Comparison of 5 × 5 Gy and 10 × 3 Gy for metastatic spinal cord compression using data from three prospective trials
Abstract Background In a palliative situation like metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC), overall treatment time of radiotherapy should be as short as possible. This study compared 5 × 5 Gy in 1 week to 10 × 3 Gy in 2 weeks in a prospective cohort. Methods Forty patients receiving 5 × 5 Gy in a...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Radiation Oncology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01737-7 |
id |
doaj-f0e4d6745ff8414e82d4866bbcdaf65d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f0e4d6745ff8414e82d4866bbcdaf65d2021-01-10T13:02:53ZengBMCRadiation Oncology1748-717X2021-01-011611510.1186/s13014-020-01737-7Comparison of 5 × 5 Gy and 10 × 3 Gy for metastatic spinal cord compression using data from three prospective trialsDirk Rades0Jon Cacicedo1Antonio J. Conde-Moreno2Barbara Segedin3Darejan Lomidze4Raquel Ciervide5Niels H. Hollaender6Steven E. Schild7Department of Radiation Oncology, University of LübeckDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Health Research InstituteDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University and Polytechnic Hospital La FeDepartment of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology LjubljanaRadiation Oncology Department, HTMC University Clinic TbilisiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital HM HospitalesDepartment of Oncology and Palliative Units, Zealand University HospitalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo ClinicAbstract Background In a palliative situation like metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC), overall treatment time of radiotherapy should be as short as possible. This study compared 5 × 5 Gy in 1 week to 10 × 3 Gy in 2 weeks in a prospective cohort. Methods Forty patients receiving 5 × 5 Gy in a phase II trial were matched 1:2 to 213 patients receiving 10 × 3 Gy in two previous prospective studies for tumor type, ambulatory status, time developing motor deficits, interval between tumor diagnosis and MSCC and visceral metastases. These factors were consistent in all three patients (triple) used for each 1:2 matching. Groups were compared for local progression-free survival (LPFS), motor function, ambulatory status, and overall survival (OS). Results After matching, 32 triples remained for analyses (N = 96 in total). Six-month LPFS-rates were 94% after 5 × 5 Gy and 87% after 10 × 3 Gy (p = 0.36), 6-month OS-rates 43% and 35% (p = 0.74). Improvement of motor function was achieved in 59% and 34% of patients (p = 0.028); overall response rates (improvement or no further progression of motor deficits) were 94% and 89% (p = 0.71). Post-treatment ambulatory rates were 81% after 5 × 5 Gy and 85% after 10 × 3 Gy (p = 0.61). Of non-ambulatory patients, 50% (6/12) and 46% (11/24) regained the ability to walk (p = 1.00). Conclusions 5 × 5 Gy in 1 week appeared similarly effective as 10 × 3 Gy in 2 weeks. These results may not be applicable to long-term survivors and should be confirmed in a randomized trial directly comparing 5 × 5 Gy and 10 × 3 Gy. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov NCT03070431. Registered 27 February 2017.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01737-7Metastatic spinal cord compressionRadiotherapy aloneLocal progression-free survivalMotor functionAmbulatory statusOverall survival |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dirk Rades Jon Cacicedo Antonio J. Conde-Moreno Barbara Segedin Darejan Lomidze Raquel Ciervide Niels H. Hollaender Steven E. Schild |
spellingShingle |
Dirk Rades Jon Cacicedo Antonio J. Conde-Moreno Barbara Segedin Darejan Lomidze Raquel Ciervide Niels H. Hollaender Steven E. Schild Comparison of 5 × 5 Gy and 10 × 3 Gy for metastatic spinal cord compression using data from three prospective trials Radiation Oncology Metastatic spinal cord compression Radiotherapy alone Local progression-free survival Motor function Ambulatory status Overall survival |
author_facet |
Dirk Rades Jon Cacicedo Antonio J. Conde-Moreno Barbara Segedin Darejan Lomidze Raquel Ciervide Niels H. Hollaender Steven E. Schild |
author_sort |
Dirk Rades |
title |
Comparison of 5 × 5 Gy and 10 × 3 Gy for metastatic spinal cord compression using data from three prospective trials |
title_short |
Comparison of 5 × 5 Gy and 10 × 3 Gy for metastatic spinal cord compression using data from three prospective trials |
title_full |
Comparison of 5 × 5 Gy and 10 × 3 Gy for metastatic spinal cord compression using data from three prospective trials |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of 5 × 5 Gy and 10 × 3 Gy for metastatic spinal cord compression using data from three prospective trials |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of 5 × 5 Gy and 10 × 3 Gy for metastatic spinal cord compression using data from three prospective trials |
title_sort |
comparison of 5 × 5 gy and 10 × 3 gy for metastatic spinal cord compression using data from three prospective trials |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Radiation Oncology |
issn |
1748-717X |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Abstract Background In a palliative situation like metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC), overall treatment time of radiotherapy should be as short as possible. This study compared 5 × 5 Gy in 1 week to 10 × 3 Gy in 2 weeks in a prospective cohort. Methods Forty patients receiving 5 × 5 Gy in a phase II trial were matched 1:2 to 213 patients receiving 10 × 3 Gy in two previous prospective studies for tumor type, ambulatory status, time developing motor deficits, interval between tumor diagnosis and MSCC and visceral metastases. These factors were consistent in all three patients (triple) used for each 1:2 matching. Groups were compared for local progression-free survival (LPFS), motor function, ambulatory status, and overall survival (OS). Results After matching, 32 triples remained for analyses (N = 96 in total). Six-month LPFS-rates were 94% after 5 × 5 Gy and 87% after 10 × 3 Gy (p = 0.36), 6-month OS-rates 43% and 35% (p = 0.74). Improvement of motor function was achieved in 59% and 34% of patients (p = 0.028); overall response rates (improvement or no further progression of motor deficits) were 94% and 89% (p = 0.71). Post-treatment ambulatory rates were 81% after 5 × 5 Gy and 85% after 10 × 3 Gy (p = 0.61). Of non-ambulatory patients, 50% (6/12) and 46% (11/24) regained the ability to walk (p = 1.00). Conclusions 5 × 5 Gy in 1 week appeared similarly effective as 10 × 3 Gy in 2 weeks. These results may not be applicable to long-term survivors and should be confirmed in a randomized trial directly comparing 5 × 5 Gy and 10 × 3 Gy. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov NCT03070431. Registered 27 February 2017. |
topic |
Metastatic spinal cord compression Radiotherapy alone Local progression-free survival Motor function Ambulatory status Overall survival |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01737-7 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dirkrades comparisonof55gyand103gyformetastaticspinalcordcompressionusingdatafromthreeprospectivetrials AT joncacicedo comparisonof55gyand103gyformetastaticspinalcordcompressionusingdatafromthreeprospectivetrials AT antoniojcondemoreno comparisonof55gyand103gyformetastaticspinalcordcompressionusingdatafromthreeprospectivetrials AT barbarasegedin comparisonof55gyand103gyformetastaticspinalcordcompressionusingdatafromthreeprospectivetrials AT darejanlomidze comparisonof55gyand103gyformetastaticspinalcordcompressionusingdatafromthreeprospectivetrials AT raquelciervide comparisonof55gyand103gyformetastaticspinalcordcompressionusingdatafromthreeprospectivetrials AT nielshhollaender comparisonof55gyand103gyformetastaticspinalcordcompressionusingdatafromthreeprospectivetrials AT steveneschild comparisonof55gyand103gyformetastaticspinalcordcompressionusingdatafromthreeprospectivetrials |
_version_ |
1724341933510230016 |