The response of stromatolites to seismic shocks: Tomboliths from the Palaeoproterozoic Chaibasa Formation, E India: Discussion and liquefaction basics

This discussion of a paper by Van Loon et al. (2016), published in the Journal of Palaeogeography (2016, 5(4), 381–390), is aimed at illustrating that there are fundamental deficiencies, which include (1) incomplete etymological reasoning for proposing a new genetic term “tomboliths” for stromatolit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: G. Shanmugam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2017-07-01
Series:Journal of Palaeogeography
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095383616300669
id doaj-f2223edcbf4c462dbc24daee9b283571
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f2223edcbf4c462dbc24daee9b2835712020-11-24T21:47:55ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Palaeogeography2095-38362017-07-016322423410.1016/j.jop.2016.12.001The response of stromatolites to seismic shocks: Tomboliths from the Palaeoproterozoic Chaibasa Formation, E India: Discussion and liquefaction basicsG. ShanmugamThis discussion of a paper by Van Loon et al. (2016), published in the Journal of Palaeogeography (2016, 5(4), 381–390), is aimed at illustrating that there are fundamental deficiencies, which include (1) incomplete etymological reasoning for proposing a new genetic term “tomboliths” for stromatolitic bioclasts in the Palaeoproterozoic Chaibasa Formation, eastern India, (2) omission of empirical data in documenting depositional facies using sedimentological logs, (3) misapplication of the stratigraphic concept of “angular unconformity”, (4) failure to consider the multifarious origins of earthquakes, and (5) a dated view on the basic tenets of process sedimentology and triggering mechanisms of liquefaction that are the basis for forming soft-sediment deformation structures (SSDS). As a consequence, their conclusions are unconvincing.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095383616300669Stromatolitic bioclastsSeismic shocksSoft-sediment deformation structures (SSDS)Palaeoproterozoic Chaibasa FormationSinghbhum CratonEastern India
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author G. Shanmugam
spellingShingle G. Shanmugam
The response of stromatolites to seismic shocks: Tomboliths from the Palaeoproterozoic Chaibasa Formation, E India: Discussion and liquefaction basics
Journal of Palaeogeography
Stromatolitic bioclasts
Seismic shocks
Soft-sediment deformation structures (SSDS)
Palaeoproterozoic Chaibasa Formation
Singhbhum Craton
Eastern India
author_facet G. Shanmugam
author_sort G. Shanmugam
title The response of stromatolites to seismic shocks: Tomboliths from the Palaeoproterozoic Chaibasa Formation, E India: Discussion and liquefaction basics
title_short The response of stromatolites to seismic shocks: Tomboliths from the Palaeoproterozoic Chaibasa Formation, E India: Discussion and liquefaction basics
title_full The response of stromatolites to seismic shocks: Tomboliths from the Palaeoproterozoic Chaibasa Formation, E India: Discussion and liquefaction basics
title_fullStr The response of stromatolites to seismic shocks: Tomboliths from the Palaeoproterozoic Chaibasa Formation, E India: Discussion and liquefaction basics
title_full_unstemmed The response of stromatolites to seismic shocks: Tomboliths from the Palaeoproterozoic Chaibasa Formation, E India: Discussion and liquefaction basics
title_sort response of stromatolites to seismic shocks: tomboliths from the palaeoproterozoic chaibasa formation, e india: discussion and liquefaction basics
publisher SpringerOpen
series Journal of Palaeogeography
issn 2095-3836
publishDate 2017-07-01
description This discussion of a paper by Van Loon et al. (2016), published in the Journal of Palaeogeography (2016, 5(4), 381–390), is aimed at illustrating that there are fundamental deficiencies, which include (1) incomplete etymological reasoning for proposing a new genetic term “tomboliths” for stromatolitic bioclasts in the Palaeoproterozoic Chaibasa Formation, eastern India, (2) omission of empirical data in documenting depositional facies using sedimentological logs, (3) misapplication of the stratigraphic concept of “angular unconformity”, (4) failure to consider the multifarious origins of earthquakes, and (5) a dated view on the basic tenets of process sedimentology and triggering mechanisms of liquefaction that are the basis for forming soft-sediment deformation structures (SSDS). As a consequence, their conclusions are unconvincing.
topic Stromatolitic bioclasts
Seismic shocks
Soft-sediment deformation structures (SSDS)
Palaeoproterozoic Chaibasa Formation
Singhbhum Craton
Eastern India
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095383616300669
work_keys_str_mv AT gshanmugam theresponseofstromatolitestoseismicshockstombolithsfromthepalaeoproterozoicchaibasaformationeindiadiscussionandliquefactionbasics
AT gshanmugam responseofstromatolitestoseismicshockstombolithsfromthepalaeoproterozoicchaibasaformationeindiadiscussionandliquefactionbasics
_version_ 1725894574674542592