Epidemiology and Clinical Management of Fusarium keratitis in the Netherlands, 2005–2016
Introduction: Recognizing fungal keratitis based on the clinical presentation is challenging. Topical therapy may be initiated with antibacterial agents and corticosteroids, thus delaying the fungal diagnosis. As a consequence, the fungal infection may progress ultimately leading to more severe infe...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-04-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcimb.2020.00133/full |
id |
doaj-f237a2a93bd042d69bd03be3be60d608 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Claudy Oliveira dos Santos Claudy Oliveira dos Santos Claudy Oliveira dos Santos Eva Kolwijck Eva Kolwijck Jeroen van Rooij Remco Stoutenbeek Nienke Visser Yanny Y. Cheng Nathalie T. Y. Santana Paul E. Verweij Paul E. Verweij Cathrien A. Eggink |
spellingShingle |
Claudy Oliveira dos Santos Claudy Oliveira dos Santos Claudy Oliveira dos Santos Eva Kolwijck Eva Kolwijck Jeroen van Rooij Remco Stoutenbeek Nienke Visser Yanny Y. Cheng Nathalie T. Y. Santana Paul E. Verweij Paul E. Verweij Cathrien A. Eggink Epidemiology and Clinical Management of Fusarium keratitis in the Netherlands, 2005–2016 Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology fungal keratitis Fusarium susceptibility identification contact lenses visual outcome |
author_facet |
Claudy Oliveira dos Santos Claudy Oliveira dos Santos Claudy Oliveira dos Santos Eva Kolwijck Eva Kolwijck Jeroen van Rooij Remco Stoutenbeek Nienke Visser Yanny Y. Cheng Nathalie T. Y. Santana Paul E. Verweij Paul E. Verweij Cathrien A. Eggink |
author_sort |
Claudy Oliveira dos Santos |
title |
Epidemiology and Clinical Management of Fusarium keratitis in the Netherlands, 2005–2016 |
title_short |
Epidemiology and Clinical Management of Fusarium keratitis in the Netherlands, 2005–2016 |
title_full |
Epidemiology and Clinical Management of Fusarium keratitis in the Netherlands, 2005–2016 |
title_fullStr |
Epidemiology and Clinical Management of Fusarium keratitis in the Netherlands, 2005–2016 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Epidemiology and Clinical Management of Fusarium keratitis in the Netherlands, 2005–2016 |
title_sort |
epidemiology and clinical management of fusarium keratitis in the netherlands, 2005–2016 |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology |
issn |
2235-2988 |
publishDate |
2020-04-01 |
description |
Introduction: Recognizing fungal keratitis based on the clinical presentation is challenging. Topical therapy may be initiated with antibacterial agents and corticosteroids, thus delaying the fungal diagnosis. As a consequence, the fungal infection may progress ultimately leading to more severe infection and blindness. We noticed an increase of fungal keratitis cases in the Netherlands, especially caused by Fusarium species, which prompted us to conduct a retrospective cohort study, aiming to describe the epidemiology, clinical management, and outcome.Materials and Methods: As fungi are commonly sent to the Dutch mycology reference laboratory for identification and in vitro susceptibility testing, the fungal culture collection was searched for Fusarium isolates from corneal scrapings, corneal swabs, and from contact lens (CL) fluid, between 2005 and 2016. All Fusarium isolates had been identified up to species level through sequencing of the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region of the rDNA and TEF1 gene. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed according to the EUCAST microbroth dilution reference method. Antifungal agents tested included amphotericin B, voriconazole, and natamycin. In addition, susceptibility to the antisepticum chlorhexidine was tested. Ophthalmologists were approached to provide demographic and clinical data of patients identified through a positive culture.Results: Between 2005 and 2016, 89 cases of Fusarium keratitis from 16 different hospitals were identified. The number of cases of Fusarium keratitis showed a significant increase over time (R2 = 0.9199), with one case in the first 5 years (2005–2009) and multiple