A comparison of pre-school versus school-age orthoptic screening programmes in the North-East of England

'Aim: 'Following changes to the age at which our primary vision screening programmes are delivered we aimed to assess the impact of this change of practice on final vision outcomes. 'Methods: 'This is a retrospective notes review of visual outcomes of children failing from two pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michelle Dent, Caroline Fieldsend
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: White Rose University Press 2015-08-01
Series:British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.bioj-online.com/articles/90
id doaj-f2274fcda22d44d0bb3e7eb998d919cd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f2274fcda22d44d0bb3e7eb998d919cd2020-11-24T21:56:05ZengWhite Rose University PressBritish and Irish Orthoptic Journal2516-35902015-08-0112161910.22599/bioj.9089A comparison of pre-school versus school-age orthoptic screening programmes in the North-East of EnglandMichelle Dent0Caroline Fieldsend1Newcastle Eye Centre, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon TyneNewcastle Eye Centre, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne'Aim: 'Following changes to the age at which our primary vision screening programmes are delivered we aimed to assess the impact of this change of practice on final vision outcomes. 'Methods: 'This is a retrospective notes review of visual outcomes of children failing from two primary vision screening programmes: group A who were screened at pre-school age (3.5 years old) and group B who were screened at school entry age (4–5 years old). Results: Group A: coverage at screening 2742/4567 (60%), start visual acuity (VA) 0.516 logMAR (range 0.175–1.500), end VA 0.195 logMAR (range 0.00– 0.800). Group B: coverage at screening 5842/6082 (96%), start VA 0.514 logMAR (range 0.225–1.500), end VA 0.209 logMAR (range 0.00–1.200). Conclusion: Children in group B achieved the same visual outcome as group A in a shorter episode length and with a larger proportion of the target group screened.https://www.bioj-online.com/articles/90AmblyopiaPre-schoolSchoolVision screeningVisual outcomes
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michelle Dent
Caroline Fieldsend
spellingShingle Michelle Dent
Caroline Fieldsend
A comparison of pre-school versus school-age orthoptic screening programmes in the North-East of England
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
Amblyopia
Pre-school
School
Vision screening
Visual outcomes
author_facet Michelle Dent
Caroline Fieldsend
author_sort Michelle Dent
title A comparison of pre-school versus school-age orthoptic screening programmes in the North-East of England
title_short A comparison of pre-school versus school-age orthoptic screening programmes in the North-East of England
title_full A comparison of pre-school versus school-age orthoptic screening programmes in the North-East of England
title_fullStr A comparison of pre-school versus school-age orthoptic screening programmes in the North-East of England
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of pre-school versus school-age orthoptic screening programmes in the North-East of England
title_sort comparison of pre-school versus school-age orthoptic screening programmes in the north-east of england
publisher White Rose University Press
series British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
issn 2516-3590
publishDate 2015-08-01
description 'Aim: 'Following changes to the age at which our primary vision screening programmes are delivered we aimed to assess the impact of this change of practice on final vision outcomes. 'Methods: 'This is a retrospective notes review of visual outcomes of children failing from two primary vision screening programmes: group A who were screened at pre-school age (3.5 years old) and group B who were screened at school entry age (4–5 years old). Results: Group A: coverage at screening 2742/4567 (60%), start visual acuity (VA) 0.516 logMAR (range 0.175–1.500), end VA 0.195 logMAR (range 0.00– 0.800). Group B: coverage at screening 5842/6082 (96%), start VA 0.514 logMAR (range 0.225–1.500), end VA 0.209 logMAR (range 0.00–1.200). Conclusion: Children in group B achieved the same visual outcome as group A in a shorter episode length and with a larger proportion of the target group screened.
topic Amblyopia
Pre-school
School
Vision screening
Visual outcomes
url https://www.bioj-online.com/articles/90
work_keys_str_mv AT michelledent acomparisonofpreschoolversusschoolageorthopticscreeningprogrammesinthenortheastofengland
AT carolinefieldsend acomparisonofpreschoolversusschoolageorthopticscreeningprogrammesinthenortheastofengland
AT michelledent comparisonofpreschoolversusschoolageorthopticscreeningprogrammesinthenortheastofengland
AT carolinefieldsend comparisonofpreschoolversusschoolageorthopticscreeningprogrammesinthenortheastofengland
_version_ 1725859596149456896