The Interplay between Usability and Aesthetics: More Evidence for the “What Is Usable Is Beautiful” Notion
With respect to inconsistent findings on the interplay between usability and aesthetics, the current paper aimed to further examine the effect of these variables on perceived qualities of a mobile phone prototype. An experiment with four versions of the prototype varying on two factors, (1) usabilit...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2014-01-01
|
Series: | Advances in Human-Computer Interaction |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/946239 |
id |
doaj-f241977213394e09b3d2efaadb009ae4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f241977213394e09b3d2efaadb009ae42020-11-24T21:13:24ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in Human-Computer Interaction1687-58931687-59072014-01-01201410.1155/2014/946239946239The Interplay between Usability and Aesthetics: More Evidence for the “What Is Usable Is Beautiful” NotionKai-Christoph Hamborg0Julia Hülsmann1Kai Kaspar2Institute of Psychology, University of Osnabrück, Seminarstraße 20, 49074 Osnabrück, GermanyInstitute of Psychology, University of Osnabrück, Seminarstraße 20, 49074 Osnabrück, GermanySocial and Media Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Cologne, Richard-Strauss-Straße 2, 50931 Cologne, GermanyWith respect to inconsistent findings on the interplay between usability and aesthetics, the current paper aimed to further examine the effect of these variables on perceived qualities of a mobile phone prototype. An experiment with four versions of the prototype varying on two factors, (1) usability (high versus low) and (2) aesthetics (high versus low), was conducted with perceived usability and perceived beauty, as well as hedonic experience and the system’s appeal as dependent variables. Participants of the experiment (N=88) were instructed to complete four typical tasks with the prototype before assessing its quality. Results showed that the mobile phone’s aesthetics does not affect its perceived usability, either directly or indirectly. Instead, results revealed an effect of usability on perceived beauty, which supports the “what is usable is beautiful” notion instead of “what is beautiful is usable.” Furthermore, effects of aesthetics and of usability on hedonic experience in terms of endowing identity and appeal were found, indicating that both instrumental (usability) and noninstrumental (beauty) qualities contribute to a positive user experience.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/946239 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kai-Christoph Hamborg Julia Hülsmann Kai Kaspar |
spellingShingle |
Kai-Christoph Hamborg Julia Hülsmann Kai Kaspar The Interplay between Usability and Aesthetics: More Evidence for the “What Is Usable Is Beautiful” Notion Advances in Human-Computer Interaction |
author_facet |
Kai-Christoph Hamborg Julia Hülsmann Kai Kaspar |
author_sort |
Kai-Christoph Hamborg |
title |
The Interplay between Usability and Aesthetics: More Evidence for the “What Is Usable Is Beautiful” Notion |
title_short |
The Interplay between Usability and Aesthetics: More Evidence for the “What Is Usable Is Beautiful” Notion |
title_full |
The Interplay between Usability and Aesthetics: More Evidence for the “What Is Usable Is Beautiful” Notion |
title_fullStr |
The Interplay between Usability and Aesthetics: More Evidence for the “What Is Usable Is Beautiful” Notion |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Interplay between Usability and Aesthetics: More Evidence for the “What Is Usable Is Beautiful” Notion |
title_sort |
interplay between usability and aesthetics: more evidence for the “what is usable is beautiful” notion |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Advances in Human-Computer Interaction |
issn |
1687-5893 1687-5907 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
With respect to inconsistent findings on the interplay between usability and aesthetics, the current paper aimed to further examine the effect of these variables on perceived qualities of a mobile phone prototype. An experiment with four versions of the prototype varying on two factors, (1) usability (high versus low) and (2) aesthetics (high versus low), was conducted with perceived usability and perceived beauty, as well as hedonic experience and the system’s appeal as dependent variables. Participants of the experiment (N=88) were instructed to complete four typical tasks with the prototype before assessing its quality. Results showed that the mobile phone’s aesthetics does not affect its perceived usability, either directly or indirectly. Instead, results revealed an effect of usability on perceived beauty, which supports the “what is usable is beautiful” notion instead of “what is beautiful is usable.” Furthermore, effects of aesthetics and of usability on hedonic experience in terms of endowing identity and appeal were found, indicating that both instrumental (usability) and noninstrumental (beauty) qualities contribute to a positive user experience. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/946239 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kaichristophhamborg theinterplaybetweenusabilityandaestheticsmoreevidenceforthewhatisusableisbeautifulnotion AT juliahulsmann theinterplaybetweenusabilityandaestheticsmoreevidenceforthewhatisusableisbeautifulnotion AT kaikaspar theinterplaybetweenusabilityandaestheticsmoreevidenceforthewhatisusableisbeautifulnotion AT kaichristophhamborg interplaybetweenusabilityandaestheticsmoreevidenceforthewhatisusableisbeautifulnotion AT juliahulsmann interplaybetweenusabilityandaestheticsmoreevidenceforthewhatisusableisbeautifulnotion AT kaikaspar interplaybetweenusabilityandaestheticsmoreevidenceforthewhatisusableisbeautifulnotion |
_version_ |
1716749347279863808 |