Cardiac-Sparing and Breast-Sparing Whole Lung Irradiation Using Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy

• Main Authors: Ru Xin Wong, MBBS, Jacqueline Faught, PhD, Melissa Gargone, MHS, William Myers, PhD, Matthew Krasin, MD, Austin Faught, PhD, Sahaja Acharya, MD
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Particle Therapy Co-operative Group 2021-03-01
• Series: International Journal of Particle Therapy
• Subjects: whole lung irradiation; proton therapy; cardiac-sparing; breast-sparing
• Online Access: https://theijpt.org/doi/pdf/10.14338/IJPT-20-00079.1

Purpose: Whole lung irradiation (WLI) is indicated for certain pediatric patients with lung metastases. This study investigated whether WLI delivered as intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) could significantly spare the heart and breasts when compared with conventional WLI delivered with anteroposterior/posteroanterior photon fields and with intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMRT) WLI. Materials and Methods: Conventional, IMRT, and IMPT plans were generated for 5 patients (aged 5–22 years). The prescription dose was 16.5 GyRBE in 1.5-GyRBE fractions. Conventional plans used 6-MV photons prescribed to the midline and a field-in-field technique to cover the planning target volume (the internal target volume [ITV] + 1 cm). IMRT plans used 6-MV photons with a 7-beam arrangement with dose prescribed to the planning target volume. IMPT plans used scenario-based optimization with 5% range uncertainty and 5-mm positional uncertainty to cover the ITV robustly. Monte Carlo dose calculation was used for all IMPT plans. Doses were compared with paired Student t test. Results: The ITV Dmean was similar for the IMPT, conventional, and IMRT plans, but the IMPT plans had a lower Dmin and a higher Dmax at tissue interfaces than conventional plans (Dmean ratio: 0.96, P > .05; Dmin ratio: 0.9, P < .001; Dmax ratio: 1.1, P = .014). Dmeans for breast and heart substructures were lower with IMPT plans than with conventional/IMRT plans (heart ratios, 0.63:0.73; left ventricle ratios, 0.61:0.72; right ventricle ratios, 0.45:0.57; left atrium ratios, 0.79:0.85; right atrium ratios, 0.81:0.86; left breast ratios, 0.40:0.51; right breast ratio, 0.46:0.52; all P < .05). Conclusions: IMPT resulted in comparable ITV coverage and lower mean doses to the heart and breasts when compared with other techniques. Whole lung irradiation delivered as IMPT warrants prospective evaluation in pediatric patients.