The Interplay between Usability and Aesthetics: More Evidence for the “What Is Usable Is Beautiful” Notion

With respect to inconsistent findings on the interplay between usability and aesthetics, the current paper aimed to further examine the effect of these variables on perceived qualities of a mobile phone prototype. An experiment with four versions of the prototype varying on two factors, (1) usabilit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kai-Christoph Hamborg, Julia Hülsmann, Kai Kaspar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2014-01-01
Series:Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/946239
id doaj-f241977213394e09b3d2efaadb009ae4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f241977213394e09b3d2efaadb009ae42020-11-24T21:13:24ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in Human-Computer Interaction1687-58931687-59072014-01-01201410.1155/2014/946239946239The Interplay between Usability and Aesthetics: More Evidence for the “What Is Usable Is Beautiful” NotionKai-Christoph Hamborg0Julia Hülsmann1Kai Kaspar2Institute of Psychology, University of Osnabrück, Seminarstraße 20, 49074 Osnabrück, GermanyInstitute of Psychology, University of Osnabrück, Seminarstraße 20, 49074 Osnabrück, GermanySocial and Media Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Cologne, Richard-Strauss-Straße 2, 50931 Cologne, GermanyWith respect to inconsistent findings on the interplay between usability and aesthetics, the current paper aimed to further examine the effect of these variables on perceived qualities of a mobile phone prototype. An experiment with four versions of the prototype varying on two factors, (1) usability (high versus low) and (2) aesthetics (high versus low), was conducted with perceived usability and perceived beauty, as well as hedonic experience and the system’s appeal as dependent variables. Participants of the experiment (N=88) were instructed to complete four typical tasks with the prototype before assessing its quality. Results showed that the mobile phone’s aesthetics does not affect its perceived usability, either directly or indirectly. Instead, results revealed an effect of usability on perceived beauty, which supports the “what is usable is beautiful” notion instead of “what is beautiful is usable.” Furthermore, effects of aesthetics and of usability on hedonic experience in terms of endowing identity and appeal were found, indicating that both instrumental (usability) and noninstrumental (beauty) qualities contribute to a positive user experience.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/946239
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kai-Christoph Hamborg
Julia Hülsmann
Kai Kaspar
spellingShingle Kai-Christoph Hamborg
Julia Hülsmann
Kai Kaspar
The Interplay between Usability and Aesthetics: More Evidence for the “What Is Usable Is Beautiful” Notion
Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
author_facet Kai-Christoph Hamborg
Julia Hülsmann
Kai Kaspar
author_sort Kai-Christoph Hamborg
title The Interplay between Usability and Aesthetics: More Evidence for the “What Is Usable Is Beautiful” Notion
title_short The Interplay between Usability and Aesthetics: More Evidence for the “What Is Usable Is Beautiful” Notion
title_full The Interplay between Usability and Aesthetics: More Evidence for the “What Is Usable Is Beautiful” Notion
title_fullStr The Interplay between Usability and Aesthetics: More Evidence for the “What Is Usable Is Beautiful” Notion
title_full_unstemmed The Interplay between Usability and Aesthetics: More Evidence for the “What Is Usable Is Beautiful” Notion
title_sort interplay between usability and aesthetics: more evidence for the “what is usable is beautiful” notion
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
issn 1687-5893
1687-5907
publishDate 2014-01-01
description With respect to inconsistent findings on the interplay between usability and aesthetics, the current paper aimed to further examine the effect of these variables on perceived qualities of a mobile phone prototype. An experiment with four versions of the prototype varying on two factors, (1) usability (high versus low) and (2) aesthetics (high versus low), was conducted with perceived usability and perceived beauty, as well as hedonic experience and the system’s appeal as dependent variables. Participants of the experiment (N=88) were instructed to complete four typical tasks with the prototype before assessing its quality. Results showed that the mobile phone’s aesthetics does not affect its perceived usability, either directly or indirectly. Instead, results revealed an effect of usability on perceived beauty, which supports the “what is usable is beautiful” notion instead of “what is beautiful is usable.” Furthermore, effects of aesthetics and of usability on hedonic experience in terms of endowing identity and appeal were found, indicating that both instrumental (usability) and noninstrumental (beauty) qualities contribute to a positive user experience.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/946239
work_keys_str_mv AT kaichristophhamborg theinterplaybetweenusabilityandaestheticsmoreevidenceforthewhatisusableisbeautifulnotion
AT juliahulsmann theinterplaybetweenusabilityandaestheticsmoreevidenceforthewhatisusableisbeautifulnotion
AT kaikaspar theinterplaybetweenusabilityandaestheticsmoreevidenceforthewhatisusableisbeautifulnotion
AT kaichristophhamborg interplaybetweenusabilityandaestheticsmoreevidenceforthewhatisusableisbeautifulnotion
AT juliahulsmann interplaybetweenusabilityandaestheticsmoreevidenceforthewhatisusableisbeautifulnotion
AT kaikaspar interplaybetweenusabilityandaestheticsmoreevidenceforthewhatisusableisbeautifulnotion
_version_ 1716749347279863808