Skinfold thickness versus bioelectrical impedance for the evaluation of body composition in athletes: a critical review

Body composition is a determinant factor for performance in different sports modalities. Safe, practical and validated instruments are necessary for the measurement of body composition and for the identification of alterations that occur during the training period. A critical review was performed co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rafael Deminice, Flavia Troncon Rosa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina 2009-01-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano
Online Access:https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/10846
id doaj-f108b4ebfd2d4c47b077f5a5073bef3b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f108b4ebfd2d4c47b077f5a5073bef3b2020-11-25T02:56:05ZengUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaRevista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano1415-84261980-00372009-01-0111333434010.5007/1980-0037.2009v11n3p3349429Skinfold thickness versus bioelectrical impedance for the evaluation of body composition in athletes: a critical reviewRafael Deminice0Flavia Troncon Rosa1Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP. Brasil.Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP. Brasil.Body composition is a determinant factor for performance in different sports modalities. Safe, practical and validated instruments are necessary for the measurement of body composition and for the identification of alterations that occur during the training period. A critical review was performed comparing studies that apply skinfold thickness (SKF) and bioelectrical impedance (BIA) for the estimation of body composition in athletes. Studies published between 1990 and 2007 available online in the Pubmed, SportDiscus and Scielo databases were reviewed. Seven critical points were evaluated to rate the studies: number of subjects, performance level of the athletes studied, statistical methods applied, number of equations tested, test control, sample control, and gold standard used to compare the data. SKF and BIA present advantages for the assessment of body composition in athletes compared to other methods, such as their easy application, non-invasiveness and relatively low cost. The accuracy and reliability of the results obtained with these methods depend on test conditions, equations selected for data analysis and characteristics of the particular group (sports modality, gender, age and performance level). SKF seems to be a better method to estimate body composition in athletes because of the availability of specific equations for different sports modalities and because of the low sensitivity of BIA in detecting minimal alterations that occur during the training period.https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/10846
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rafael Deminice
Flavia Troncon Rosa
spellingShingle Rafael Deminice
Flavia Troncon Rosa
Skinfold thickness versus bioelectrical impedance for the evaluation of body composition in athletes: a critical review
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano
author_facet Rafael Deminice
Flavia Troncon Rosa
author_sort Rafael Deminice
title Skinfold thickness versus bioelectrical impedance for the evaluation of body composition in athletes: a critical review
title_short Skinfold thickness versus bioelectrical impedance for the evaluation of body composition in athletes: a critical review
title_full Skinfold thickness versus bioelectrical impedance for the evaluation of body composition in athletes: a critical review
title_fullStr Skinfold thickness versus bioelectrical impedance for the evaluation of body composition in athletes: a critical review
title_full_unstemmed Skinfold thickness versus bioelectrical impedance for the evaluation of body composition in athletes: a critical review
title_sort skinfold thickness versus bioelectrical impedance for the evaluation of body composition in athletes: a critical review
publisher Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
series Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano
issn 1415-8426
1980-0037
publishDate 2009-01-01
description Body composition is a determinant factor for performance in different sports modalities. Safe, practical and validated instruments are necessary for the measurement of body composition and for the identification of alterations that occur during the training period. A critical review was performed comparing studies that apply skinfold thickness (SKF) and bioelectrical impedance (BIA) for the estimation of body composition in athletes. Studies published between 1990 and 2007 available online in the Pubmed, SportDiscus and Scielo databases were reviewed. Seven critical points were evaluated to rate the studies: number of subjects, performance level of the athletes studied, statistical methods applied, number of equations tested, test control, sample control, and gold standard used to compare the data. SKF and BIA present advantages for the assessment of body composition in athletes compared to other methods, such as their easy application, non-invasiveness and relatively low cost. The accuracy and reliability of the results obtained with these methods depend on test conditions, equations selected for data analysis and characteristics of the particular group (sports modality, gender, age and performance level). SKF seems to be a better method to estimate body composition in athletes because of the availability of specific equations for different sports modalities and because of the low sensitivity of BIA in detecting minimal alterations that occur during the training period.
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/10846
work_keys_str_mv AT rafaeldeminice skinfoldthicknessversusbioelectricalimpedancefortheevaluationofbodycompositioninathletesacriticalreview
AT flaviatronconrosa skinfoldthicknessversusbioelectricalimpedancefortheevaluationofbodycompositioninathletesacriticalreview
_version_ 1724714280505311232