Application of <i>k</i>-means and Gaussian mixture model for classification of seismic activities in Istanbul

Two unsupervised pattern recognition algorithms, <i>k</i>-means, and Gaussian mixture model (GMM) analyses have been applied to classify seismic events in the vicinity of Istanbul. Earthquakes, which are occurring at different seismicity rates and extensions of the Thrace-Eskisehir Fault...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. Dogan, G. Horasan, E. Yildirim, H. S. Kuyuk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2012-08-01
Series:Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
Online Access:http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/19/411/2012/npg-19-411-2012.pdf
id doaj-f214323339ce4e4a9824a57524745345
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f214323339ce4e4a9824a575247453452020-11-25T01:16:27ZengCopernicus PublicationsNonlinear Processes in Geophysics1023-58091607-79462012-08-0119441141910.5194/npg-19-411-2012Application of <i>k</i>-means and Gaussian mixture model for classification of seismic activities in IstanbulE. DoganG. HorasanE. YildirimH. S. KuyukTwo unsupervised pattern recognition algorithms, <i>k</i>-means, and Gaussian mixture model (GMM) analyses have been applied to classify seismic events in the vicinity of Istanbul. Earthquakes, which are occurring at different seismicity rates and extensions of the Thrace-Eskisehir Fault Zone and the North Anatolian Fault (NAF), Turkey, are being contaminated by quarries operated around Istanbul. We have used two time variant parameters, complexity, the ratio of integrated powers of the velocity seismogram, and S/P amplitude ratio as classifiers by using waveforms of 179 events (1.8 < <i>M</i> < 3.0). We have compared two algorithms with classical multivariate linear/quadratic discriminant analyses. The total accuracies of the models for GMM, <i>k</i>-means, linear discriminant function (LDF), and quadratic discriminant function (QDF) are 96.1%, 95.0%, 96.1%, 96.6%, respectively. The performances of models are discussed for earthquakes and quarry blasts separately. All methods clustered the seismic events acceptably where QDF slightly gave better improvements compared to others. We have found that unsupervised clustering algorithms, for which no a-prior target information is available, display a similar discriminatory power as supervised methods of discriminant analysis.http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/19/411/2012/npg-19-411-2012.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author E. Dogan
G. Horasan
E. Yildirim
H. S. Kuyuk
spellingShingle E. Dogan
G. Horasan
E. Yildirim
H. S. Kuyuk
Application of <i>k</i>-means and Gaussian mixture model for classification of seismic activities in Istanbul
Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
author_facet E. Dogan
G. Horasan
E. Yildirim
H. S. Kuyuk
author_sort E. Dogan
title Application of <i>k</i>-means and Gaussian mixture model for classification of seismic activities in Istanbul
title_short Application of <i>k</i>-means and Gaussian mixture model for classification of seismic activities in Istanbul
title_full Application of <i>k</i>-means and Gaussian mixture model for classification of seismic activities in Istanbul
title_fullStr Application of <i>k</i>-means and Gaussian mixture model for classification of seismic activities in Istanbul
title_full_unstemmed Application of <i>k</i>-means and Gaussian mixture model for classification of seismic activities in Istanbul
title_sort application of <i>k</i>-means and gaussian mixture model for classification of seismic activities in istanbul
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
issn 1023-5809
1607-7946
publishDate 2012-08-01
description Two unsupervised pattern recognition algorithms, <i>k</i>-means, and Gaussian mixture model (GMM) analyses have been applied to classify seismic events in the vicinity of Istanbul. Earthquakes, which are occurring at different seismicity rates and extensions of the Thrace-Eskisehir Fault Zone and the North Anatolian Fault (NAF), Turkey, are being contaminated by quarries operated around Istanbul. We have used two time variant parameters, complexity, the ratio of integrated powers of the velocity seismogram, and S/P amplitude ratio as classifiers by using waveforms of 179 events (1.8 < <i>M</i> < 3.0). We have compared two algorithms with classical multivariate linear/quadratic discriminant analyses. The total accuracies of the models for GMM, <i>k</i>-means, linear discriminant function (LDF), and quadratic discriminant function (QDF) are 96.1%, 95.0%, 96.1%, 96.6%, respectively. The performances of models are discussed for earthquakes and quarry blasts separately. All methods clustered the seismic events acceptably where QDF slightly gave better improvements compared to others. We have found that unsupervised clustering algorithms, for which no a-prior target information is available, display a similar discriminatory power as supervised methods of discriminant analysis.
url http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/19/411/2012/npg-19-411-2012.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT edogan applicationofikimeansandgaussianmixturemodelforclassificationofseismicactivitiesinistanbul
AT ghorasan applicationofikimeansandgaussianmixturemodelforclassificationofseismicactivitiesinistanbul
AT eyildirim applicationofikimeansandgaussianmixturemodelforclassificationofseismicactivitiesinistanbul
AT hskuyuk applicationofikimeansandgaussianmixturemodelforclassificationofseismicactivitiesinistanbul
_version_ 1725149822476877824