An Ergonomic Assessment Of Four Different Donor Nephrectomy Approaches For The Surgeons And Their Assistants

Baptiste Marçon,1 Willy Ngueyon Sime,2 Francis Guillemin,2 Nicolas Hubert,1 François Lagrange,1 Céline Huselstein,3 Jacques Hubert1,4 1Department of Urology, University Hospital Nancy-Brabois, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Nancy 54511, France; 2Clinical E...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marçon B, Ngueyon Sime W, Guillemin F, Hubert N, Lagrange F, Huselstein C, Hubert J
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2019-09-01
Series:Research and Reports in Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/an-ergonomic-assessment-of-four-different-donor-nephrectomy-approaches-peer-reviewed-article-RRU
id doaj-f0696855749340fc87669dbe9c5b685f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f0696855749340fc87669dbe9c5b685f2020-11-25T02:08:39ZengDove Medical PressResearch and Reports in Urology2253-24472019-09-01Volume 1126126848857An Ergonomic Assessment Of Four Different Donor Nephrectomy Approaches For The Surgeons And Their AssistantsMarçon BNgueyon Sime WGuillemin FHubert NLagrange FHuselstein CHubert JBaptiste Marçon,1 Willy Ngueyon Sime,2 Francis Guillemin,2 Nicolas Hubert,1 François Lagrange,1 Céline Huselstein,3 Jacques Hubert1,4 1Department of Urology, University Hospital Nancy-Brabois, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Nancy 54511, France; 2Clinical Epidemiology Center Inserm CIC-EC 1433, University Hospital Nancy-Brabois, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Nancy 54505, France; 3Department of Health Sciences and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Lorraine University, Nancy, France; 4IADI-UL-INSERM (U1254), University Hospital Nancy-Brabois, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Nancy 54511, FranceCorrespondence: Baptiste MarçonDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Nancy-Brabois, Allée du Morvan, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Nancy 54511, FranceTel +33 06 75 08 86 01Email baptistemarcon@orange.frIntroduction: Open surgery is increasingly being replaced by laparoscopic approaches that are more demanding for the surgical team. The physical and mental workload of these approaches have not been quantified.Materials and methods: A multicenter prospective study was performed evaluating the physical and mental stresses of 4 surgical approaches (open surgery [OS], standard laparoscopy [SL], hand-assisted laparoscopy [HAL], and robot-assisted laparoscopy [RAL]) for donor nephrectomy for the surgeon and their assistant. The Borg Scale was used to evaluate exertion in different body parts every 30 mins during surgery and the NASA-TLX score was used to evaluate overall workload.Results: 264 nephrectomies were performed over a 33-month period and 258 questionnaires evaluating these surgeries were obtained. Surgeons experienced less left shoulder and arm exertion and left forearm and hand exertion, but greater lower back exertion, as measured by the Borg scale, with RAL. Leg exertion was significantly greater with OS. Assistant surgeons experienced increased exertion in the back, right shoulder and arm, and right forearm and hand with RAL. NASA Task load index (TLX) surgeon scores showed mental demand was similar for all 4 surgical approaches. Physical demand was lower and overall performance was higher with RAL.Discussion: Four different nephrectomy surgical approaches were evaluated in a multicenter setting. Surgeon and assistant scores of physical exertions were generally in the “easy” range but confirmed that robotic surgery is an ergonomic progress compared to other techniques, except for the axial skeleton. Further, it degrades the working conditions for the assistant.Keywords: ergonomics, surgery, nephrectomy, laparoscopy, robot, bed-side assistant, living donorhttps://www.dovepress.com/an-ergonomic-assessment-of-four-different-donor-nephrectomy-approaches-peer-reviewed-article-RRUergonomicssurgerynephrectomylaparoscopyrobotbed-side assistantliving donor
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marçon B
Ngueyon Sime W
Guillemin F
Hubert N
Lagrange F
Huselstein C
Hubert J
spellingShingle Marçon B
Ngueyon Sime W
Guillemin F
Hubert N
Lagrange F
Huselstein C
Hubert J
An Ergonomic Assessment Of Four Different Donor Nephrectomy Approaches For The Surgeons And Their Assistants
Research and Reports in Urology
ergonomics
surgery
nephrectomy
laparoscopy
robot
bed-side assistant
living donor
author_facet Marçon B
Ngueyon Sime W
Guillemin F
Hubert N
Lagrange F
Huselstein C
Hubert J
author_sort Marçon B
title An Ergonomic Assessment Of Four Different Donor Nephrectomy Approaches For The Surgeons And Their Assistants
title_short An Ergonomic Assessment Of Four Different Donor Nephrectomy Approaches For The Surgeons And Their Assistants
title_full An Ergonomic Assessment Of Four Different Donor Nephrectomy Approaches For The Surgeons And Their Assistants
