Phylogenetic analysis of modularity in protein interaction networks

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In systems biology, comparative analyses of molecular interactions across diverse species indicate that conservation and divergence of networks can be used to understand functional evolution from a systems perspective. A key characte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bebek Gurkan, Li Xin, Erten Sinan, Li Jing, Koyutürk Mehmet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-10-01
Series:BMC Bioinformatics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/10/333
id doaj-f11769d26c8943298af4631e8036a36d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f11769d26c8943298af4631e8036a36d2020-11-25T01:00:11ZengBMCBMC Bioinformatics1471-21052009-10-0110133310.1186/1471-2105-10-333Phylogenetic analysis of modularity in protein interaction networksBebek GurkanLi XinErten SinanLi JingKoyutürk Mehmet<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In systems biology, comparative analyses of molecular interactions across diverse species indicate that conservation and divergence of networks can be used to understand functional evolution from a systems perspective. A key characteristic of these networks is their modularity, which contributes significantly to their robustness, as well as adaptability. Consequently, analysis of modular network structures from a phylogenetic perspective may be useful in understanding the emergence, conservation, and diversification of functional modularity.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In this paper, we propose a phylogenetic framework for analyzing network modules, with applications that extend well beyond network-based phylogeny reconstruction. Our approach is based on identification of modular network components from each network separately, followed by projection of these modules onto the networks of other species to compare different networks. Subsequently, we use the conservation of various modules in each network to assess the similarity between different networks. Compared to traditional methods that rely on topological comparisons, our approach has key advantages in (<it>i</it>) avoiding intractable graph comparison problems in comparative network analysis, (<it>ii</it>) accounting for noise and missing data through flexible treatment of network conservation, and (<it>iii</it>) providing insights on the evolution of biological systems through investigation of the evolutionary trajectories of network modules. We test our method, M<smcaps>OPHY</smcaps>, on synthetic data generated by simulation of network evolution, as well as existing protein-protein interaction data for seven diverse species. Comprehensive experimental results show that M<smcaps>OPHY</smcaps> is promising in reconstructing evolutionary histories of extant networks based on conservation of modularity, it is highly robust to noise, and outperforms existing methods that quantify network similarity in terms of conservation of network topology.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>These results establish modularity and network proximity as useful features in comparative network analysis and motivate detailed studies of the evolutionary histories of network modules.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/10/333
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bebek Gurkan
Li Xin
Erten Sinan
Li Jing
Koyutürk Mehmet
spellingShingle Bebek Gurkan
Li Xin
Erten Sinan
Li Jing
Koyutürk Mehmet
Phylogenetic analysis of modularity in protein interaction networks
BMC Bioinformatics
author_facet Bebek Gurkan
Li Xin
Erten Sinan
Li Jing
Koyutürk Mehmet
author_sort Bebek Gurkan
title Phylogenetic analysis of modularity in protein interaction networks
title_short Phylogenetic analysis of modularity in protein interaction networks
title_full Phylogenetic analysis of modularity in protein interaction networks
title_fullStr Phylogenetic analysis of modularity in protein interaction networks
title_full_unstemmed Phylogenetic analysis of modularity in protein interaction networks
title_sort phylogenetic analysis of modularity in protein interaction networks
publisher BMC
series BMC Bioinformatics
issn 1471-2105
publishDate 2009-10-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In systems biology, comparative analyses of molecular interactions across diverse species indicate that conservation and divergence of networks can be used to understand functional evolution from a systems perspective. A key characteristic of these networks is their modularity, which contributes significantly to their robustness, as well as adaptability. Consequently, analysis of modular network structures from a phylogenetic perspective may be useful in understanding the emergence, conservation, and diversification of functional modularity.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In this paper, we propose a phylogenetic framework for analyzing network modules, with applications that extend well beyond network-based phylogeny reconstruction. Our approach is based on identification of modular network components from each network separately, followed by projection of these modules onto the networks of other species to compare different networks. Subsequently, we use the conservation of various modules in each network to assess the similarity between different networks. Compared to traditional methods that rely on topological comparisons, our approach has key advantages in (<it>i</it>) avoiding intractable graph comparison problems in comparative network analysis, (<it>ii</it>) accounting for noise and missing data through flexible treatment of network conservation, and (<it>iii</it>) providing insights on the evolution of biological systems through investigation of the evolutionary trajectories of network modules. We test our method, M<smcaps>OPHY</smcaps>, on synthetic data generated by simulation of network evolution, as well as existing protein-protein interaction data for seven diverse species. Comprehensive experimental results show that M<smcaps>OPHY</smcaps> is promising in reconstructing evolutionary histories of extant networks based on conservation of modularity, it is highly robust to noise, and outperforms existing methods that quantify network similarity in terms of conservation of network topology.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>These results establish modularity and network proximity as useful features in comparative network analysis and motivate detailed studies of the evolutionary histories of network modules.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/10/333
work_keys_str_mv AT bebekgurkan phylogeneticanalysisofmodularityinproteininteractionnetworks
AT lixin phylogeneticanalysisofmodularityinproteininteractionnetworks
AT ertensinan phylogeneticanalysisofmodularityinproteininteractionnetworks
AT lijing phylogeneticanalysisofmodularityinproteininteractionnetworks
AT koyuturkmehmet phylogeneticanalysisofmodularityinproteininteractionnetworks
_version_ 1725214673077272576