Methodology for Calculating the European Innovation Scoreboard—Proposition for Modification

The primary purpose of this article is to identify determinants affecting the Summary Innovation Index and, consequently, the positions of countries on the European Innovation Scoreboard (EIS). Then, based on the identified determinants, these countries are ranked using the linear ordering method. T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edyta Bielińska-Dusza, Monika Hamerska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-02-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
EIS
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2199
id doaj-f0e6f2764bfb45f1a29758daf185e0cc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f0e6f2764bfb45f1a29758daf185e0cc2021-02-19T00:04:17ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-02-01132199219910.3390/su13042199Methodology for Calculating the European Innovation Scoreboard—Proposition for ModificationEdyta Bielińska-Dusza0Monika Hamerska1Department of Strategic Analysis, Cracow University of Economics, 31-510 Kraków, PolandDepartment of International Management, Cracow University of Economics, 31-510 Kraków, PolandThe primary purpose of this article is to identify determinants affecting the Summary Innovation Index and, consequently, the positions of countries on the European Innovation Scoreboard (EIS). Then, based on the identified determinants, these countries are ranked using the linear ordering method. This article presents the concept of innovation as an unwavering subject of interest for researchers from around the world. Issues relating to measuring innovation, which is necessary for the efficient management of an organization, as well as to the study of innovation in individual countries, are discussed. Special attention is drawn to the methodological aspects of constructing the European Innovation Scoreboard (EIS). The identification of determinants affecting the level of the Summary Innovation Index is performed through stepwise regression. This makes it possible to reduce the number of factors utilized in the EIS ranking procedure from 27 to 22. This was the inspiration to apply an innovative approach and use the linear ordering method, in order to show that it is possible to obtain a ranking that is very similar to the EIS ranking with a reduced number of indicators. These results may be significant, both for units developing this type of ranking and for users, such as decision-makers, using the results to make strategic decisions. In our opinion, this innovative approach—that is, using the linear ordering method and a reduced number of indicators—makes it possible to create a more transparent EIS ranking. This article is of theoretical, methodological, and empirical interest.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2199innovationEuropean Innovation ScoreboardEISInnovation Union Scoreboardranking of innovationCommunity Innovation Survey
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Edyta Bielińska-Dusza
Monika Hamerska
spellingShingle Edyta Bielińska-Dusza
Monika Hamerska
Methodology for Calculating the European Innovation Scoreboard—Proposition for Modification
Sustainability
innovation
European Innovation Scoreboard
EIS
Innovation Union Scoreboard
ranking of innovation
Community Innovation Survey
author_facet Edyta Bielińska-Dusza
Monika Hamerska
author_sort Edyta Bielińska-Dusza
title Methodology for Calculating the European Innovation Scoreboard—Proposition for Modification
title_short Methodology for Calculating the European Innovation Scoreboard—Proposition for Modification
title_full Methodology for Calculating the European Innovation Scoreboard—Proposition for Modification
title_fullStr Methodology for Calculating the European Innovation Scoreboard—Proposition for Modification
title_full_unstemmed Methodology for Calculating the European Innovation Scoreboard—Proposition for Modification
title_sort methodology for calculating the european innovation scoreboard—proposition for modification
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2021-02-01
description The primary purpose of this article is to identify determinants affecting the Summary Innovation Index and, consequently, the positions of countries on the European Innovation Scoreboard (EIS). Then, based on the identified determinants, these countries are ranked using the linear ordering method. This article presents the concept of innovation as an unwavering subject of interest for researchers from around the world. Issues relating to measuring innovation, which is necessary for the efficient management of an organization, as well as to the study of innovation in individual countries, are discussed. Special attention is drawn to the methodological aspects of constructing the European Innovation Scoreboard (EIS). The identification of determinants affecting the level of the Summary Innovation Index is performed through stepwise regression. This makes it possible to reduce the number of factors utilized in the EIS ranking procedure from 27 to 22. This was the inspiration to apply an innovative approach and use the linear ordering method, in order to show that it is possible to obtain a ranking that is very similar to the EIS ranking with a reduced number of indicators. These results may be significant, both for units developing this type of ranking and for users, such as decision-makers, using the results to make strategic decisions. In our opinion, this innovative approach—that is, using the linear ordering method and a reduced number of indicators—makes it possible to create a more transparent EIS ranking. This article is of theoretical, methodological, and empirical interest.
topic innovation
European Innovation Scoreboard
EIS
Innovation Union Scoreboard
ranking of innovation
Community Innovation Survey
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2199
work_keys_str_mv AT edytabielinskadusza methodologyforcalculatingtheeuropeaninnovationscoreboardpropositionformodification
AT monikahamerska methodologyforcalculatingtheeuropeaninnovationscoreboardpropositionformodification
_version_ 1724262018493448192