A structured registration program can be validly used for quality assessment in general practice

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Patient information, medical history, clinical outcomes and demographic information, can be registered in different ways in registration programs. For evaluation of diabetes care, data can easily be extracted from a structured regist...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reijneveld Sijmen A, Wiegersma P Auke, Fokkens Andrea S
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-12-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/241
id doaj-f187ccbf19b54fca8fd81a710f555c86
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f187ccbf19b54fca8fd81a710f555c862020-11-24T23:58:12ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632009-12-019124110.1186/1472-6963-9-241A structured registration program can be validly used for quality assessment in general practiceReijneveld Sijmen AWiegersma P AukeFokkens Andrea S<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Patient information, medical history, clinical outcomes and demographic information, can be registered in different ways in registration programs. For evaluation of diabetes care, data can easily be extracted from a structured registration program (SRP). The usability of data from this source depends on the agreement of this data with that of the usual data registration in the electronic medical record (EMR).</p> <p>Aim of the study was to determine the comparability of data from an EMR and from an SRP, to determine whether the use of SRP data for quality assessment is justified in general practice.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We obtained 196 records of diabetes mellitus patients in a sample of general practices in the Netherlands. We compared the agreement between the two programs in terms of laboratory and non-laboratory parameters. Agreement was determined by defining accordance between the programs in absent and present registrations, accordance between values of registrations, and whether the differences found in values were also a clinically relevant difference.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>No differences were found in the occurrence of registration (absent/present) in the SRP and EMR for all the laboratory parameters. Smoking behaviour, weight and eye examination were registered significantly more often in the SRP than in the EMR. In the EMR, blood pressure was registered significantly more often than in the SRP. Data registered in the EMR and in the SRP had a similar clinical meaning for all parameters (laboratory and non-laboratory).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Laboratory parameters showed good agreement and non-laboratory acceptable agreement of the SRP with the EMR. Data from a structured registration program can be used validly for research purposes and quality assessment in general practice.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/241
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Reijneveld Sijmen A
Wiegersma P Auke
Fokkens Andrea S
spellingShingle Reijneveld Sijmen A
Wiegersma P Auke
Fokkens Andrea S
A structured registration program can be validly used for quality assessment in general practice
BMC Health Services Research
author_facet Reijneveld Sijmen A
Wiegersma P Auke
Fokkens Andrea S
author_sort Reijneveld Sijmen A
title A structured registration program can be validly used for quality assessment in general practice
title_short A structured registration program can be validly used for quality assessment in general practice
title_full A structured registration program can be validly used for quality assessment in general practice
title_fullStr A structured registration program can be validly used for quality assessment in general practice
title_full_unstemmed A structured registration program can be validly used for quality assessment in general practice
title_sort structured registration program can be validly used for quality assessment in general practice
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2009-12-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Patient information, medical history, clinical outcomes and demographic information, can be registered in different ways in registration programs. For evaluation of diabetes care, data can easily be extracted from a structured registration program (SRP). The usability of data from this source depends on the agreement of this data with that of the usual data registration in the electronic medical record (EMR).</p> <p>Aim of the study was to determine the comparability of data from an EMR and from an SRP, to determine whether the use of SRP data for quality assessment is justified in general practice.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We obtained 196 records of diabetes mellitus patients in a sample of general practices in the Netherlands. We compared the agreement between the two programs in terms of laboratory and non-laboratory parameters. Agreement was determined by defining accordance between the programs in absent and present registrations, accordance between values of registrations, and whether the differences found in values were also a clinically relevant difference.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>No differences were found in the occurrence of registration (absent/present) in the SRP and EMR for all the laboratory parameters. Smoking behaviour, weight and eye examination were registered significantly more often in the SRP than in the EMR. In the EMR, blood pressure was registered significantly more often than in the SRP. Data registered in the EMR and in the SRP had a similar clinical meaning for all parameters (laboratory and non-laboratory).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Laboratory parameters showed good agreement and non-laboratory acceptable agreement of the SRP with the EMR. Data from a structured registration program can be used validly for research purposes and quality assessment in general practice.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/241
work_keys_str_mv AT reijneveldsijmena astructuredregistrationprogramcanbevalidlyusedforqualityassessmentingeneralpractice
AT wiegersmapauke astructuredregistrationprogramcanbevalidlyusedforqualityassessmentingeneralpractice
AT fokkensandreas astructuredregistrationprogramcanbevalidlyusedforqualityassessmentingeneralpractice
AT reijneveldsijmena structuredregistrationprogramcanbevalidlyusedforqualityassessmentingeneralpractice
AT wiegersmapauke structuredregistrationprogramcanbevalidlyusedforqualityassessmentingeneralpractice
AT fokkensandreas structuredregistrationprogramcanbevalidlyusedforqualityassessmentingeneralpractice
_version_ 1725451211527684096