A comparison of pre-school versus school-age orthoptic screening programmes in the North-East of England
'Aim: 'Following changes to the age at which our primary vision screening programmes are delivered we aimed to assess the impact of this change of practice on final vision outcomes. 'Methods: 'This is a retrospective notes review of visual outcomes of children failing from two pr...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
White Rose University Press
2015-08-01
|
Series: | British and Irish Orthoptic Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.bioj-online.com/articles/90 |
id |
doaj-f2274fcda22d44d0bb3e7eb998d919cd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f2274fcda22d44d0bb3e7eb998d919cd2020-11-24T21:56:05ZengWhite Rose University PressBritish and Irish Orthoptic Journal2516-35902015-08-0112161910.22599/bioj.9089A comparison of pre-school versus school-age orthoptic screening programmes in the North-East of EnglandMichelle Dent0Caroline Fieldsend1Newcastle Eye Centre, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon TyneNewcastle Eye Centre, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne'Aim: 'Following changes to the age at which our primary vision screening programmes are delivered we aimed to assess the impact of this change of practice on final vision outcomes. 'Methods: 'This is a retrospective notes review of visual outcomes of children failing from two primary vision screening programmes: group A who were screened at pre-school age (3.5 years old) and group B who were screened at school entry age (4–5 years old). Results: Group A: coverage at screening 2742/4567 (60%), start visual acuity (VA) 0.516 logMAR (range 0.175–1.500), end VA 0.195 logMAR (range 0.00– 0.800). Group B: coverage at screening 5842/6082 (96%), start VA 0.514 logMAR (range 0.225–1.500), end VA 0.209 logMAR (range 0.00–1.200). Conclusion: Children in group B achieved the same visual outcome as group A in a shorter episode length and with a larger proportion of the target group screened.https://www.bioj-online.com/articles/90AmblyopiaPre-schoolSchoolVision screeningVisual outcomes |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Michelle Dent Caroline Fieldsend |
spellingShingle |
Michelle Dent Caroline Fieldsend A comparison of pre-school versus school-age orthoptic screening programmes in the North-East of England British and Irish Orthoptic Journal Amblyopia Pre-school School Vision screening Visual outcomes |
author_facet |
Michelle Dent Caroline Fieldsend |
author_sort |
Michelle Dent |
title |
A comparison of pre-school versus school-age orthoptic screening programmes in the North-East of England |
title_short |
A comparison of pre-school versus school-age orthoptic screening programmes in the North-East of England |
title_full |
A comparison of pre-school versus school-age orthoptic screening programmes in the North-East of England |
title_fullStr |
A comparison of pre-school versus school-age orthoptic screening programmes in the North-East of England |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison of pre-school versus school-age orthoptic screening programmes in the North-East of England |
title_sort |
comparison of pre-school versus school-age orthoptic screening programmes in the north-east of england |
publisher |
White Rose University Press |
series |
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal |
issn |
2516-3590 |
publishDate |
2015-08-01 |
description |
'Aim: 'Following changes to the age at which our primary vision screening programmes are delivered we aimed to assess the impact of this change of practice on final vision outcomes. 'Methods: 'This is a retrospective notes review of visual outcomes of children failing from two primary vision screening programmes: group A who were screened at pre-school age (3.5 years old) and group B who were screened at school entry age (4–5 years old). Results: Group A: coverage at screening 2742/4567 (60%), start visual acuity (VA) 0.516 logMAR (range 0.175–1.500), end VA 0.195 logMAR (range 0.00– 0.800). Group B: coverage at screening 5842/6082 (96%), start VA 0.514 logMAR (range 0.225–1.500), end VA 0.209 logMAR (range 0.00–1.200). Conclusion: Children in group B achieved the same visual outcome as group A in a shorter episode length and with a larger proportion of the target group screened. |
topic |
Amblyopia Pre-school School Vision screening Visual outcomes |
url |
https://www.bioj-online.com/articles/90 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michelledent acomparisonofpreschoolversusschoolageorthopticscreeningprogrammesinthenortheastofengland AT carolinefieldsend acomparisonofpreschoolversusschoolageorthopticscreeningprogrammesinthenortheastofengland AT michelledent comparisonofpreschoolversusschoolageorthopticscreeningprogrammesinthenortheastofengland AT carolinefieldsend comparisonofpreschoolversusschoolageorthopticscreeningprogrammesinthenortheastofengland |
_version_ |
1725859596149456896 |