USING A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF INSTITUTIONAL CULTURE TO ANALYSE AN INSTITUTIONAL STRATEGY DOCUMENT

<p><em>This paper builds on a conceptual analysis of institutional culture in higher education. A theoretical framework was proposed to analyse institutional documents of two higher education institutions in the Western Cape, for the period 2002 to 2012 (Jacobs 2012). The elements of thi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anthea Hydi Jacobs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Unisa Press 2016-07-01
Series:Education as Change
Subjects:
Online Access:https://upjournals.co.za/index.php/EAC/article/view/944
id doaj-f20629cd18c647fb87dbd72a15867761
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f20629cd18c647fb87dbd72a158677612020-11-24T20:46:22ZengUnisa PressEducation as Change1682-32061947-94172016-07-01202204220429USING A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF INSTITUTIONAL CULTURE TO ANALYSE AN INSTITUTIONAL STRATEGY DOCUMENTAnthea Hydi Jacobs0STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY, CENTRE FOR TEACHING AND LEARNINGPRIVATE BAG X1 STELLENBOSCH, WESTERN CAPE, 7602, ZA +27 21 808 9258+27 21 808 9258 DR PO Box 840KUILS RIVER, WESTERN CAPE, 7579, ZA +27 82 462 2281+27 82 462 2281<p><em>This paper builds on a conceptual analysis of institutional culture in higher education. A theoretical framework was proposed to analyse institutional documents of two higher education institutions in the Western Cape, for the period 2002 to 2012 (Jacobs 2012). The elements of this theoretical framework are ‘shared values and beliefs’, ‘language’, ‘symbols’ and ‘knowledge production’. Even though the larger study focused on two higher education institutions, the focus in this paper is only on Stellenbosch University (SU). The aim of the paper is to explore how the constitutive elements of the proposed theoretical framework are constructed in the Institutional Intent and Strategy 2013-2018 document of SU. The findings of the larger 2012 study suggested a missing link between transformation and institutional culture. Although SU is striving towards an inclusive campus or institutional culture, the contention is that transformation extends far deeper. The current analysis reveals that the challenges SU is facing are two-fold. Firstly, the university has to make sure that the proposed ‘core processes’ represent significant actions to address the challenges related to transforming the university’s institutional culture. Secondly, SU should guard against the use of concepts such as ‘redesign’ to imply transformation.</em></p>https://upjournals.co.za/index.php/EAC/article/view/944Constitutive meaninghigher educationinstitutional culturetheoretical frameworktransformation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anthea Hydi Jacobs
spellingShingle Anthea Hydi Jacobs
USING A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF INSTITUTIONAL CULTURE TO ANALYSE AN INSTITUTIONAL STRATEGY DOCUMENT
Education as Change
Constitutive meaning
higher education
institutional culture
theoretical framework
transformation
author_facet Anthea Hydi Jacobs
author_sort Anthea Hydi Jacobs
title USING A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF INSTITUTIONAL CULTURE TO ANALYSE AN INSTITUTIONAL STRATEGY DOCUMENT
title_short USING A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF INSTITUTIONAL CULTURE TO ANALYSE AN INSTITUTIONAL STRATEGY DOCUMENT
title_full USING A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF INSTITUTIONAL CULTURE TO ANALYSE AN INSTITUTIONAL STRATEGY DOCUMENT
title_fullStr USING A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF INSTITUTIONAL CULTURE TO ANALYSE AN INSTITUTIONAL STRATEGY DOCUMENT
title_full_unstemmed USING A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF INSTITUTIONAL CULTURE TO ANALYSE AN INSTITUTIONAL STRATEGY DOCUMENT
title_sort using a theoretical framework of institutional culture to analyse an institutional strategy document
publisher Unisa Press
series Education as Change
issn 1682-3206
1947-9417
publishDate 2016-07-01
description <p><em>This paper builds on a conceptual analysis of institutional culture in higher education. A theoretical framework was proposed to analyse institutional documents of two higher education institutions in the Western Cape, for the period 2002 to 2012 (Jacobs 2012). The elements of this theoretical framework are ‘shared values and beliefs’, ‘language’, ‘symbols’ and ‘knowledge production’. Even though the larger study focused on two higher education institutions, the focus in this paper is only on Stellenbosch University (SU). The aim of the paper is to explore how the constitutive elements of the proposed theoretical framework are constructed in the Institutional Intent and Strategy 2013-2018 document of SU. The findings of the larger 2012 study suggested a missing link between transformation and institutional culture. Although SU is striving towards an inclusive campus or institutional culture, the contention is that transformation extends far deeper. The current analysis reveals that the challenges SU is facing are two-fold. Firstly, the university has to make sure that the proposed ‘core processes’ represent significant actions to address the challenges related to transforming the university’s institutional culture. Secondly, SU should guard against the use of concepts such as ‘redesign’ to imply transformation.</em></p>
topic Constitutive meaning
higher education
institutional culture
theoretical framework
transformation
url https://upjournals.co.za/index.php/EAC/article/view/944
work_keys_str_mv AT antheahydijacobs usingatheoreticalframeworkofinstitutionalculturetoanalyseaninstitutionalstrategydocument
_version_ 1716812856111923200