Impact of a Modified Version of Baby-Led Weaning on Infant Food and Nutrient Intakes: The BLISS Randomized Controlled Trial
Despite growing international interest in Baby-Led Weaning (BLW), we know almost nothing about food and nutrient intake in infants following baby-led approaches to infant feeding. The aim of this paper was to determine the impact of modified BLW (i.e., Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS; BLISS) on food...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-06-01
|
Series: | Nutrients |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/10/6/740 |
id |
doaj-f12354f020604a289649cbddc64ca7b0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f12354f020604a289649cbddc64ca7b02020-11-25T01:05:58ZengMDPI AGNutrients2072-66432018-06-0110674010.3390/nu10060740nu10060740Impact of a Modified Version of Baby-Led Weaning on Infant Food and Nutrient Intakes: The BLISS Randomized Controlled TrialLiz Williams Erickson0Rachael W. Taylor1Jillian J. Haszard2Elizabeth A. Fleming3Lisa Daniels4Brittany J. Morison5Claudia Leong6Louise J. Fangupo7Benjamin J. Wheeler8Barry J. Taylor9Lisa Te Morenga10Rachael M. McLean11Anne-Louise M. Heath12Department of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Women’s and Children’s Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of the Dean, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDespite growing international interest in Baby-Led Weaning (BLW), we know almost nothing about food and nutrient intake in infants following baby-led approaches to infant feeding. The aim of this paper was to determine the impact of modified BLW (i.e., Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS; BLISS) on food and nutrient intake at 7–24 months of age. Two hundred and six women recruited in late pregnancy were randomized to Control (n = 101) or BLISS (n = 105) groups. All participants received standard well-child care. BLISS participants also received lactation consultant support to six months, and educational sessions about BLISS (5.5, 7, and 9 months). Three-day weighed diet records were collected for the infants (7, 12, and 24 months). Compared to the Control group, BLISS infants consumed more sodium (percent difference, 95% CI: 35%, 19% to 54%) and fat (6%, 1% to 11%) at 7 months, and less saturated fat (−7%, −14% to −0.4%) at 12 months. No differences were apparent at 24 months of age but the majority of infants from both groups had excessive intakes of sodium (68% of children) and added sugars (75% of children). Overall, BLISS appears to result in a diet that is as nutritionally adequate as traditional spoon-feeding, and may address some concerns about the nutritional adequacy of unmodified BLW. However, BLISS and Control infants both had high intakes of sodium and added sugars by 24 months that are concerning.http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/10/6/740Baby-Led WeaningBaby-Led Introduction to SolidStraditional spoon-feedingcomplementary feedinginfantsnutrient intakefood intake |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Liz Williams Erickson Rachael W. Taylor Jillian J. Haszard Elizabeth A. Fleming Lisa Daniels Brittany J. Morison Claudia Leong Louise J. Fangupo Benjamin J. Wheeler Barry J. Taylor Lisa Te Morenga Rachael M. McLean Anne-Louise M. Heath |
spellingShingle |
Liz Williams Erickson Rachael W. Taylor Jillian J. Haszard Elizabeth A. Fleming Lisa Daniels Brittany J. Morison Claudia Leong Louise J. Fangupo Benjamin J. Wheeler Barry J. Taylor Lisa Te Morenga Rachael M. McLean Anne-Louise M. Heath Impact of a Modified Version of Baby-Led Weaning on Infant Food and Nutrient Intakes: The BLISS Randomized Controlled Trial Nutrients Baby-Led Weaning Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS traditional spoon-feeding complementary feeding infants nutrient intake food intake |
author_facet |
Liz Williams Erickson Rachael W. Taylor Jillian J. Haszard Elizabeth A. Fleming Lisa Daniels Brittany J. Morison Claudia Leong Louise J. Fangupo Benjamin J. Wheeler Barry J. Taylor Lisa Te Morenga Rachael M. McLean Anne-Louise M. Heath |
author_sort |
Liz Williams Erickson |
title |
Impact of a Modified Version of Baby-Led Weaning on Infant Food and Nutrient Intakes: The BLISS Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short |
Impact of a Modified Version of Baby-Led Weaning on Infant Food and Nutrient Intakes: The BLISS Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full |
Impact of a Modified Version of Baby-Led Weaning on Infant Food and Nutrient Intakes: The BLISS Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr |
Impact of a Modified Version of Baby-Led Weaning on Infant Food and Nutrient Intakes: The BLISS Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of a Modified Version of Baby-Led Weaning on Infant Food and Nutrient Intakes: The BLISS Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort |
impact of a modified version of baby-led weaning on infant food and nutrient intakes: the bliss randomized controlled trial |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Nutrients |
issn |
2072-6643 |
publishDate |
2018-06-01 |
description |
Despite growing international interest in Baby-Led Weaning (BLW), we know almost nothing about food and nutrient intake in infants following baby-led approaches to infant feeding. The aim of this paper was to determine the impact of modified BLW (i.e., Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS; BLISS) on food and nutrient intake at 7–24 months of age. Two hundred and six women recruited in late pregnancy were randomized to Control (n = 101) or BLISS (n = 105) groups. All participants received standard well-child care. BLISS participants also received lactation consultant support to six months, and educational sessions about BLISS (5.5, 7, and 9 months). Three-day weighed diet records were collected for the infants (7, 12, and 24 months). Compared to the Control group, BLISS infants consumed more sodium (percent difference, 95% CI: 35%, 19% to 54%) and fat (6%, 1% to 11%) at 7 months, and less saturated fat (−7%, −14% to −0.4%) at 12 months. No differences were apparent at 24 months of age but the majority of infants from both groups had excessive intakes of sodium (68% of children) and added sugars (75% of children). Overall, BLISS appears to result in a diet that is as nutritionally adequate as traditional spoon-feeding, and may address some concerns about the nutritional adequacy of unmodified BLW. However, BLISS and Control infants both had high intakes of sodium and added sugars by 24 months that are concerning. |
topic |
Baby-Led Weaning Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS traditional spoon-feeding complementary feeding infants nutrient intake food intake |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/10/6/740 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lizwilliamserickson impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rachaelwtaylor impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jillianjhaszard impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT elizabethafleming impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lisadaniels impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT brittanyjmorison impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT claudialeong impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT louisejfangupo impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT benjaminjwheeler impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT barryjtaylor impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lisatemorenga impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rachaelmmclean impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT annelouisemheath impactofamodifiedversionofbabyledweaningoninfantfoodandnutrientintakestheblissrandomizedcontrolledtrial |
_version_ |
1725192181029797888 |