Beyond Afghanistan NATO's partnership with Central Asia and South Caucasus: A tangled partnership?
This article examines how the Alliance's partnership policy has changed in Central Asia and South Caucasus since the 1990s and aims to clarify to what extent NATO's new partnership policy can affect its relations with these countries. NATO–Russian relations and the Afghanistan operation ar...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2014-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Eurasian Studies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879366513000274 |
id |
doaj-f1177ad69d3443ad89a6f994db7be475 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f1177ad69d3443ad89a6f994db7be4752020-11-25T02:48:07ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Eurasian Studies1879-36652014-01-0151889610.1016/j.euras.2013.10.001Beyond Afghanistan NATO's partnership with Central Asia and South Caucasus: A tangled partnership?Arif BağbaşlıoğluThis article examines how the Alliance's partnership policy has changed in Central Asia and South Caucasus since the 1990s and aims to clarify to what extent NATO's new partnership policy can affect its relations with these countries. NATO–Russian relations and the Afghanistan operation are evaluated as the main drivers of this process. The target date of the withdrawal of the ISAF combat mission in December 2014, set at the Lisbon Summit 2010, as well as the shifting of the focus of long-term US foreign policy to the Asia-Pacific region and the US aim of balancing China's influence in this region increase the necessity for the Alliance to redefine its future policy towards Central Asia and South Caucasus. The article claims these developments have caused the need to treat Russia more as a partner than a potential competitor in constituting the policy towards Central Asia and South Caucasus. Furthermore the article claims there is no possibility for new Alliance expansion in this part of the world in the short to medium term.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879366513000274NATONATO's partnership policyCentral AsiaSouth CaucasusAmerican foreign policyGeorgiaKazakhstan |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Arif Bağbaşlıoğlu |
spellingShingle |
Arif Bağbaşlıoğlu Beyond Afghanistan NATO's partnership with Central Asia and South Caucasus: A tangled partnership? Journal of Eurasian Studies NATO NATO's partnership policy Central Asia South Caucasus American foreign policy Georgia Kazakhstan |
author_facet |
Arif Bağbaşlıoğlu |
author_sort |
Arif Bağbaşlıoğlu |
title |
Beyond Afghanistan NATO's partnership with Central Asia and South Caucasus: A tangled partnership? |
title_short |
Beyond Afghanistan NATO's partnership with Central Asia and South Caucasus: A tangled partnership? |
title_full |
Beyond Afghanistan NATO's partnership with Central Asia and South Caucasus: A tangled partnership? |
title_fullStr |
Beyond Afghanistan NATO's partnership with Central Asia and South Caucasus: A tangled partnership? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Beyond Afghanistan NATO's partnership with Central Asia and South Caucasus: A tangled partnership? |
title_sort |
beyond afghanistan nato's partnership with central asia and south caucasus: a tangled partnership? |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Journal of Eurasian Studies |
issn |
1879-3665 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
This article examines how the Alliance's partnership policy has changed in Central Asia and South Caucasus since the 1990s and aims to clarify to what extent NATO's new partnership policy can affect its relations with these countries. NATO–Russian relations and the Afghanistan operation are evaluated as the main drivers of this process. The target date of the withdrawal of the ISAF combat mission in December 2014, set at the Lisbon Summit 2010, as well as the shifting of the focus of long-term US foreign policy to the Asia-Pacific region and the US aim of balancing China's influence in this region increase the necessity for the Alliance to redefine its future policy towards Central Asia and South Caucasus. The article claims these developments have caused the need to treat Russia more as a partner than a potential competitor in constituting the policy towards Central Asia and South Caucasus. Furthermore the article claims there is no possibility for new Alliance expansion in this part of the world in the short to medium term. |
topic |
NATO NATO's partnership policy Central Asia South Caucasus American foreign policy Georgia Kazakhstan |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879366513000274 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT arifbagbaslıoglu beyondafghanistannatospartnershipwithcentralasiaandsouthcaucasusatangledpartnership |
_version_ |
1724749824955252736 |