Biofeedback efficacy to improve clinical symptoms and endoscopic signs of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is often resistant to medical and surgical treatment. This study assessed the effect of biofeedback in decreasing the symptoms and the healing of endoscopic signs in SRUS patients. Before starting the treatment, endoscopy and colorectal manometry was performed t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mojgan Forootan, Masood Shekarchizadeh, Hamedreza Farmanara, Ahmad Reza Shekarchizadeh Esfahani, Mansooreh Shekarchizadeh Esfahani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PAGEPress Publications 2018-03-01
Series:European Journal of Translational Myology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.pagepressjournals.org/index.php/bam/article/view/7327
id doaj-f0764878eebc40c3b322a304a1be9649
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f0764878eebc40c3b322a304a1be96492020-11-24T23:53:50ZengPAGEPress PublicationsEuropean Journal of Translational Myology2037-74522037-74602018-03-0128110.4081/ejtm.2018.73275593Biofeedback efficacy to improve clinical symptoms and endoscopic signs of solitary rectal ulcer syndromeMojgan Forootan0Masood Shekarchizadeh1Hamedreza Farmanara2Ahmad Reza Shekarchizadeh Esfahani3Mansooreh Shekarchizadeh Esfahani4Department of Gastroenterology, Taleghani Hospital, Medical School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, TehranDepartment of Internal Medicine, Imam Hossein Hospital, Medical School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Rajaei Cardiovascular, Medical & Research Center, TehranDepartment of Sport Medicine, Medical School, Iran University of Medical Science,TehranDepartment of Managment, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, NajafabadDepartment of Gastroenterology, Taleghani Hospital, Medical School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, TehranSolitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is often resistant to medical and surgical treatment. This study assessed the effect of biofeedback in decreasing the symptoms and the healing of endoscopic signs in SRUS patients. Before starting the treatment, endoscopy and colorectal manometry was performed to evaluate dyssynergic defecation. Patients were followed every four weeks, and during each visit their response to treatment was evaluated regarding to manometry pattern. After at least 50% improvement in manometry parameters, recipients underwent rectosigmoidoscopy. Endoscopic response to biofeedback treatment and clinical symptoms were investigated. Duration of symptoms was 43.11±36.42 months in responder and 63.9±45.74 months in non-responder group (P=0.22). There were more ulcers in non-responder group than responder group (1.50±0.71 versus 1.33±-0.71 before and 1.30 ± 0.95 versus 0.67±0.50 after biofeedback), although the difference was not significant (P=0.604, 0.10 respectively). The most prevalent symptoms were constipation (79%), rectal bleeding (68%) and anorectal pain (53%). The most notable improvement in symptoms after biofeedback occured in abdominal pain and incomplete evacuation, and the least was seen in mucosal discharge and toilet waiting as shown in the bar chart. Endoscopic cure was observed in 4 of 10 patients of the non-responder group while 8 patients in responder group experienced endoscopic improvement. It seems that biofeedback has significant effect for pathophysiologic symptoms such as incomplete evacuation and obstructive defecation. Improvement of clinical symptoms does not mean endoscopic cure; so to demonstrate remission the patients have to go under rectosigmoidoscopy.http://www.pagepressjournals.org/index.php/bam/article/view/7327Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, endoscopy, colorectal manometry, dyssynergic
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mojgan Forootan
Masood Shekarchizadeh
Hamedreza Farmanara
Ahmad Reza Shekarchizadeh Esfahani
Mansooreh Shekarchizadeh Esfahani
spellingShingle Mojgan Forootan
Masood Shekarchizadeh
Hamedreza Farmanara
Ahmad Reza Shekarchizadeh Esfahani
Mansooreh Shekarchizadeh Esfahani
Biofeedback efficacy to improve clinical symptoms and endoscopic signs of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome
European Journal of Translational Myology
Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, endoscopy, colorectal manometry, dyssynergic
author_facet Mojgan Forootan
Masood Shekarchizadeh
Hamedreza Farmanara
Ahmad Reza Shekarchizadeh Esfahani
Mansooreh Shekarchizadeh Esfahani
author_sort Mojgan Forootan
title Biofeedback efficacy to improve clinical symptoms and endoscopic signs of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome
title_short Biofeedback efficacy to improve clinical symptoms and endoscopic signs of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome
title_full Biofeedback efficacy to improve clinical symptoms and endoscopic signs of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome
title_fullStr Biofeedback efficacy to improve clinical symptoms and endoscopic signs of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Biofeedback efficacy to improve clinical symptoms and endoscopic signs of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome
title_sort biofeedback efficacy to improve clinical symptoms and endoscopic signs of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome
publisher PAGEPress Publications
series European Journal of Translational Myology
issn 2037-7452
2037-7460
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is often resistant to medical and surgical treatment. This study assessed the effect of biofeedback in decreasing the symptoms and the healing of endoscopic signs in SRUS patients. Before starting the treatment, endoscopy and colorectal manometry was performed to evaluate dyssynergic defecation. Patients were followed every four weeks, and during each visit their response to treatment was evaluated regarding to manometry pattern. After at least 50% improvement in manometry parameters, recipients underwent rectosigmoidoscopy. Endoscopic response to biofeedback treatment and clinical symptoms were investigated. Duration of symptoms was 43.11±36.42 months in responder and 63.9±45.74 months in non-responder group (P=0.22). There were more ulcers in non-responder group than responder group (1.50±0.71 versus 1.33±-0.71 before and 1.30 ± 0.95 versus 0.67±0.50 after biofeedback), although the difference was not significant (P=0.604, 0.10 respectively). The most prevalent symptoms were constipation (79%), rectal bleeding (68%) and anorectal pain (53%). The most notable improvement in symptoms after biofeedback occured in abdominal pain and incomplete evacuation, and the least was seen in mucosal discharge and toilet waiting as shown in the bar chart. Endoscopic cure was observed in 4 of 10 patients of the non-responder group while 8 patients in responder group experienced endoscopic improvement. It seems that biofeedback has significant effect for pathophysiologic symptoms such as incomplete evacuation and obstructive defecation. Improvement of clinical symptoms does not mean endoscopic cure; so to demonstrate remission the patients have to go under rectosigmoidoscopy.
topic Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, endoscopy, colorectal manometry, dyssynergic
url http://www.pagepressjournals.org/index.php/bam/article/view/7327
work_keys_str_mv AT mojganforootan biofeedbackefficacytoimproveclinicalsymptomsandendoscopicsignsofsolitaryrectalulcersyndrome
AT masoodshekarchizadeh biofeedbackefficacytoimproveclinicalsymptomsandendoscopicsignsofsolitaryrectalulcersyndrome
AT hamedrezafarmanara biofeedbackefficacytoimproveclinicalsymptomsandendoscopicsignsofsolitaryrectalulcersyndrome
AT ahmadrezashekarchizadehesfahani biofeedbackefficacytoimproveclinicalsymptomsandendoscopicsignsofsolitaryrectalulcersyndrome
AT mansoorehshekarchizadehesfahani biofeedbackefficacytoimproveclinicalsymptomsandendoscopicsignsofsolitaryrectalulcersyndrome
_version_ 1725468406335930368