Final Results of the Prospective FH02 Mammographic Surveillance Study of Women Aged 35–39 at Increased Familial Risk of Breast Cancer
Background: Many women who are at increased risk of breast cancer due to a mother or sister diagnosed with breast cancer aged under 40 do not currently qualify for surveillance before 40 years of age. There are almost no available data to assess whether mammography screening aged 35–39 years would b...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2019-01-01
|
Series: | EClinicalMedicine |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589537019300057 |
id |
doaj-f0faf64e3d3e4e639f470965f4da286a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
D.G. Evans S. Thomas J. Caunt A. Burch A.R. Brentnall L. Roberts A. Howell M. Wilson R. Fox S. Hillier D.M. Sibbering S. Moss M.G. Wallis D.M. Eccles S. Duffy |
spellingShingle |
D.G. Evans S. Thomas J. Caunt A. Burch A.R. Brentnall L. Roberts A. Howell M. Wilson R. Fox S. Hillier D.M. Sibbering S. Moss M.G. Wallis D.M. Eccles S. Duffy Final Results of the Prospective FH02 Mammographic Surveillance Study of Women Aged 35–39 at Increased Familial Risk of Breast Cancer EClinicalMedicine |
author_facet |
D.G. Evans S. Thomas J. Caunt A. Burch A.R. Brentnall L. Roberts A. Howell M. Wilson R. Fox S. Hillier D.M. Sibbering S. Moss M.G. Wallis D.M. Eccles S. Duffy |
author_sort |
D.G. Evans |
title |
Final Results of the Prospective FH02 Mammographic Surveillance Study of Women Aged 35–39 at Increased Familial Risk of Breast Cancer |
title_short |
Final Results of the Prospective FH02 Mammographic Surveillance Study of Women Aged 35–39 at Increased Familial Risk of Breast Cancer |
title_full |
Final Results of the Prospective FH02 Mammographic Surveillance Study of Women Aged 35–39 at Increased Familial Risk of Breast Cancer |
title_fullStr |
Final Results of the Prospective FH02 Mammographic Surveillance Study of Women Aged 35–39 at Increased Familial Risk of Breast Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed |
Final Results of the Prospective FH02 Mammographic Surveillance Study of Women Aged 35–39 at Increased Familial Risk of Breast Cancer |
title_sort |
final results of the prospective fh02 mammographic surveillance study of women aged 35–39 at increased familial risk of breast cancer |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
EClinicalMedicine |
issn |
2589-5370 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Background: Many women who are at increased risk of breast cancer due to a mother or sister diagnosed with breast cancer aged under 40 do not currently qualify for surveillance before 40 years of age. There are almost no available data to assess whether mammography screening aged 35–39 years would be effective in this group, in terms of detection of breast cancer at an early stage or cost effective. Methods: A cohort screening study (FH02) with annual mammography was devised for women aged 35–39 to assess the sensitivity and screening performance and potential survival of women with identified tumours. Findings: 2899 women were recruited from 12/2006–12/2015. These women underwent 12,086 annual screening mammograms and were followed for 13,365.8 years. A total of 55 breast cancers in 54 women occurred during the study period (one bilateral) with 50 cancers (49 women) (15 CIS) adherent to the screening. Eighty percent (28/35) of invasive cancers were ≤2 cm and 80% also lymph node negative. Invasive cancers diagnosed in FH02 were significantly smaller than the comparable (POSH-unscreened prospective) study group (45% (131/293) ≤ 2 cm in POSH vs 80% (28/35) in FH02 p < 0.0001), and were less likely to be lymph-node positive (54% (158/290, 3 unknown) in POSH vs 20% (7/35) in FH02: p = 0.0002. Projected and actual survival were also better than POSH. Overall radiation dose was not higher than in an older screened population at mean dose on study per standard sized breast of 1.5 mGy. Interpretation: Mammography screening aged 35–39 years detects breast cancer at an early stage and is likely to be as effective in reducing mortality as in women at increased breast cancer risk aged 40–49 years. Keywords: Mammography, Breast cancer, Young, BRCA1, BRCA2, Familial |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589537019300057 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dgevans finalresultsoftheprospectivefh02mammographicsurveillancestudyofwomenaged3539atincreasedfamilialriskofbreastcancer AT sthomas finalresultsoftheprospectivefh02mammographicsurveillancestudyofwomenaged3539atincreasedfamilialriskofbreastcancer AT jcaunt finalresultsoftheprospectivefh02mammographicsurveillancestudyofwomenaged3539atincreasedfamilialriskofbreastcancer AT aburch finalresultsoftheprospectivefh02mammographicsurveillancestudyofwomenaged3539atincreasedfamilialriskofbreastcancer AT arbrentnall finalresultsoftheprospectivefh02mammographicsurveillancestudyofwomenaged3539atincreasedfamilialriskofbreastcancer AT lroberts finalresultsoftheprospectivefh02mammographicsurveillancestudyofwomenaged3539atincreasedfamilialriskofbreastcancer AT ahowell finalresultsoftheprospectivefh02mammographicsurveillancestudyofwomenaged3539atincreasedfamilialriskofbreastcancer AT mwilson