Automatic versus voluntary motor imitation: effect of visual context and stimulus velocity.
Automatic imitation is the tendency to reproduce observed actions involuntarily. Though this topic has been widely treated, at present little is known about the automatic imitation of the kinematic features of an observed movement. The present study was designed to understand if the kinematics of a...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2010-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2958128?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-f2253d79648d4d9aa094aae736be853a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f2253d79648d4d9aa094aae736be853a2020-11-25T02:42:44ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032010-01-01510e1350610.1371/journal.pone.0013506Automatic versus voluntary motor imitation: effect of visual context and stimulus velocity.Ambra BisioNatale StucchiMarco JaconoLuciano FadigaThierry PozzoAutomatic imitation is the tendency to reproduce observed actions involuntarily. Though this topic has been widely treated, at present little is known about the automatic imitation of the kinematic features of an observed movement. The present study was designed to understand if the kinematics of a previously seen stimulus primes the executed action, and if this effect is sensitive to the kinds of stimuli presented. We proposed a simple imitation paradigm in which a dot or a human demonstrator moved in front of the participant who was instructed either to reach the final position of the stimulus or to imitate its motion with his or her right arm. Participants' movements were automatically contaminated by stimulus velocity when it moved according to biological laws, suggesting that automatic imitation was kinematic dependent. Despite that the performance, in term of reproduced velocity, improved in a context of voluntary imitation, subjects did not replicate the observed motions exactly. These effects were not affected by the kind of stimuli used, i.e., motor responses were influenced in the same manner after dot or human observation. These findings support the existence of low-level sensory-motor matching mechanisms that work on movement planning and represent the basis for higher levels of social interaction.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2958128?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ambra Bisio Natale Stucchi Marco Jacono Luciano Fadiga Thierry Pozzo |
spellingShingle |
Ambra Bisio Natale Stucchi Marco Jacono Luciano Fadiga Thierry Pozzo Automatic versus voluntary motor imitation: effect of visual context and stimulus velocity. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Ambra Bisio Natale Stucchi Marco Jacono Luciano Fadiga Thierry Pozzo |
author_sort |
Ambra Bisio |
title |
Automatic versus voluntary motor imitation: effect of visual context and stimulus velocity. |
title_short |
Automatic versus voluntary motor imitation: effect of visual context and stimulus velocity. |
title_full |
Automatic versus voluntary motor imitation: effect of visual context and stimulus velocity. |
title_fullStr |
Automatic versus voluntary motor imitation: effect of visual context and stimulus velocity. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Automatic versus voluntary motor imitation: effect of visual context and stimulus velocity. |
title_sort |
automatic versus voluntary motor imitation: effect of visual context and stimulus velocity. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2010-01-01 |
description |
Automatic imitation is the tendency to reproduce observed actions involuntarily. Though this topic has been widely treated, at present little is known about the automatic imitation of the kinematic features of an observed movement. The present study was designed to understand if the kinematics of a previously seen stimulus primes the executed action, and if this effect is sensitive to the kinds of stimuli presented. We proposed a simple imitation paradigm in which a dot or a human demonstrator moved in front of the participant who was instructed either to reach the final position of the stimulus or to imitate its motion with his or her right arm. Participants' movements were automatically contaminated by stimulus velocity when it moved according to biological laws, suggesting that automatic imitation was kinematic dependent. Despite that the performance, in term of reproduced velocity, improved in a context of voluntary imitation, subjects did not replicate the observed motions exactly. These effects were not affected by the kind of stimuli used, i.e., motor responses were influenced in the same manner after dot or human observation. These findings support the existence of low-level sensory-motor matching mechanisms that work on movement planning and represent the basis for higher levels of social interaction. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2958128?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ambrabisio automaticversusvoluntarymotorimitationeffectofvisualcontextandstimulusvelocity AT natalestucchi automaticversusvoluntarymotorimitationeffectofvisualcontextandstimulusvelocity AT marcojacono automaticversusvoluntarymotorimitationeffectofvisualcontextandstimulusvelocity AT lucianofadiga automaticversusvoluntarymotorimitationeffectofvisualcontextandstimulusvelocity AT thierrypozzo automaticversusvoluntarymotorimitationeffectofvisualcontextandstimulusvelocity |
_version_ |
1724771821675347968 |