TRAKTEXT: Investigating writing processes using eye-tracking technology

The purpose of this research was to provide a brief review of existing writing research methodologies, describe a new methodology in the investigation of writing, and demonstrate how this new methodology can be used in a pilot study to investigate the use of writing during problem solving. Our new m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Douglas J Hacker, Matt C Keener, John C Kircher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-12-01
Series:Methodological Innovations
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799116689574
id doaj-f097131ca4e348fb9ff8f8d00e1dfed5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f097131ca4e348fb9ff8f8d00e1dfed52020-11-25T03:52:34ZengSAGE PublishingMethodological Innovations2059-79912017-12-011010.1177/2059799116689574TRAKTEXT: Investigating writing processes using eye-tracking technologyDouglas J HackerMatt C KeenerJohn C KircherThe purpose of this research was to provide a brief review of existing writing research methodologies, describe a new methodology in the investigation of writing, and demonstrate how this new methodology can be used in a pilot study to investigate the use of writing during problem solving. Our new methodology, TRAKTEXT, makes use of eye-tracking technology, which provides continuous measures of processing time, attention, and effort; does not disrupt the writer from the main task; produces data reflecting attentional shifts in periods of time as short as 100 milliseconds; can pinpoint text production or revision at the word level; and provides a more natural way of examining writing behaviors. In our exploratory study, we identified six unique writing behaviors. Results from the pilot study showed that writers who experienced a change in knowledge during problem solving demonstrated different writing behaviors from writers who did not experience a change in knowledge. Although TRAKTEXT provides several advantages over existing writing research methodologies, there are some components of writing (e.g. planning) that must be inferred from processing time and cognitive effort measures. Future iterations of TRAKTEXT may resolve these issues.https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799116689574
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Douglas J Hacker
Matt C Keener
John C Kircher
spellingShingle Douglas J Hacker
Matt C Keener
John C Kircher
TRAKTEXT: Investigating writing processes using eye-tracking technology
Methodological Innovations
author_facet Douglas J Hacker
Matt C Keener
John C Kircher
author_sort Douglas J Hacker
title TRAKTEXT: Investigating writing processes using eye-tracking technology
title_short TRAKTEXT: Investigating writing processes using eye-tracking technology
title_full TRAKTEXT: Investigating writing processes using eye-tracking technology
title_fullStr TRAKTEXT: Investigating writing processes using eye-tracking technology
title_full_unstemmed TRAKTEXT: Investigating writing processes using eye-tracking technology
title_sort traktext: investigating writing processes using eye-tracking technology
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Methodological Innovations
issn 2059-7991
publishDate 2017-12-01
description The purpose of this research was to provide a brief review of existing writing research methodologies, describe a new methodology in the investigation of writing, and demonstrate how this new methodology can be used in a pilot study to investigate the use of writing during problem solving. Our new methodology, TRAKTEXT, makes use of eye-tracking technology, which provides continuous measures of processing time, attention, and effort; does not disrupt the writer from the main task; produces data reflecting attentional shifts in periods of time as short as 100 milliseconds; can pinpoint text production or revision at the word level; and provides a more natural way of examining writing behaviors. In our exploratory study, we identified six unique writing behaviors. Results from the pilot study showed that writers who experienced a change in knowledge during problem solving demonstrated different writing behaviors from writers who did not experience a change in knowledge. Although TRAKTEXT provides several advantages over existing writing research methodologies, there are some components of writing (e.g. planning) that must be inferred from processing time and cognitive effort measures. Future iterations of TRAKTEXT may resolve these issues.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799116689574
work_keys_str_mv AT douglasjhacker traktextinvestigatingwritingprocessesusingeyetrackingtechnology
AT mattckeener traktextinvestigatingwritingprocessesusingeyetrackingtechnology
AT johnckircher traktextinvestigatingwritingprocessesusingeyetrackingtechnology
_version_ 1724482090207019008