Comparison of 5 × 5 Gy and 10 × 3 Gy for metastatic spinal cord compression using data from three prospective trials

Abstract Background In a palliative situation like metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC), overall treatment time of radiotherapy should be as short as possible. This study compared 5 × 5 Gy in 1 week to 10 × 3 Gy in 2 weeks in a prospective cohort. Methods Forty patients receiving 5 × 5 Gy in a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dirk Rades, Jon Cacicedo, Antonio J. Conde-Moreno, Barbara Segedin, Darejan Lomidze, Raquel Ciervide, Niels H. Hollaender, Steven E. Schild
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-01-01
Series:Radiation Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01737-7
id doaj-f0e4d6745ff8414e82d4866bbcdaf65d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f0e4d6745ff8414e82d4866bbcdaf65d2021-01-10T13:02:53ZengBMCRadiation Oncology1748-717X2021-01-011611510.1186/s13014-020-01737-7Comparison of 5 × 5 Gy and 10 × 3 Gy for metastatic spinal cord compression using data from three prospective trialsDirk Rades0Jon Cacicedo1Antonio J. Conde-Moreno2Barbara Segedin3Darejan Lomidze4Raquel Ciervide5Niels H. Hollaender6Steven E. Schild7Department of Radiation Oncology, University of LübeckDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Health Research InstituteDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University and Polytechnic Hospital La FeDepartment of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology LjubljanaRadiation Oncology Department, HTMC University Clinic TbilisiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital HM HospitalesDepartment of Oncology and Palliative Units, Zealand University HospitalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo ClinicAbstract Background In a palliative situation like metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC), overall treatment time of radiotherapy should be as short as possible. This study compared 5 × 5 Gy in 1 week to 10 × 3 Gy in 2 weeks in a prospective cohort. Methods Forty patients receiving 5 × 5 Gy in a phase II trial were matched 1:2 to 213 patients receiving 10 × 3 Gy in two previous prospective studies for tumor type, ambulatory status, time developing motor deficits, interval between tumor diagnosis and MSCC and visceral metastases. These factors were consistent in all three patients (triple) used for each 1:2 matching. Groups were compared for local progression-free survival (LPFS), motor function, ambulatory status, and overall survival (OS). Results After matching, 32 triples remained for analyses (N = 96 in total). Six-month LPFS-rates were 94% after 5 × 5 Gy and 87% after 10 × 3 Gy (p = 0.36), 6-month OS-rates 43% and 35% (p = 0.74). Improvement of motor function was achieved in 59% and 34% of patients (p = 0.028); overall response rates (improvement or no further progression of motor deficits) were 94% and 89% (p = 0.71). Post-treatment ambulatory rates were 81% after 5 × 5 Gy and 85% after 10 × 3 Gy (p = 0.61). Of non-ambulatory patients, 50% (6/12) and 46% (11/24) regained the ability to walk (p = 1.00). Conclusions 5 × 5 Gy in 1 week appeared similarly effective as 10 × 3 Gy in 2 weeks. These results may not be applicable to long-term survivors and should be confirmed in a randomized trial directly comparing 5 × 5 Gy and 10 × 3 Gy. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov NCT03070431. Registered 27 February 2017.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01737-7Metastatic spinal cord compressionRadiotherapy aloneLocal progression-free survivalMotor functionAmbulatory statusOverall survival
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dirk Rades
Jon Cacicedo
Antonio J. Conde-Moreno
Barbara Segedin
Darejan Lomidze
Raquel Ciervide
Niels H. Hollaender
Steven E. Schild
spellingShingle Dirk Rades
Jon Cacicedo
Antonio J. Conde-Moreno
Barbara Segedin
Darejan Lomidze
Raquel Ciervide
Niels H. Hollaender
Steven E. Schild
Comparison of 5 × 5 Gy and 10 × 3 Gy for metastatic spinal cord compression using data from three prospective trials
