How does context affect self-governance? Examining Ostrom’s design principles in China
Ostrom’s Design Principles (DPs) are believed to be a set of the best practical guidance for governing natural resources, but applying the DP theory should consider the local context, especially the political context, which has been examined little so far. Using the Institutional Analysis and Develo...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services)
2019-04-01
|
Series: | International Journal of the Commons |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/916 |
id |
doaj-f1ddb214af38439a80d5f5094c4cddcb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f1ddb214af38439a80d5f5094c4cddcb2020-11-25T02:10:00ZengUtrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services)International Journal of the Commons1875-02812019-04-0113166070410.18352/ijc.916411How does context affect self-governance? Examining Ostrom’s design principles in ChinaYahua Wang0Minghui Zhang1Jingning Kang2Tsinghua UniversityTsinghua UniversityTsinghua UniversityOstrom’s Design Principles (DPs) are believed to be a set of the best practical guidance for governing natural resources, but applying the DP theory should consider the local context, especially the political context, which has been examined little so far. Using the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework as a conceptual and analytical lens, this paper examines the impact of authoritarian context on self-governance in China. Based on the results of Barnard’s test and Crisp-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA), our comparative analysis of nine Water Users Association cases provides consistent evidence that supports the DP theory generally on all outcome dimensions. But self-governance under authoritarianism has unique characteristics and its operation depends on proper design of institutional configuration in accordance with context. Our analysis highlights the influence of resource intervention and leadership intervention. It sheds new insights for understanding the significant impacts of the authoritarian context on institutional design of common-pool resources.https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/916design principles, self-governance, authoritarian contexts, water users association (wua), china |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yahua Wang Minghui Zhang Jingning Kang |
spellingShingle |
Yahua Wang Minghui Zhang Jingning Kang How does context affect self-governance? Examining Ostrom’s design principles in China International Journal of the Commons design principles, self-governance, authoritarian contexts, water users association (wua), china |
author_facet |
Yahua Wang Minghui Zhang Jingning Kang |
author_sort |
Yahua Wang |
title |
How does context affect self-governance? Examining Ostrom’s design principles in China |
title_short |
How does context affect self-governance? Examining Ostrom’s design principles in China |
title_full |
How does context affect self-governance? Examining Ostrom’s design principles in China |
title_fullStr |
How does context affect self-governance? Examining Ostrom’s design principles in China |
title_full_unstemmed |
How does context affect self-governance? Examining Ostrom’s design principles in China |
title_sort |
how does context affect self-governance? examining ostrom’s design principles in china |
publisher |
Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services) |
series |
International Journal of the Commons |
issn |
1875-0281 |
publishDate |
2019-04-01 |
description |
Ostrom’s Design Principles (DPs) are believed to be a set of the best practical guidance for governing natural resources, but applying the DP theory should consider the local context, especially the political context, which has been examined little so far. Using the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework as a conceptual and analytical lens, this paper examines the impact of authoritarian context on self-governance in China. Based on the results of Barnard’s test and Crisp-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA), our comparative analysis of nine Water Users Association cases provides consistent evidence that supports the DP theory generally on all outcome dimensions. But self-governance under authoritarianism has unique characteristics and its operation depends on proper design of institutional configuration in accordance with context. Our analysis highlights the influence of resource intervention and leadership intervention. It sheds new insights for understanding the significant impacts of the authoritarian context on institutional design of common-pool resources. |
topic |
design principles, self-governance, authoritarian contexts, water users association (wua), china |
url |
https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/916 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yahuawang howdoescontextaffectselfgovernanceexaminingostromsdesignprinciplesinchina AT minghuizhang howdoescontextaffectselfgovernanceexaminingostromsdesignprinciplesinchina AT jingningkang howdoescontextaffectselfgovernanceexaminingostromsdesignprinciplesinchina |
_version_ |
1724921241452675072 |