title_fullStr An Ergonomic Assessment Of Four Different Donor Nephrectomy Approaches For The Surgeons And Their Assistants
title_full_unstemmed An Ergonomic Assessment Of Four Different Donor Nephrectomy Approaches For The Surgeons And Their Assistants
title_sort ergonomic assessment of four different donor nephrectomy approaches for the surgeons and their assistants
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Research and Reports in Urology
issn 2253-2447
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Baptiste Marçon,1 Willy Ngueyon Sime,2 Francis Guillemin,2 Nicolas Hubert,1 François Lagrange,1 Céline Huselstein,3 Jacques Hubert1,4 1Department of Urology, University Hospital Nancy-Brabois, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Nancy 54511, France; 2Clinical Epidemiology Center Inserm CIC-EC 1433, University Hospital Nancy-Brabois, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Nancy 54505, France; 3Department of Health Sciences and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Lorraine University, Nancy, France; 4IADI-UL-INSERM (U1254), University Hospital Nancy-Brabois, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Nancy 54511, FranceCorrespondence: Baptiste MarçonDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Nancy-Brabois, Allée du Morvan, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Nancy 54511, FranceTel +33 06 75 08 86 01Email baptistemarcon@orange.frIntroduction: Open surgery is increasingly being replaced by laparoscopic approaches that are more demanding for the surgical team. The physical and mental workload of these approaches have not been quantified.Materials and methods: A multicenter prospective study was performed evaluating the physical and mental stresses of 4 surgical approaches (open surgery [OS], standard laparoscopy [SL], hand-assisted laparoscopy [HAL], and robot-assisted laparoscopy [RAL]) for donor nephrectomy for the surgeon and their assistant. The Borg Scale was used to evaluate exertion in different body parts every 30 mins during surgery and the NASA-TLX score was used to evaluate overall workload.Results: 264 nephrectomies were performed over a 33-month period and 258 questionnaires evaluating these surgeries were obtained. Surgeons experienced less left shoulder and arm exertion and left forearm and hand exertion, but greater lower back exertion, as measured by the Borg scale, with RAL. Leg exertion was significantly greater with OS. Assistant surgeons experienced increased exertion in the back, right shoulder and arm, and right forearm and hand with RAL. NASA Task load index (TLX) surgeon scores showed mental demand was similar for all 4 surgical approaches. Physical demand was lower and overall performance was higher with RAL.Discussion: Four different nephrectomy surgical approaches were evaluated in a multicenter setting. Surgeon and assistant scores of physical exertions were generally in the “easy” range but confirmed that robotic surgery is an ergonomic progress compared to other techniques, except for the axial skeleton. Further, it degrades the working conditions for the assistant.Keywords: ergonomics, surgery, nephrectomy, laparoscopy, robot, bed-side assistant, living donor
topic ergonomics
surgery
nephrectomy
laparoscopy
robot
bed-side assistant
living donor
url https://www.dovepress.com/an-ergonomic-assessment-of-four-different-donor-nephrectomy-approaches-peer-reviewed-article-RRU
work_keys_str_mv AT marconb anergonomicassessmentoffourdifferentdonornephrectomyapproachesforthesurgeonsandtheirassistants
AT ngueyonsimew anergonomicassessmentoffourdifferentdonornephrectomyapproachesforthesurgeonsandtheirassistants
AT guilleminf anergonomicassessmentoffourdifferentdonornephrectomyapproachesforthesurgeonsandtheirassistants
AT hubertn anergonomicassessmentoffourdifferentdonornephrectomyapproachesforthesurgeonsandtheirassistants
AT lagrangef anergonomicassessmentoffourdifferentdonornephrectomyapproachesforthesurgeonsandtheirassistants
AT huselsteinc anergonomicassessmentoffourdifferentdonornephrectomyapproachesforthesurgeonsandtheirassistants
AT hubertj anergonomicassessmentoffourdifferentdonornephrectomyapproachesforthesurgeonsandtheirassistants
AT marconb ergonomicassessmentoffourdifferentdonornephrectomyapproachesforthesurgeonsandtheirassistants
AT ngueyonsimew ergonomicassessmentoffourdifferentdonornephrectomyapproachesforthesurgeonsandtheirassistants
AT guilleminf ergonomicassessmentoffourdifferentdonornephrectomyapproachesforthesurgeonsandtheirassistants
AT hubertn ergonomicassessmentoffourdifferentdonornephrectomyapproachesforthesurgeonsandtheirassistants
AT lagrangef ergonomicassessmentoffourdifferentdonornephrectomyapproachesforthesurgeonsandtheirassistants
AT huselsteinc ergonomicassessmentoffourdifferentdonornephrectomyapproachesforthesurgeonsandtheirassistants
AT hubertj ergonomicassessmentoffourdifferentdonornephrectomyapproachesforthesurgeonsandtheirassistants
_version_ 1724926247370227712