Automatic versus voluntary motor imitation: effect of visual context and stimulus velocity.

Automatic imitation is the tendency to reproduce observed actions involuntarily. Though this topic has been widely treated, at present little is known about the automatic imitation of the kinematic features of an observed movement. The present study was designed to understand if the kinematics of a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ambra Bisio, Natale Stucchi, Marco Jacono, Luciano Fadiga, Thierry Pozzo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2010-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2958128?pdf=render
id doaj-f2253d79648d4d9aa094aae736be853a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f2253d79648d4d9aa094aae736be853a2020-11-25T02:42:44ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032010-01-01510e1350610.1371/journal.pone.0013506Automatic versus voluntary motor imitation: effect of visual context and stimulus velocity.Ambra BisioNatale StucchiMarco JaconoLuciano FadigaThierry PozzoAutomatic imitation is the tendency to reproduce observed actions involuntarily. Though this topic has been widely treated, at present little is known about the automatic imitation of the kinematic features of an observed movement. The present study was designed to understand if the kinematics of a previously seen stimulus primes the executed action, and if this effect is sensitive to the kinds of stimuli presented. We proposed a simple imitation paradigm in which a dot or a human demonstrator moved in front of the participant who was instructed either to reach the final position of the stimulus or to imitate its motion with his or her right arm. Participants' movements were automatically contaminated by stimulus velocity when it moved according to biological laws, suggesting that automatic imitation was kinematic dependent. Despite that the performance, in term of reproduced velocity, improved in a context of voluntary imitation, subjects did not replicate the observed motions exactly. These effects were not affected by the kind of stimuli used, i.e., motor responses were influenced in the same manner after dot or human observation. These findings support the existence of low-level sensory-motor matching mechanisms that work on movement planning and represent the basis for higher levels of social interaction.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2958128?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ambra Bisio
Natale Stucchi
Marco Jacono
Luciano Fadiga
Thierry Pozzo
spellingShingle Ambra Bisio
Natale Stucchi
Marco Jacono
Luciano Fadiga
Thierry Pozzo
Automatic versus voluntary motor imitation: effect of visual context and stimulus velocity.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ambra Bisio
Natale Stucchi
Marco Jacono
Luciano Fadiga
Thierry Pozzo
author_sort Ambra Bisio
title Automatic versus voluntary motor imitation: effect of visual context and stimulus velocity.
title_short Automatic versus voluntary motor imitation: effect of visual context and stimulus velocity.
title_full Automatic versus voluntary motor imitation: effect of visual context and stimulus velocity.
title_fullStr Automatic versus voluntary motor imitation: effect of visual context and stimulus velocity.
title_full_unstemmed Automatic versus voluntary motor imitation: effect of visual context and stimulus velocity.
title_sort automatic versus voluntary motor imitation: effect of visual context and stimulus velocity.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2010-01-01
description Automatic imitation is the tendency to reproduce observed actions involuntarily. Though this topic has been widely treated, at present little is known about the automatic imitation of the kinematic features of an observed movement. The present study was designed to understand if the kinematics of a previously seen stimulus primes the executed action, and if this effect is sensitive to the kinds of stimuli presented. We proposed a simple imitation paradigm in which a dot or a human demonstrator moved in front of the participant who was instructed either to reach the final position of the stimulus or to imitate its motion with his or her right arm. Participants' movements were automatically contaminated by stimulus velocity when it moved according to biological laws, suggesting that automatic imitation was kinematic dependent. Despite that the performance, in term of reproduced velocity, improved in a context of voluntary imitation, subjects did not replicate the observed motions exactly. These effects were not affected by the kind of stimuli used, i.e., motor responses were influenced in the same manner after dot or human observation. These findings support the existence of low-level sensory-motor matching mechanisms that work on movement planning and represent the basis for higher levels of social interaction.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2958128?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT ambrabisio automaticversusvoluntarymotorimitationeffectofvisualcontextandstimulusvelocity
AT natalestucchi automaticversusvoluntarymotorimitationeffectofvisualcontextandstimulusvelocity
AT marcojacono automaticversusvoluntarymotorimitationeffectofvisualcontextandstimulusvelocity
AT lucianofadiga automaticversusvoluntarymotorimitationeffectofvisualcontextandstimulusvelocity
AT thierrypozzo automaticversusvoluntarymotorimitationeffectofvisualcontextandstimulusvelocity
_version_ 1724771821675347968