Impact of a Modified Version of Baby-Led Weaning on Infant Food and Nutrient Intakes: The BLISS Randomized Controlled Trial

Despite growing international interest in Baby-Led Weaning (BLW), we know almost nothing about food and nutrient intake in infants following baby-led approaches to infant feeding. The aim of this paper was to determine the impact of modified BLW (i.e., Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS; BLISS) on food...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liz Williams Erickson, Rachael W. Taylor, Jillian J. Haszard, Elizabeth A. Fleming, Lisa Daniels, Brittany J. Morison, Claudia Leong, Louise J. Fangupo, Benjamin J. Wheeler, Barry J. Taylor, Lisa Te Morenga, Rachael M. McLean, Anne-Louise M. Heath
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-06-01
Series:Nutrients
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/10/6/740
id doaj-f12354f020604a289649cbddc64ca7b0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f12354f020604a289649cbddc64ca7b02020-11-25T01:05:58ZengMDPI AGNutrients2072-66432018-06-0110674010.3390/nu10060740nu10060740Impact of a Modified Version of Baby-Led Weaning on Infant Food and Nutrient Intakes: The BLISS Randomized Controlled TrialLiz Williams Erickson0Rachael W. Taylor1Jillian J. Haszard2Elizabeth A. Fleming3Lisa Daniels4Brittany J. Morison5Claudia Leong6Louise J. Fangupo7Benjamin J. Wheeler8Barry J. Taylor9Lisa Te Morenga10Rachael M. McLean11Anne-Louise M. Heath12Department of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Women’s and Children’s Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of the Dean, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDespite growing international interest in Baby-Led Weaning (BLW), we know almost nothing about food and nutrient intake in infants following baby-led approaches to infant feeding. The aim of this paper was to determine the impact of modified BLW (i.e., Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS; BLISS) on food and nutrient intake at 7–24 months of age. Two hundred and six women recruited in late pregnancy were randomized to Control (n = 101) or BLISS (n = 105) groups. All participants received standard well-child care. BLISS participants also received lactation consultant support to six months, and educational sessions about BLISS (5.5, 7, and 9 months). Three-day weighed diet records were collected for the infants (7, 12, and 24 months). Compared to the Control group, BLISS infants consumed more sodium (percent difference, 95% CI: 35%, 19% to 54%) and fat (6%, 1% to 11%) at 7 months, and less saturated fat (−7%, −14% to −0.4%) at 12 months. No differences were apparent at 24 months of age but the majority of infants from both groups had excessive intakes of sodium (68% of children) and added sugars (75% of children). Overall, BLISS appears to result in a diet that is as nutritionally adequate as traditional spoon-feeding, and may address some concerns about the nutritional adequacy of unmodified BLW. However, BLISS and Control infants both had high intakes of sodium and added sugars by 24 months that are concerning.http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/10/6/740Baby-Led WeaningBaby-Led Introduction to SolidStraditional spoon-feedingcomplementary feedinginfantsnutrient intakefood intake
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Liz Williams Erickson
Rachael W. Taylor
Jillian J. Haszard
Elizabeth A. Fleming
Lisa Daniels
Brittany J. Morison
Claudia Leong
Louise J. Fangupo
Benjamin J. Wheeler
Barry J. Taylor
Lisa Te Morenga
Rachael M. McLean
Anne-Louise M. Heath
spellingShingle Liz Williams Erickson
Rachael W. Taylor
Jillian J. Haszard
Elizabeth A. Fleming
Lisa Daniels
Brittany J. Morison
Claudia Leong
Louise J. Fangupo
Benjamin J. Wheeler
Barry J. Taylor
Lisa Te Morenga
Rachael M. McLean
Anne-Louise M. Heath
Impact of a Modified Version of Baby-Led Weaning on Infant Food and Nutrient Intakes: The BLISS Randomized Controlled Trial
Nutrients
Baby-Led Weaning
Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS
traditional spoon-feeding
complementary feeding
infants
nutrient intake
food intake
author_facet Liz Williams Erickson
Rachael W. Taylor
Jillian J. Haszard
Elizabeth A. Fleming
Lisa Daniels
Brittany J. Morison
Claudia Leong
Louise J. Fangupo
Benjamin J. Wheeler
Barry J. Taylor
Lisa Te Morenga
Rachael M. McLean
Anne-Louise M. Heath
author_sort Liz Williams Erickson
title Impact of a Modified Version of Baby-Led Weaning on Infant Food and Nutrient Intakes: The BLISS Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Impact of a Modified Version of Baby-Led Weaning on Infant Food and Nutrient Intakes: The BLISS Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Impact of a Modified Version of Baby-Led Weaning on Infant Food and Nutrient Intakes: The BLISS Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Impact of a Modified Version of Baby-Led Weaning on Infant Food and Nutrient Intakes: The BLISS Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Impact of a Modified Version of Baby-Led Weaning on Infant Food and Nutrient Intakes: The BLISS Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort impact of a modified version of baby-led weaning on infant food and nutrient intakes: the bliss randomized controlled trial
publisher MDPI AG
series Nutrients
issn 2072-6643
publishDate 2018-06-01
description Despite growing international interest in Baby-Led Weaning (BLW), we know almost nothing about food and nutrient intake in infants following baby-led approaches to infant feeding. The aim of this paper was to determine the impact of modified BLW (i.e., Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS; BLISS) on food and nutrient intake at 7–24 months of age. Two hundred and six women recruited in late pregnancy were randomized to Control (n = 101) or BLISS (n = 105) groups. All participants received standard well-child care. BLISS participants also received lactation consultant support to six months, and educational sessions about BLISS (5.5, 7, and 9 months). Three-day weighed diet records were collected for the infants (7, 12, and 24 months). Compared to the Control group, BLISS infants consumed more sodium (percent difference, 95% CI: 35%, 19% to 54%) and fat (6%, 1% to 11%) at 7 months, and less saturated fat (−7%, −14% to −0.4%) at 12 months. No differences were apparent at 24 months of age but the majority of infants from both groups had excessive intakes of sodium (68% of children) and added sugars (75% of children). Overall, BLISS appears to result in a diet that is as nutritionally adequate as traditional spoon-feeding, and may address some concerns about the nutritional adequacy of unmodified BLW. However, BLISS and Control infants both had high intakes of sodium and added sugars by 24 months that are concerning.
topic Baby-Led Weaning
Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS
traditional spoon-feeding
complementary feeding
infants
nutrient intake
food intake
url http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/10/6/740
work_keys_str_mv AT lizwilliamserickson impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rachaelwtaylor impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jillianjhaszard impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT elizabethafleming impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lisadaniels impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT brittanyjmorison impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT claudialeong impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT louisejfangupo impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT benjaminjwheeler impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT barryjtaylor impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lisatemorenga impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rachaelmmclean impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT annelouisemheath impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1725192181029797888