Individual differences in cognitive processing for roughness rating of fine and coarse textures.

Previous studies have demonstrated that skin vibration is an important factor affecting the roughness perception of fine textures. For coarse textures, the determining physical factor is much less clear and there are indications that this might be participant-dependent. In this paper, we focused on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Makiko Natsume, Yoshihiro Tanaka, Astrid M L Kappers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211407
id doaj-f0a31a31a9024595afa4d5e84bfd52f2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f0a31a31a9024595afa4d5e84bfd52f22021-03-03T20:55:31ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01141e021140710.1371/journal.pone.0211407Individual differences in cognitive processing for roughness rating of fine and coarse textures.Makiko NatsumeYoshihiro TanakaAstrid M L KappersPrevious studies have demonstrated that skin vibration is an important factor affecting the roughness perception of fine textures. For coarse textures, the determining physical factor is much less clear and there are indications that this might be participant-dependent. In this paper, we focused on roughness perception of both coarse and fine textures of different materials (glass particle surfaces and sandpapers). We investigated the relationship between subjective roughness ratings and three physical parameters (skin vibration, friction coefficient, and particle size) within a group of 30 participants. Results of the glass particle surfaces showed both spatial information (particle size) and temporal information (skin vibration) had a high correlation with subjective roughness ratings. The former correlation was slightly but significantly higher than the latter. The results also indicated different weights of temporal information and spatial information for roughness ratings among participants. Roughness ratings of a different material (sandpaper versus glass particles) could be either larger, similar or smaller, indicating differences among individuals. The best way to describe our results is that in their perceptual evaluation of roughness, different individuals weight temporal information, spatial information, and other mechanical properties differently.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211407
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Makiko Natsume
Yoshihiro Tanaka
Astrid M L Kappers
spellingShingle Makiko Natsume
Yoshihiro Tanaka
Astrid M L Kappers
Individual differences in cognitive processing for roughness rating of fine and coarse textures.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Makiko Natsume
Yoshihiro Tanaka
Astrid M L Kappers
author_sort Makiko Natsume
title Individual differences in cognitive processing for roughness rating of fine and coarse textures.
title_short Individual differences in cognitive processing for roughness rating of fine and coarse textures.
title_full Individual differences in cognitive processing for roughness rating of fine and coarse textures.
title_fullStr Individual differences in cognitive processing for roughness rating of fine and coarse textures.
title_full_unstemmed Individual differences in cognitive processing for roughness rating of fine and coarse textures.
title_sort individual differences in cognitive processing for roughness rating of fine and coarse textures.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Previous studies have demonstrated that skin vibration is an important factor affecting the roughness perception of fine textures. For coarse textures, the determining physical factor is much less clear and there are indications that this might be participant-dependent. In this paper, we focused on roughness perception of both coarse and fine textures of different materials (glass particle surfaces and sandpapers). We investigated the relationship between subjective roughness ratings and three physical parameters (skin vibration, friction coefficient, and particle size) within a group of 30 participants. Results of the glass particle surfaces showed both spatial information (particle size) and temporal information (skin vibration) had a high correlation with subjective roughness ratings. The former correlation was slightly but significantly higher than the latter. The results also indicated different weights of temporal information and spatial information for roughness ratings among participants. Roughness ratings of a different material (sandpaper versus glass particles) could be either larger, similar or smaller, indicating differences among individuals. The best way to describe our results is that in their perceptual evaluation of roughness, different individuals weight temporal information, spatial information, and other mechanical properties differently.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211407
work_keys_str_mv AT makikonatsume individualdifferencesincognitiveprocessingforroughnessratingoffineandcoarsetextures
AT yoshihirotanaka individualdifferencesincognitiveprocessingforroughnessratingoffineandcoarsetextures
AT astridmlkappers individualdifferencesincognitiveprocessingforroughnessratingoffineandcoarsetextures
_version_ 1714819831693312000