A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Joint Inversion

Different geophysical data sets such as receiver functions, surface wave dispersion measurements, and first arrival travel times, provide complementary information about the Earth structure. To utilize all this information, it is desirable to perform a joint inversion, i.e., to use all these dataset...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aaron A. Velasco, Vladik Kreinovich, Lennox Thompson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIMS Press 2016-03-01
Series:AIMS Geosciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.aimspress.com/geosciences/article/716/fulltext.html
id doaj-f1598dd0b1f641208913cfd0257ece70
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f1598dd0b1f641208913cfd0257ece702020-11-24T21:59:50ZengAIMS PressAIMS Geosciences2471-21322016-03-0121638710.3934/geosci.2016.1.63geosci-01-00063A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Joint InversionAaron A. Velasco0Vladik Kreinovich1Lennox Thompson2Department of Computer Science, University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP), 500 W. University Avenue, El Paso, TX 79968, USADepartment of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP), 500 W. University Avenue, El Paso, TX 79968, USADepartment of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP), 500 W. University Avenue, El Paso, TX 79968, USADifferent geophysical data sets such as receiver functions, surface wave dispersion measurements, and first arrival travel times, provide complementary information about the Earth structure. To utilize all this information, it is desirable to perform a joint inversion, i.e., to use all these datasets when determining the Earth structure. In the ideal case, when we know the variance of each measurement, we can use the usual Least Squares approach to solve the joint inversion problem. In practice, we only have an approximate knowledge of these variances. As a result, if a geophysical feature appears in a solution corresponding to these approximate values of variances, there is no guarantee that this feature will still be visible if we use the actual (somewhat different) variances. <br />To make the joint inversion process more robust, it is therefore desirable to repeatedly solve the joint inversion problem with different possible combinations of variances. From the mathematical viewpoint, such solutions form a Pareto front of the corresponding multi-objective optimization problem.http://www.aimspress.com/geosciences/article/716/fulltext.htmlTeleseismicReceiver FunctionsPrimal-Dual Interior Point Method
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aaron A. Velasco
Vladik Kreinovich
Lennox Thompson
spellingShingle Aaron A. Velasco
Vladik Kreinovich
Lennox Thompson
A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Joint Inversion
AIMS Geosciences
Teleseismic
Receiver Functions
Primal-Dual Interior Point Method
author_facet Aaron A. Velasco
Vladik Kreinovich
Lennox Thompson
author_sort Aaron A. Velasco
title A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Joint Inversion
title_short A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Joint Inversion
title_full A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Joint Inversion
title_fullStr A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Joint Inversion
title_full_unstemmed A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Joint Inversion
title_sort multi-objective optimization framework for joint inversion
publisher AIMS Press
series AIMS Geosciences
issn 2471-2132
publishDate 2016-03-01
description Different geophysical data sets such as receiver functions, surface wave dispersion measurements, and first arrival travel times, provide complementary information about the Earth structure. To utilize all this information, it is desirable to perform a joint inversion, i.e., to use all these datasets when determining the Earth structure. In the ideal case, when we know the variance of each measurement, we can use the usual Least Squares approach to solve the joint inversion problem. In practice, we only have an approximate knowledge of these variances. As a result, if a geophysical feature appears in a solution corresponding to these approximate values of variances, there is no guarantee that this feature will still be visible if we use the actual (somewhat different) variances. <br />To make the joint inversion process more robust, it is therefore desirable to repeatedly solve the joint inversion problem with different possible combinations of variances. From the mathematical viewpoint, such solutions form a Pareto front of the corresponding multi-objective optimization problem.
topic Teleseismic
Receiver Functions
Primal-Dual Interior Point Method
url http://www.aimspress.com/geosciences/article/716/fulltext.html
work_keys_str_mv AT aaronavelasco amultiobjectiveoptimizationframeworkforjointinversion
AT vladikkreinovich amultiobjectiveoptimizationframeworkforjointinversion
AT lennoxthompson amultiobjectiveoptimizationframeworkforjointinversion
AT aaronavelasco multiobjectiveoptimizationframeworkforjointinversion
AT vladikkreinovich multiobjectiveoptimizationframeworkforjointinversion
AT lennoxthompson multiobjectiveoptimizationframeworkforjointinversion
_version_ 1725846996721336320