Radiation Oncology
Metastatic spinal cord compression
Radiotherapy alone
Local progression-free survival
Motor function
Ambulatory status
Overall survival
author_facet Dirk Rades
Jon Cacicedo
Antonio J. Conde-Moreno
Barbara Segedin
Darejan Lomidze
Raquel Ciervide
Niels H. Hollaender
Steven E. Schild
author_sort Dirk Rades
title Comparison of 5 × 5 Gy and 10 × 3 Gy for metastatic spinal cord compression using data from three prospective trials
title_short Comparison of 5 × 5 Gy and 10 × 3 Gy for metastatic spinal cord compression using data from three prospective trials
title_full Comparison of 5 × 5 Gy and 10 × 3 Gy for metastatic spinal cord compression using data from three prospective trials
title_fullStr Comparison of 5 × 5 Gy and 10 × 3 Gy for metastatic spinal cord compression using data from three prospective trials
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of 5 × 5 Gy and 10 × 3 Gy for metastatic spinal cord compression using data from three prospective trials
title_sort comparison of 5 × 5 gy and 10 × 3 gy for metastatic spinal cord compression using data from three prospective trials
publisher BMC
series Radiation Oncology
issn 1748-717X
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Abstract Background In a palliative situation like metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC), overall treatment time of radiotherapy should be as short as possible. This study compared 5 × 5 Gy in 1 week to 10 × 3 Gy in 2 weeks in a prospective cohort. Methods Forty patients receiving 5 × 5 Gy in a phase II trial were matched 1:2 to 213 patients receiving 10 × 3 Gy in two previous prospective studies for tumor type, ambulatory status, time developing motor deficits, interval between tumor diagnosis and MSCC and visceral metastases. These factors were consistent in all three patients (triple) used for each 1:2 matching. Groups were compared for local progression-free survival (LPFS), motor function, ambulatory status, and overall survival (OS). Results After matching, 32 triples remained for analyses (N = 96 in total). Six-month LPFS-rates were 94% after 5 × 5 Gy and 87% after 10 × 3 Gy (p = 0.36), 6-month OS-rates 43% and 35% (p = 0.74). Improvement of motor function was achieved in 59% and 34% of patients (p = 0.028); overall response rates (improvement or no further progression of motor deficits) were 94% and 89% (p = 0.71). Post-treatment ambulatory rates were 81% after 5 × 5 Gy and 85% after 10 × 3 Gy (p = 0.61). Of non-ambulatory patients, 50% (6/12) and 46% (11/24) regained the ability to walk (p = 1.00). Conclusions 5 × 5 Gy in 1 week appeared similarly effective as 10 × 3 Gy in 2 weeks. These results may not be applicable to long-term survivors and should be confirmed in a randomized trial directly comparing 5 × 5 Gy and 10 × 3 Gy. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov NCT03070431. Registered 27 February 2017.
topic Metastatic spinal cord compression
Radiotherapy alone
Local progression-free survival
Motor function
Ambulatory status
Overall survival
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01737-7
work_keys_str_mv AT dirkrades comparisonof55gyand103gyformetastaticspinalcordcompressionusingdatafromthreeprospectivetrials
AT joncacicedo comparisonof55gyand103gyformetastaticspinalcordcompressionusingdatafromthreeprospectivetrials
AT antoniojcondemoreno comparisonof55gyand103gyformetastaticspinalcordcompressionusingdatafromthreeprospectivetrials
AT barbarasegedin comparisonof55gyand103gyformetastaticspinalcordcompressionusingdatafromthreeprospectivetrials
AT darejanlomidze comparisonof55gyand103gyformetastaticspinalcordcompressionusingdatafromthreeprospectivetrials
AT raquelciervide comparisonof55gyand103gyformetastaticspinalcordcompressionusingdatafromthreeprospectivetrials
AT nielshhollaender comparisonof55gyand103gyformetastaticspinalcordcompressionusingdatafromthreeprospectivetrials
AT steveneschild comparisonof55gyand103gyformetastaticspinalcordcompressionusingdatafromthreeprospectivetrials
_version_ 1724341933510230016