT nicoleckramer persuasivepowerofrobottouchbehavioralandevaluativeconsequencesofnonfunctionaltouchfromarobot
_version_ 1721432696001921024