A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Joint Inversion
Different geophysical data sets such as receiver functions, surface wave dispersion measurements, and first arrival travel times, provide complementary information about the Earth structure. To utilize all this information, it is desirable to perform a joint inversion, i.e., to use all these dataset...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
AIMS Press
2016-03-01
|
Series: | AIMS Geosciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.aimspress.com/geosciences/article/716/fulltext.html |
id |
doaj-f1598dd0b1f641208913cfd0257ece70 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f1598dd0b1f641208913cfd0257ece702020-11-24T21:59:50ZengAIMS PressAIMS Geosciences2471-21322016-03-0121638710.3934/geosci.2016.1.63geosci-01-00063A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Joint InversionAaron A. Velasco0Vladik Kreinovich1Lennox Thompson2Department of Computer Science, University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP), 500 W. University Avenue, El Paso, TX 79968, USADepartment of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP), 500 W. University Avenue, El Paso, TX 79968, USADepartment of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP), 500 W. University Avenue, El Paso, TX 79968, USADifferent geophysical data sets such as receiver functions, surface wave dispersion measurements, and first arrival travel times, provide complementary information about the Earth structure. To utilize all this information, it is desirable to perform a joint inversion, i.e., to use all these datasets when determining the Earth structure. In the ideal case, when we know the variance of each measurement, we can use the usual Least Squares approach to solve the joint inversion problem. In practice, we only have an approximate knowledge of these variances. As a result, if a geophysical feature appears in a solution corresponding to these approximate values of variances, there is no guarantee that this feature will still be visible if we use the actual (somewhat different) variances. <br />To make the joint inversion process more robust, it is therefore desirable to repeatedly solve the joint inversion problem with different possible combinations of variances. From the mathematical viewpoint, such solutions form a Pareto front of the corresponding multi-objective optimization problem.http://www.aimspress.com/geosciences/article/716/fulltext.htmlTeleseismicReceiver FunctionsPrimal-Dual Interior Point Method |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Aaron A. Velasco Vladik Kreinovich Lennox Thompson |
spellingShingle |
Aaron A. Velasco Vladik Kreinovich Lennox Thompson A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Joint Inversion AIMS Geosciences Teleseismic Receiver Functions Primal-Dual Interior Point Method |
author_facet |
Aaron A. Velasco Vladik Kreinovich Lennox Thompson |
author_sort |
Aaron A. Velasco |
title |
A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Joint Inversion |
title_short |
A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Joint Inversion |
title_full |
A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Joint Inversion |
title_fullStr |
A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Joint Inversion |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Joint Inversion |
title_sort |
multi-objective optimization framework for joint inversion |
publisher |
AIMS Press |
series |
AIMS Geosciences |
issn |
2471-2132 |
publishDate |
2016-03-01 |
description |
Different geophysical data sets such as receiver functions, surface wave dispersion measurements, and first arrival travel times, provide complementary information about the Earth structure. To utilize all this information, it is desirable to perform a joint inversion, i.e., to use all these datasets when determining the Earth structure. In the ideal case, when we know the variance of each measurement, we can use the usual Least Squares approach to solve the joint inversion problem. In practice, we only have an approximate knowledge of these variances. As a result, if a geophysical feature appears in a solution corresponding to these approximate values of variances, there is no guarantee that this feature will still be visible if we use the actual (somewhat different) variances. <br />To make the joint inversion process more robust, it is therefore desirable to repeatedly solve the joint inversion problem with different possible combinations of variances. From the mathematical viewpoint, such solutions form a Pareto front of the corresponding multi-objective optimization problem. |
topic |
Teleseismic Receiver Functions Primal-Dual Interior Point Method |
url |
http://www.aimspress.com/geosciences/article/716/fulltext.html |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT aaronavelasco amultiobjectiveoptimizationframeworkforjointinversion AT vladikkreinovich amultiobjectiveoptimizationframeworkforjointinversion AT lennoxthompson amultiobjectiveoptimizationframeworkforjointinversion AT aaronavelasco multiobjectiveoptimizationframeworkforjointinversion AT vladikkreinovich multiobjectiveoptimizationframeworkforjointinversion AT lennoxthompson multiobjectiveoptimizationframeworkforjointinversion |
_version_ |
1725846996721336320 |