Voxel-based partial volume correction for accurate quantitative voxel values

<div class="WordSection1"><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The accuracy of voxelized information in emission imaging is limited by spatial resolution (FWHM = 2.35σ) producing biases for objects smaller than 3 FWHM. If the signal distribution is non‐uniform within 3σ of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Justin Mikell, S Cheenu Kappadath
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IJCTO 2014-03-01
Series:International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology
Online Access:http://ijcto.org/index.php/IJCTO/article/view/116
id doaj-f18aae20f7f24d89b8efaeb3b44b1843
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f18aae20f7f24d89b8efaeb3b44b18432020-11-24T23:07:04ZengIJCTOInternational Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology 2330-40492014-03-012267Voxel-based partial volume correction for accurate quantitative voxel valuesJustin Mikell0S Cheenu Kappadath1Department of Imaging Physics, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX, USA.Department of Imaging Physics, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX, USA.<div class="WordSection1"><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The accuracy of voxelized information in emission imaging is limited by spatial resolution (FWHM = 2.35σ) producing biases for objects smaller than 3 FWHM. If the signal distribution is non‐uniform within 3σ of the voxel of interest then equilibrium does not exist and partial volume effect (PVE) compromises voxel accuracy. We propose a mathematical model to improve the accuracy of quantitative images of arbitrary distribution by bounding true voxel signal and estimating PVE for each voxel.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong>: A monotonically increasing parametric dataset is created for each voxel of an emission image by radial integration from the voxel center to radius = 6σ. Each cumulative integration plot from r = 3σ to 6σ is fit to a function A*4π /3*r<sup>3</sup> + B*ΔV derived assuming a local uniform signal distribution (A) where ΔV is the voxel volume. The constant BΔV represents the converged within 3σ integral of PVE. B &gt; 0 implies spill‐out, B &lt; 0 spill‐in, and B = 0 no PVE. We tested the proposed model on simulations of 1D&amp;2D datasets containing known signal distributions and 18F‐PET/CT images of a 6cc lung lesion and bladder.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Signal accuracy was &gt; 99% in simulated 1D &amp; 2D datasets. For the tumor, the original maximum value was 10kBq/ml. We obtained A = 3.5kBq/ml and B = 14kBq/ml for a total of 17.7kBq/ml. This yields (A+B)/original = 1.8 indicating substantial spill‐out of ~80% and a large error for the original voxel value. For a voxel in the center of the bladder, the original value was 46kBq/ml with A = 44kBq/ml, B = 7kBq/ml. (A+B)/original = 1.11 indicating near‐equilibrium at center of bladder and low spill-out of ~11% as expected. Local signal images (A) resemble low‐pass filtered original image and (B) shows the magnitude and direction of PVE.</p></div><p><strong><strong> Conclusion</strong>:</strong> A new mathematical model to estimate the accuracy of voxels in quantitative images of arbitrary distribution has been developed. Analysis of additional patients is underway.<strong><br /></strong></p><p><strong>-------------------------------------</strong></p><p><strong>Cite this article as:</strong> Mikell J, Kappadath SC. Voxel-based partial volume correction for accurate quantitative voxel values. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol 2014; 2(2):020229. <strong>DOI: 10.14319/ijcto.0202.29</strong><br /><br /><br /></p>http://ijcto.org/index.php/IJCTO/article/view/116
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Justin Mikell
S Cheenu Kappadath
spellingShingle Justin Mikell
S Cheenu Kappadath
Voxel-based partial volume correction for accurate quantitative voxel values
International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology
author_facet Justin Mikell
S Cheenu Kappadath
author_sort Justin Mikell
title Voxel-based partial volume correction for accurate quantitative voxel values
title_short Voxel-based partial volume correction for accurate quantitative voxel values
title_full Voxel-based partial volume correction for accurate quantitative voxel values
title_fullStr Voxel-based partial volume correction for accurate quantitative voxel values
title_full_unstemmed Voxel-based partial volume correction for accurate quantitative voxel values
title_sort voxel-based partial volume correction for accurate quantitative voxel values
publisher IJCTO
series International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology
issn 2330-4049
publishDate 2014-03-01
description <div class="WordSection1"><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The accuracy of voxelized information in emission imaging is limited by spatial resolution (FWHM = 2.35σ) producing biases for objects smaller than 3 FWHM. If the signal distribution is non‐uniform within 3σ of the voxel of interest then equilibrium does not exist and partial volume effect (PVE) compromises voxel accuracy. We propose a mathematical model to improve the accuracy of quantitative images of arbitrary distribution by bounding true voxel signal and estimating PVE for each voxel.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong>: A monotonically increasing parametric dataset is created for each voxel of an emission image by radial integration from the voxel center to radius = 6σ. Each cumulative integration plot from r = 3σ to 6σ is fit to a function A*4π /3*r<sup>3</sup> + B*ΔV derived assuming a local uniform signal distribution (A) where ΔV is the voxel volume. The constant BΔV represents the converged within 3σ integral of PVE. B &gt; 0 implies spill‐out, B &lt; 0 spill‐in, and B = 0 no PVE. We tested the proposed model on simulations of 1D&amp;2D datasets containing known signal distributions and 18F‐PET/CT images of a 6cc lung lesion and bladder.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Signal accuracy was &gt; 99% in simulated 1D &amp; 2D datasets. For the tumor, the original maximum value was 10kBq/ml. We obtained A = 3.5kBq/ml and B = 14kBq/ml for a total of 17.7kBq/ml. This yields (A+B)/original = 1.8 indicating substantial spill‐out of ~80% and a large error for the original voxel value. For a voxel in the center of the bladder, the original value was 46kBq/ml with A = 44kBq/ml, B = 7kBq/ml. (A+B)/original = 1.11 indicating near‐equilibrium at center of bladder and low spill-out of ~11% as expected. Local signal images (A) resemble low‐pass filtered original image and (B) shows the magnitude and direction of PVE.</p></div><p><strong><strong> Conclusion</strong>:</strong> A new mathematical model to estimate the accuracy of voxels in quantitative images of arbitrary distribution has been developed. Analysis of additional patients is underway.<strong><br /></strong></p><p><strong>-------------------------------------</strong></p><p><strong>Cite this article as:</strong> Mikell J, Kappadath SC. Voxel-based partial volume correction for accurate quantitative voxel values. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol 2014; 2(2):020229. <strong>DOI: 10.14319/ijcto.0202.29</strong><br /><br /><br /></p>
url http://ijcto.org/index.php/IJCTO/article/view/116
work_keys_str_mv AT justinmikell voxelbasedpartialvolumecorrectionforaccuratequantitativevoxelvalues
AT scheenukappadath voxelbasedpartialvolumecorrectionforaccuratequantitativevoxelvalues
_version_ 1725620326569607168