A novel vaginal pH regulator: results from the phase 3 AMPOWER contraception clinical trial

Objective: The objective was to evaluate the contraceptive effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of a novel vaginal pH regulator over seven cycles of use. Study design: A single-arm, open-label, phase 3 study was conducted across 112 sites in the United States in sexually active 18–35-year-old wo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael A. Thomas, B. Todd Chappell, Bassem Maximos, Kelly R. Culwell, Clint Dart, Brandon Howard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-01-01
Series:Contraception: X
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300149
id doaj-f0bfa0605fd1444e8001533351a193e7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f0bfa0605fd1444e8001533351a193e72020-12-19T05:10:49ZengElsevierContraception: X2590-15162020-01-012100031A novel vaginal pH regulator: results from the phase 3 AMPOWER contraception clinical trialMichael A. Thomas0B. Todd Chappell1Bassem Maximos2Kelly R. Culwell3Clint Dart4Brandon Howard5University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45219, USA; Corresponding author at: University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH 45219. Tel.: +1 513 585 2355.Adams Patterson Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics, 1727 Kirby Parkway, Memphis, TN, 38210, USAMaximos Obstetrics and Gynecology, 651 Egret Bay Boulevard, League City, TX, 77573, USAEvofem Biosciences, Inc., 12400 High Bluff Drive, Suite 600, San Diego, CA, 92130, USAHealth Decisions, 2510 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC, 27713, USAEvofem Biosciences, Inc., 12400 High Bluff Drive, Suite 600, San Diego, CA, 92130, USAObjective: The objective was to evaluate the contraceptive effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of a novel vaginal pH regulator over seven cycles of use. Study design: A single-arm, open-label, phase 3 study was conducted across 112 sites in the United States in sexually active 18–35-year-old women at risk of pregnancy. Women administered the study treatment ≤1 h before each episode of intercourse. Women recorded use of study drug, coital information, and any symptoms experienced in electronic diaries. The primary outcome was the seven-cycle cumulative pregnancy rate as calculated using the Kaplan–Meier methodology; secondary outcomes included safety. Overall satisfaction was assessed via written questionnaires. Results: A total of 1384 women were enrolled in the study from July 2017 to November 2018. Mean age was 27.7 ± 4.4 years; most women were white (69.0%). The seven-cycle cumulative pregnancy percentage was 13.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 10.0%–17.5%], meeting the prespecified primary endpoint of having the upper bound 95% CI ≤21%. Most common adverse events (AEs) occurring in ≥2% of women were vulvovaginal burning sensation, vulvovaginal pruritus, urinary tract infection, vulvovaginal pain, mycotic infection, bacterial vaginosis, and nasopharyngitis. Of 1330 women who used the study drug at least once, fewer than 2% of women discontinued due to any AEs, and <1% of women discontinued due to genitourinary symptoms. Overall, >80% of women reported being “very satisfied” or “satisfied” with study treatment. Conclusions: In this phase 3 study, the novel vaginal pH regulator demonstrated 86.3% contraceptive effectiveness, was safe and well tolerated, and was highly acceptable. Implications: This novel vaginal pH regulator is a safe, nonhormonal, woman-controlled method of contraception that expands women's options.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300149ContraceptionNonhormonalVaginal gelPhase 3 trial
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael A. Thomas
B. Todd Chappell
Bassem Maximos
Kelly R. Culwell
Clint Dart
Brandon Howard
spellingShingle Michael A. Thomas
B. Todd Chappell
Bassem Maximos
Kelly R. Culwell
Clint Dart
Brandon Howard
A novel vaginal pH regulator: results from the phase 3 AMPOWER contraception clinical trial
Contraception: X
Contraception
Nonhormonal
Vaginal gel
Phase 3 trial
author_facet Michael A. Thomas
B. Todd Chappell
Bassem Maximos
Kelly R. Culwell
Clint Dart
Brandon Howard
author_sort Michael A. Thomas
title A novel vaginal pH regulator: results from the phase 3 AMPOWER contraception clinical trial
title_short A novel vaginal pH regulator: results from the phase 3 AMPOWER contraception clinical trial
title_full A novel vaginal pH regulator: results from the phase 3 AMPOWER contraception clinical trial
title_fullStr A novel vaginal pH regulator: results from the phase 3 AMPOWER contraception clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed A novel vaginal pH regulator: results from the phase 3 AMPOWER contraception clinical trial
title_sort novel vaginal ph regulator: results from the phase 3 ampower contraception clinical trial
publisher Elsevier
series Contraception: X
issn 2590-1516
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Objective: The objective was to evaluate the contraceptive effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of a novel vaginal pH regulator over seven cycles of use. Study design: A single-arm, open-label, phase 3 study was conducted across 112 sites in the United States in sexually active 18–35-year-old women at risk of pregnancy. Women administered the study treatment ≤1 h before each episode of intercourse. Women recorded use of study drug, coital information, and any symptoms experienced in electronic diaries. The primary outcome was the seven-cycle cumulative pregnancy rate as calculated using the Kaplan–Meier methodology; secondary outcomes included safety. Overall satisfaction was assessed via written questionnaires. Results: A total of 1384 women were enrolled in the study from July 2017 to November 2018. Mean age was 27.7 ± 4.4 years; most women were white (69.0%). The seven-cycle cumulative pregnancy percentage was 13.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 10.0%–17.5%], meeting the prespecified primary endpoint of having the upper bound 95% CI ≤21%. Most common adverse events (AEs) occurring in ≥2% of women were vulvovaginal burning sensation, vulvovaginal pruritus, urinary tract infection, vulvovaginal pain, mycotic infection, bacterial vaginosis, and nasopharyngitis. Of 1330 women who used the study drug at least once, fewer than 2% of women discontinued due to any AEs, and <1% of women discontinued due to genitourinary symptoms. Overall, >80% of women reported being “very satisfied” or “satisfied” with study treatment. Conclusions: In this phase 3 study, the novel vaginal pH regulator demonstrated 86.3% contraceptive effectiveness, was safe and well tolerated, and was highly acceptable. Implications: This novel vaginal pH regulator is a safe, nonhormonal, woman-controlled method of contraception that expands women's options.
topic Contraception
Nonhormonal
Vaginal gel
Phase 3 trial
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300149
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelathomas anovelvaginalphregulatorresultsfromthephase3ampowercontraceptionclinicaltrial
AT btoddchappell anovelvaginalphregulatorresultsfromthephase3ampowercontraceptionclinicaltrial
AT bassemmaximos anovelvaginalphregulatorresultsfromthephase3ampowercontraceptionclinicaltrial
AT kellyrculwell anovelvaginalphregulatorresultsfromthephase3ampowercontraceptionclinicaltrial
AT clintdart anovelvaginalphregulatorresultsfromthephase3ampowercontraceptionclinicaltrial
AT brandonhoward anovelvaginalphregulatorresultsfromthephase3ampowercontraceptionclinicaltrial
AT michaelathomas novelvaginalphregulatorresultsfromthephase3ampowercontraceptionclinicaltrial
AT btoddchappell novelvaginalphregulatorresultsfromthephase3ampowercontraceptionclinicaltrial
AT bassemmaximos novelvaginalphregulatorresultsfromthephase3ampowercontraceptionclinicaltrial
AT kellyrculwell novelvaginalphregulatorresultsfromthephase3ampowercontraceptionclinicaltrial
AT clintdart novelvaginalphregulatorresultsfromthephase3ampowercontraceptionclinicaltrial
AT brandonhoward novelvaginalphregulatorresultsfromthephase3ampowercontraceptionclinicaltrial
_version_ 1724377582119419904