Parametric soil water retention models: a critical evaluation of expressions for the full moisture range
Few parametric expressions for the soil water retention curve are suitable for dry conditions. Furthermore, expressions for the soil hydraulic conductivity curves associated with parametric retention functions can behave unrealistically near saturation. We developed a general criterion for water...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2018-02-01
|
Series: | Hydrology and Earth System Sciences |
Online Access: | https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/22/1193/2018/hess-22-1193-2018.pdf |
Summary: | Few parametric expressions for the soil water retention curve are suitable for dry
conditions. Furthermore, expressions for the soil hydraulic conductivity
curves associated with parametric retention functions can behave
unrealistically near saturation. We developed a general criterion for water
retention parameterizations that ensures physically plausible conductivity
curves. Only 3 of the 18 tested parameterizations met this criterion without
restrictions on the parameters of a popular conductivity curve
parameterization. A fourth required one parameter to be fixed.
<br><br>
We estimated parameters by shuffled complex evolution (SCE) with the objective
function tailored to various observation methods used to obtain retention
curve data. We fitted the four parameterizations with physically plausible
conductivities as well as the most widely used parameterization. The
performance of the resulting 12 combinations of retention and conductivity
curves was assessed in a numerical study with 751 days of semiarid
atmospheric forcing applied to unvegetated, uniform, 1 m freely draining
columns for four textures.
<br><br>
Choosing different parameterizations had a minor effect on evaporation, but
cumulative bottom fluxes varied by up to an order of magnitude between them.
This highlights the need for a careful selection of the soil hydraulic
parameterization that ideally does not only rely on goodness of fit to
static soil water retention data but also on hydraulic conductivity
measurements.
<br><br>
Parameter fits for 21 soils showed that extrapolations into the dry range of
the retention curve often became physically more realistic when the
parameterization had a logarithmic dry branch, particularly in fine-textured
soils where high residual water contents would otherwise be fitted. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1027-5606 1607-7938 |