Critical assessment of the evidence for striped nanoparticles.

There is now a significant body of literature which reports that stripes form in the ligand shell of suitably functionalised Au nanoparticles. This stripe morphology has been proposed to strongly affect the physicochemical and biochemical properties of the particles. We critique the published eviden...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julian Stirling, Ioannis Lekkas, Adam Sweetman, Predrag Djuranovic, Quanmin Guo, Brian Pauw, Josef Granwehr, Raphaël Lévy, Philip Moriarty
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4234314?pdf=render
id doaj-f0ed5df7efb4410aaf9ac74f95ae20ab
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f0ed5df7efb4410aaf9ac74f95ae20ab2020-11-25T01:24:03ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-01911e10848210.1371/journal.pone.0108482Critical assessment of the evidence for striped nanoparticles.Julian StirlingIoannis LekkasAdam SweetmanPredrag DjuranovicQuanmin GuoBrian PauwJosef GranwehrRaphaël LévyPhilip MoriartyThere is now a significant body of literature which reports that stripes form in the ligand shell of suitably functionalised Au nanoparticles. This stripe morphology has been proposed to strongly affect the physicochemical and biochemical properties of the particles. We critique the published evidence for striped nanoparticles in detail, with a particular focus on the interpretation of scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM) data (as this is the only technique which ostensibly provides direct evidence for the presence of stripes). Through a combination of an exhaustive re-analysis of the original data, in addition to new experimental measurements of a simple control sample comprising entirely unfunctionalised particles, we show that all of the STM evidence for striped nanoparticles published to date can instead be explained by a combination of well-known instrumental artefacts, or by issues with data acquisition/analysis protocols. We also critically re-examine the evidence for the presence of ligand stripes which has been claimed to have been found from transmission electron microscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, small angle neutron scattering experiments, and computer simulations. Although these data can indeed be interpreted in terms of stripe formation, we show that the reported results can alternatively be explained as arising from a combination of instrumental artefacts and inadequate data analysis techniques.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4234314?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Julian Stirling
Ioannis Lekkas
Adam Sweetman
Predrag Djuranovic
Quanmin Guo
Brian Pauw
Josef Granwehr
Raphaël Lévy
Philip Moriarty
spellingShingle Julian Stirling
Ioannis Lekkas
Adam Sweetman
Predrag Djuranovic
Quanmin Guo
Brian Pauw
Josef Granwehr
Raphaël Lévy
Philip Moriarty
Critical assessment of the evidence for striped nanoparticles.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Julian Stirling
Ioannis Lekkas
Adam Sweetman
Predrag Djuranovic
Quanmin Guo
Brian Pauw
Josef Granwehr
Raphaël Lévy
Philip Moriarty
author_sort Julian Stirling
title Critical assessment of the evidence for striped nanoparticles.
title_short Critical assessment of the evidence for striped nanoparticles.
title_full Critical assessment of the evidence for striped nanoparticles.
title_fullStr Critical assessment of the evidence for striped nanoparticles.
title_full_unstemmed Critical assessment of the evidence for striped nanoparticles.
title_sort critical assessment of the evidence for striped nanoparticles.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description There is now a significant body of literature which reports that stripes form in the ligand shell of suitably functionalised Au nanoparticles. This stripe morphology has been proposed to strongly affect the physicochemical and biochemical properties of the particles. We critique the published evidence for striped nanoparticles in detail, with a particular focus on the interpretation of scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM) data (as this is the only technique which ostensibly provides direct evidence for the presence of stripes). Through a combination of an exhaustive re-analysis of the original data, in addition to new experimental measurements of a simple control sample comprising entirely unfunctionalised particles, we show that all of the STM evidence for striped nanoparticles published to date can instead be explained by a combination of well-known instrumental artefacts, or by issues with data acquisition/analysis protocols. We also critically re-examine the evidence for the presence of ligand stripes which has been claimed to have been found from transmission electron microscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, small angle neutron scattering experiments, and computer simulations. Although these data can indeed be interpreted in terms of stripe formation, we show that the reported results can alternatively be explained as arising from a combination of instrumental artefacts and inadequate data analysis techniques.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4234314?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT julianstirling criticalassessmentoftheevidenceforstripednanoparticles
AT ioannislekkas criticalassessmentoftheevidenceforstripednanoparticles
AT adamsweetman criticalassessmentoftheevidenceforstripednanoparticles
AT predragdjuranovic criticalassessmentoftheevidenceforstripednanoparticles
AT quanminguo criticalassessmentoftheevidenceforstripednanoparticles
AT brianpauw criticalassessmentoftheevidenceforstripednanoparticles
AT josefgranwehr criticalassessmentoftheevidenceforstripednanoparticles
AT raphaellevy criticalassessmentoftheevidenceforstripednanoparticles
AT philipmoriarty criticalassessmentoftheevidenceforstripednanoparticles
_version_ 1725119205836062720