Some Disagreements with the Concept of “Consent” in Criminal Proceedings

The present article is a continuation of the author's publications which can be entitled "The Quality of Criminal Procedural Legislation". The estimate made led to critical judgements of the content of the definition "consent" given in Article 5 of the Criminal Procedural Co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pavel G. Marfitsin
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Omsk Law Academy 2016-09-01
Series:Сибирское юридическое обозрение
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/589
id doaj-f096ed3e7b21406aa7d52003ca6ff9b3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f096ed3e7b21406aa7d52003ca6ff9b32021-07-09T07:14:31ZrusOmsk Law AcademyСибирское юридическое обозрение2658-76022658-76102016-09-0103656810.19073/2306-1340-2016-3-65-68561Some Disagreements with the Concept of “Consent” in Criminal ProceedingsPavel G. Marfitsin0Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny NovgorodThe present article is a continuation of the author's publications which can be entitled "The Quality of Criminal Procedural Legislation". The estimate made led to critical judgements of the content of the definition "consent" given in Article 5 of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation and reckoned by the legislator among the main concepts. The author gives grounds and makes suggestions for improvements in the legislation.https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/589уголовное судопроизводствоосновные понятиясогласиесубъектыпроцедураруководитель следственного органапрокурорследовательдознавательcriminal proceedingsmain conceptsconsentsubjectsprocedurechief of investigation bodyprosecutorinvestigatorinterrogator
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pavel G. Marfitsin
spellingShingle Pavel G. Marfitsin
Some Disagreements with the Concept of “Consent” in Criminal Proceedings
Сибирское юридическое обозрение
уголовное судопроизводство
основные понятия
согласие
субъекты
процедура
руководитель следственного органа
прокурор
следователь
дознаватель
criminal proceedings
main concepts
consent
subjects
procedure
chief of investigation body
prosecutor
investigator
interrogator
author_facet Pavel G. Marfitsin
author_sort Pavel G. Marfitsin
title Some Disagreements with the Concept of “Consent” in Criminal Proceedings
title_short Some Disagreements with the Concept of “Consent” in Criminal Proceedings
title_full Some Disagreements with the Concept of “Consent” in Criminal Proceedings
title_fullStr Some Disagreements with the Concept of “Consent” in Criminal Proceedings
title_full_unstemmed Some Disagreements with the Concept of “Consent” in Criminal Proceedings
title_sort some disagreements with the concept of “consent” in criminal proceedings
publisher Omsk Law Academy
series Сибирское юридическое обозрение
issn 2658-7602
2658-7610
publishDate 2016-09-01
description The present article is a continuation of the author's publications which can be entitled "The Quality of Criminal Procedural Legislation". The estimate made led to critical judgements of the content of the definition "consent" given in Article 5 of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation and reckoned by the legislator among the main concepts. The author gives grounds and makes suggestions for improvements in the legislation.
topic уголовное судопроизводство
основные понятия
согласие
субъекты
процедура
руководитель следственного органа
прокурор
следователь
дознаватель
criminal proceedings
main concepts
consent
subjects
procedure
chief of investigation body
prosecutor
investigator
interrogator
url https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/589
work_keys_str_mv AT pavelgmarfitsin somedisagreementswiththeconceptofconsentincriminalproceedings
_version_ 1721311782162661376