Analysis and simulation on two types of thrust reversers in an aircraft engine

With rapid development of new composite material and manufacturing, innovative engineering solutions are supplied to the advanced nacelle, such as integrated propulsion system(IPS), carbon-fiber composite inner skin by single-piece molding process,which offers a reduction in fuel burn and less noise...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tian Feng, He Jingwu, Xiong Yuexi, Zhao Yanxiong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2017-01-01
Series:MATEC Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201711901012
id doaj-f19b04402ee6454386faebcecdc38c71
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f19b04402ee6454386faebcecdc38c712021-02-02T02:47:32ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2017-01-011190101210.1051/matecconf/201711901012matecconf_imeti2017_01012Analysis and simulation on two types of thrust reversers in an aircraft engineTian FengHe JingwuXiong YuexiZhao YanxiongWith rapid development of new composite material and manufacturing, innovative engineering solutions are supplied to the advanced nacelle, such as integrated propulsion system(IPS), carbon-fiber composite inner skin by single-piece molding process,which offers a reduction in fuel burn and less noise produced by engines. The advanced nacelle has an O-duct thrust reverser demonstrator whose composite structure is in the form of an “O” as opposed to the traditional “D-duct”. A comparative study is to be conducted to investigate the differences between the latest O-duct and conventional D-duct in numerical approaches. To focus on the quantitative analysis of thrust reverser’s operation, this paper mainly uses CATIA/Digital Mock Up(DMU) to simulate under deployment and stowed conditions of two different thrust reverser. After comparing the structural weight, the design models of blocker door are built for kinematic analysis of relevant mechanism and simulation. The results show that simplified design and elimination of multiple interfaces generates weight saving, O-duct improves airflows within the engine, meanwhile D-duct has excellent cost effective and maintainability.https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201711901012
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tian Feng
He Jingwu
Xiong Yuexi
Zhao Yanxiong
spellingShingle Tian Feng
He Jingwu
Xiong Yuexi
Zhao Yanxiong
Analysis and simulation on two types of thrust reversers in an aircraft engine
MATEC Web of Conferences
author_facet Tian Feng
He Jingwu
Xiong Yuexi
Zhao Yanxiong
author_sort Tian Feng
title Analysis and simulation on two types of thrust reversers in an aircraft engine
title_short Analysis and simulation on two types of thrust reversers in an aircraft engine
title_full Analysis and simulation on two types of thrust reversers in an aircraft engine
title_fullStr Analysis and simulation on two types of thrust reversers in an aircraft engine
title_full_unstemmed Analysis and simulation on two types of thrust reversers in an aircraft engine
title_sort analysis and simulation on two types of thrust reversers in an aircraft engine
publisher EDP Sciences
series MATEC Web of Conferences
issn 2261-236X
publishDate 2017-01-01
description With rapid development of new composite material and manufacturing, innovative engineering solutions are supplied to the advanced nacelle, such as integrated propulsion system(IPS), carbon-fiber composite inner skin by single-piece molding process,which offers a reduction in fuel burn and less noise produced by engines. The advanced nacelle has an O-duct thrust reverser demonstrator whose composite structure is in the form of an “O” as opposed to the traditional “D-duct”. A comparative study is to be conducted to investigate the differences between the latest O-duct and conventional D-duct in numerical approaches. To focus on the quantitative analysis of thrust reverser’s operation, this paper mainly uses CATIA/Digital Mock Up(DMU) to simulate under deployment and stowed conditions of two different thrust reverser. After comparing the structural weight, the design models of blocker door are built for kinematic analysis of relevant mechanism and simulation. The results show that simplified design and elimination of multiple interfaces generates weight saving, O-duct improves airflows within the engine, meanwhile D-duct has excellent cost effective and maintainability.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201711901012
work_keys_str_mv AT tianfeng analysisandsimulationontwotypesofthrustreversersinanaircraftengine
AT hejingwu analysisandsimulationontwotypesofthrustreversersinanaircraftengine
AT xiongyuexi analysisandsimulationontwotypesofthrustreversersinanaircraftengine
AT zhaoyanxiong analysisandsimulationontwotypesofthrustreversersinanaircraftengine
_version_ 1724309193405497344