REDRAWING THE FRONTIERS IN THE AGE OF POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW

REDRAWING THE FRONTIERS IN THE AGE OF POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW

Publication forms the core structure supporting the development and transmission of scientific knowledge. For this reason, it is essential that the highest standards of quality control be maintained, in particular to ensure that the information being transmitted allows reproducible replication of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	David William Galbraith
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-06-01
Series:	Frontiers in Genetics
Subjects:	Scientific Misconduct fraudulent data Internet publication post-publication review Scientific reproducibility
Online Access:	http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fgene.2015.00198/full

Similar Items

Vanity galleries, Pay Drivers and predatory journals: Profitting on discredit
by: David Fabian Ramirez
Published: (2021-01-01)

Retracted publications and their citation in dental literature: A systematic review
by: Antonio Rapani, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01)

EL PLAGIO COMO MANIFESTACIÓN DE FRAUDE EN LAS PUBLICACIONES CIENTÍFICAS / Plagiarism as an expression of fraud in scientific publications
by: Francisco L Moreno-Martínez, et al.
Published: (2011-09-01)

PRINCIPALES DIFICULTADES EN LAS REFERENCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS DE LOS MANUSCRITOS ENVIADOS A CORSALUD / Major problems in the bibliography of the manuscripts submitted to CorSalud
by: Tunia Gil Hernández, et al.
Published: (2011-03-01)

The role of ethics and research integrity in the training of health professionals and in the development of human research
by: Bárbara Niegia Garcia de Goulart, et al.

The changing forms and expectations of peer review
by: S. P. J. M. ( Serge) Horbach, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01)

REFLEXIÓN EDITORIAL A PROPÓSITO DE CARDIOVILLA / Editorial reflection about CardioVilla
by: Yurima Hernández de la Rosa, et al.
Published: (2011-11-01)

Can a librarian safeguard the reliability of the research?
by: Patrycja Kurowska
Published: (2019-12-01)

Aggregating post-publication peer reviews and ratings
by: Răzvan Valentin Florian
Published: (2012-05-01)

The problem with data
by: Lonnie Aarssen
Published: (2016-01-01)

Making the most of peer review
by: Nikolai Slavov
Published: (2015-11-01)

A survey of retracted articles in dentistry
by: Túlio Eduardo Nogueira, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01)

Correcting the literature: Improvement trends seen in contents of retraction notices
by: Evelyne Deculllier, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01)

Authorship: an ethical dilemma of science
by: Maria Christina Anna Grieger

A Survey of Iranian Retracted Publications Indexed in PubMed
by: Mohammad Javad MANSOURZADEH, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)

Is the Ratio of Retracted Iranian Papers Compatible With Their Research Growth Rate? An International Database Survey
by: Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01)

Percepção de integridade científica para o estudante de medicina
by: Patrícia Dias Schmitz, et al.

La Ricerca Biomedica al Tempo di “Publish or Perish”
by: Giuseppe Quintaliani, et al.
Published: (2015-11-01)

Assessing Intellectual Property, Publication Ethics, and Related Legal provisionsin the Islamic Republic of Iran
by: Ali Enjoo
Published: (2011-09-01)

Integridade científica e pesquisa em saúde no Brasil: revisão da literatura
by: Gabriela Cristina Cantisani Pádua, et al.

Retractions in Endocrinology and Metabolism Journals: Causes and Characteristics
by: Marzieh Morovati, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01)

Effectiveness of a 1-day workshop on scientific writing conducted by the Indian journal of rheumatology
by: Mohit Goyal, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

A scoping review of the literature featuring research ethics and research integrity cases
by: Anna Catharina Vieira Armond, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01)

Etika vědecké práce a publikování pro mírně pokročilé. / Research and publishing ethics for junior researchers.
by: Petr Knecht, et al.
Published: (2013-08-01)

Editorial Misconduct—Definition, Cases, and Causes
by: Matan Shelomi
Published: (2014-04-01)

Ethical misconduct by registered physiotherapists in South Africa (2007–2013): A mixed methods approach
by: Willem A. Hoffmann, et al.
Published: (2015-06-01)

Using Cinéma Vérité (Truthful Cinema) to Facilitate Replication and Accountability in Psychological Research
by: Jerry eSuls
Published: (2013-11-01)

A Scientometrics Study of Iranian Retracted Papers
by: Shima Moradi, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01)

The Protocol Gap
by: Michael G. Weller
Published: (2021-02-01)

Google search: A simple and free tool to detect plagiarism
by: Shaikat Mondal, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Roadmap to Stop the Predatory Journals: Author\'s Perspective
by: Amin Talebi
Published: (2017-02-01)

The Demographics of Deception: What Motivates Authors Who Engage in Misconduct?
by: R. Grant Steen
Published: (2014-03-01)

Measuring Scientific Misconduct—Lessons from Criminology
by: Felicitas Hesselmann, et al.
Published: (2014-07-01)

Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Guidelines on good publication practice.
Published: (2000-07-01)

Scientific misconduct
by: Todorović Slobodan, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Zero tolerance to plagiarism will kill inspiration: a critique for academic meritocracy
by: Hans Henrik Bruun
Published: (2014-05-01)

Percepção de plágio acadêmico entre estudantes do curso de odontologia
by: Diego Oliveira Guedes, et al.

Retractions in general and internal medicine in a high-profile scientific indexing database
by: Renan Moritz Varnier Rodrigues de Almeida, et al.

PyRDM: A Python-based library for automating the management and online publication of scientific software and data
by: Christian T. Jacobs, et al.
Published: (2014-10-01)

Pathological publishing: A new psychological disorder with legal consequences?
by: Gualberto Buela-Casal
Published: (2014-07-01)