cases from 2010 and onwards. The male to female ratio was 1:3 (p = 0.014). Voriconazole was the most frequently used antifungal agent, but treatment strategies differed greatly between cases including five patients that were treated with chlorhexidine 0.02% monotherapy. Keratitis management was not successful in 27 (30%) patients, with 20 (22%) patients requiring corneal transplantation and seven (8%) requiring enucleation or evisceration. The mean visual acuity (VA) was moderately impaired with a logMAR of 0.8 (95% CI 0.6–1, Snellen equivalent 0.16) at the time of Fusarium culture. Final average VA was within the range of normal vision [logMAR 0.2 (95% CI 0.1–0.3), Snellen equivalent 0.63]. CL wear was reported in 92.9% of patients with Fusarium keratitis. The time between start of symptoms and diagnosis of fungal keratitis was significantly longer in patients with poor outcome as opposed to those with (partially) restored vision; 22 vs. 15 days, respectively (mean, p = 0.024). Enucleation/evisceration occurred in patients with delayed fungal diagnosis of more than 14 days after initial presentation of symptoms. The most frequently isolated species was F. oxysporum (24.7%) followed by F. solani sensu stricto (18%) and F. petroliphilum (9%). The lowest MICs were obtained with amphotericin B followed by natamycin, voriconazole, and chlorhexidine.Conclusion: Although Fusarium keratitis remains a rare complication of CL wear, we found a significant increase of cases in the Netherlands. The course of infection may be severe and fungal diagnosis was often delayed. Antifungal treatment strategies varied widely and the treatment failure rate was high, requiring transplantation or even enucleation. Our study underscores the need for systematic surveillance of fungal keratitis and a consensus management protocol. |
topic |
fungal keratitis Fusarium susceptibility identification contact lenses visual outcome |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcimb.2020.00133/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT claudyoliveiradossantos epidemiologyandclinicalmanagementoffusariumkeratitisinthenetherlands20052016 AT claudyoliveiradossantos epidemiologyandclinicalmanagementoffusariumkeratitisinthenetherlands20052016 AT claudyoliveiradossantos epidemiologyandclinicalmanagementoffusariumkeratitisinthenetherlands20052016 AT evakolwijck epidemiologyandclinicalmanagementoffusariumkeratitisinthenetherlands20052016 AT evakolwijck epidemiologyandclinicalmanagementoffusariumkeratitisinthenetherlands20052016 AT jeroenvanrooij epidemiologyandclinicalmanagementoffusariumkeratitisinthenetherlands20052016 AT remcostoutenbeek epidemiologyandclinicalmanagementoffusariumkeratitisinthenetherlands20052016 AT nienkevisser epidemiologyandclinicalmanagementoffusariumkeratitisinthenetherlands20052016 AT yannyycheng epidemiologyandclinicalmanagementoffusariumkeratitisinthenetherlands20052016 AT nathalietysantana epidemiologyandclinicalmanagementoffusariumkeratitisinthenetherlands20052016 AT pauleverweij epidemiologyandclinicalmanagementoffusariumkeratitisinthenetherlands20052016 AT pauleverweij epidemiologyandclinicalmanagementoffusariumkeratitisinthenetherlands20052016 AT cathrienaeggink epidemiologyandclinicalmanagementoffusariumkeratitisinthenetherlands20052016 |
_version_ |
1724797522516377600 |
spelling |
doaj-f237a2a93bd042d69bd03be3be60d6082020-11-25T02:36:59ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology2235-29882020-04-011010.3389/fcimb.2020.00133520272Epidemiology and Clinical Management of Fusarium keratitis in the Netherlands, 2005–2016Claudy Oliveira dos Santos0Claudy Oliveira dos Santos1Claudy Oliveira dos Santos2Eva Kolwijck3Eva Kolwijck4Jeroen van Rooij5Remco Stoutenbeek6Nienke Visser7Yanny Y. Cheng8Nathalie T. Y. Santana9Paul E. Verweij10Paul E. Verweij11Cathrien A. Eggink12Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, NetherlandsCentre of Expertise in Mycology Radboudumc/CWZ, Nijmegen, NetherlandsDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, NetherlandsDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, NetherlandsCentre of Expertise in Mycology