finalresultsoftheprospectivefh02mammographicsurveillancestudyofwomenaged3539atincreasedfamilialriskofbreastcancer AT rfox finalresultsoftheprospectivefh02mammographicsurveillancestudyofwomenaged3539atincreasedfamilialriskofbreastcancer AT shillier finalresultsoftheprospectivefh02mammographicsurveillancestudyofwomenaged3539atincreasedfamilialriskofbreastcancer AT dmsibbering finalresultsoftheprospectivefh02mammographicsurveillancestudyofwomenaged3539atincreasedfamilialriskofbreastcancer AT smoss finalresultsoftheprospectivefh02mammographicsurveillancestudyofwomenaged3539atincreasedfamilialriskofbreastcancer AT mgwallis finalresultsoftheprospectivefh02mammographicsurveillancestudyofwomenaged3539atincreasedfamilialriskofbreastcancer AT dmeccles finalresultsoftheprospectivefh02mammographicsurveillancestudyofwomenaged3539atincreasedfamilialriskofbreastcancer AT sduffy finalresultsoftheprospectivefh02mammographicsurveillancestudyofwomenaged3539atincreasedfamilialriskofbreastcancer |
_version_ |
1724911741101408256 |
spelling |
doaj-f0faf64e3d3e4e639f470965f4da286a2020-11-25T02:11:56ZengElsevierEClinicalMedicine2589-53702019-01-0173946Final Results of the Prospective FH02 Mammographic Surveillance Study of Women Aged 35–39 at Increased Familial Risk of Breast CancerD.G. Evans0S. Thomas1J. Caunt2A. Burch3A.R. Brentnall4L. Roberts5A. Howell6M. Wilson7R. Fox8S. Hillier9D.M. Sibbering10S. Moss11M.G. Wallis12D.M. Eccles13S. Duffy14Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester M23 9LT, UK; Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, St. Mary's Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK; Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Christie Hospital, Withington, Manchester M20 4BX, UK; Corresponding author at: Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University Foundation Trust, St. Mary's Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.Breast Test Wales, 18 Cathedral Road, Cardiff CF11 9LJ, UKBreast Test Wales, 18 Cathedral Road, Cardiff CF11 9LJ, UKBreast Test Wales, 18 Cathedral Road, Cardiff CF11 9LJ, UKCancer Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Mathematics and Statistics, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine' Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UKPrevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester M23 9LT, UKPrevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester M23 9LT, UK; Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Christie Hospital, Withington, Manchester M20 4BX, UKBreast Screening Unit, Nightingale Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester M23 9LT, UKBreast Test Wales, 18 Cathedral Road, Cardiff CF11 9LJ, UKBreast Test Wales, 18 Cathedral Road, Cardiff CF11 9LJ, UKBreast Unit, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby DE22 3NE, UKCancer Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Mathematics and Statistics, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine' Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UKCambridge Breast Unit, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Unit, Box 97, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UKFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UKCancer Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Mathematics and Statistics, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine' Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UKBackground: Many women who are at increased risk of breast cancer due to a mother or sister diagnosed with breast cancer aged under 40 do not currently qualify for surveillance before 40 years of age. There are almost no available data to assess whether mammography screening aged 35–39 years would be effective in this group, in terms of detection of breast cancer at an early stage or cost effective. Methods: A cohort screening study (FH02) with annual mammography was devised for women aged 35–39 to assess the sensitivity and screening performance and potential survival of women with identified tumours. Findings: 2899 women were recruited from 12/2006–12/2015. These women underwent 12,086 annual screening mammograms and were followed for 13,365.8 years. A total of 55 breast cancers in 54 women occurred during the study period (one bilateral) with 50 cancers (49 women) (15 CIS) adherent to the screening. Eighty percent (28/35) of invasive cancers were ≤2 cm and 80% also lymph node negative. Invasive cancers diagnosed in FH02 were significantly smaller than the comparable (POSH-unscreened prospective) study group (45% (131/293) ≤ 2 cm in POSH vs 80% (28/35) in FH02 p < 0.0001), and were less likely to be lymph-node positive (54% (158/290, 3 unknown) in POSH vs 20% (7/35) in FH02: p = 0.0002. Projected and actual survival were also better than POSH. Overall radiation dose was not higher than in an older screened population at mean dose on study per standard sized breast of 1.5 mGy. Interpretation: Mammography screening aged 35–39 years detects breast cancer at an early stage and is likely to be as effective in reducing mortality as in women at increased breast cancer risk aged 40–49 years. Keywords: Mammography, Breast cancer, Young, BRCA1, BRCA2, Familialhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589537019300057 |