Radboudumc/CWZ, Nijmegen, NetherlandsRotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, NetherlandsMaastricht University Medical Center+, University Eye Clinic, Maastricht, NetherlandsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, NetherlandsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, NetherlandsCentre of Expertise in Mycology Radboudumc/CWZ, Nijmegen, NetherlandsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, NetherlandsIntroduction: Recognizing fungal keratitis based on the clinical presentation is challenging. Topical therapy may be initiated with antibacterial agents and corticosteroids, thus delaying the fungal diagnosis. As a consequence, the fungal infection may progress ultimately leading to more severe infection and blindness. We noticed an increase of fungal keratitis cases in the Netherlands, especially caused by Fusarium species, which prompted us to conduct a retrospective cohort study, aiming to describe the epidemiology, clinical management, and outcome.Materials and Methods: As fungi are commonly sent to the Dutch mycology reference laboratory for identification and in vitro susceptibility testing, the fungal culture collection was searched for Fusarium isolates from corneal scrapings, corneal swabs, and from contact lens (CL) fluid, between 2005 and 2016. All Fusarium isolates had been identified up to species level through sequencing of the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region of the rDNA and TEF1 gene. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed according to the EUCAST microbroth dilution reference method. Antifungal agents tested included amphotericin B, voriconazole, and natamycin. In addition, susceptibility to the antisepticum chlorhexidine was tested. Ophthalmologists were approached to provide demographic and clinical data of patients identified through a positive culture.Results: Between 2005 and 2016, 89 cases of Fusarium keratitis from 16 different hospitals were identified. The number of cases of Fusarium keratitis showed a significant increase over time (R2 = 0.9199), with one case in the first 5 years (2005–2009) and multiple cases from 2010 and onwards. The male to female ratio was 1:3 (p = 0.014). Voriconazole was the most frequently used antifungal agent, but treatment strategies differed greatly between cases including five patients that were treated with chlorhexidine 0.02% monotherapy. Keratitis management was not successful in 27 (30%) patients, with 20 (22%) patients requiring corneal transplantation and seven (8%) requiring enucleation or evisceration. The mean visual acuity (VA) was moderately impaired with a logMAR of 0.8 (95% CI 0.6–1, Snellen equivalent 0.16) at the time of Fusarium culture. Final average VA was within the range of normal vision [logMAR 0.2 (95% CI 0.1–0.3), Snellen equivalent 0.63]. CL wear was reported in 92.9% of patients with Fusarium keratitis. The time between start of symptoms and diagnosis of fungal keratitis was significantly longer in patients with poor outcome as opposed to those with (partially) restored vision; 22 vs. 15 days, respectively (mean, p = 0.024). Enucleation/evisceration occurred in patients with delayed fungal diagnosis of more than 14 days after initial presentation of symptoms. The most frequently isolated species was F. oxysporum (24.7%) followed by F. solani sensu stricto (18%) and F. petroliphilum (9%). The lowest MICs were obtained with amphotericin B followed by natamycin, voriconazole, and chlorhexidine.Conclusion: Although Fusarium keratitis remains a rare complication of CL wear, we found a significant increase of cases in the Netherlands. The course of infection may be severe and fungal diagnosis was often delayed. Antifungal treatment strategies varied widely and the treatment failure rate was high, requiring transplantation or even enucleation. Our study underscores the need for systematic surveillance of fungal keratitis and a consensus management protocol.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcimb.2020.00133/fullfungal keratitisFusariumsusceptibilityidentificationcontact lensesvisual outcome |