Fertility-Dependent Acoustic Variation in Women’s Voices Previously Shown to Affect Listener Physiology and Perception

Previous research demonstrates that listeners perceive women’s voices as more attractive when recorded at high compared to low fertility phases of the menstrual cycle. This effect has been repeated with multiple voice recording samples, but one stimuli set has shown particularly robust replications....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Melanie L. Shoup-Knox, Grant M. Ostrander, Gabrielle E. Reimann, R. Nathan Pipitone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-04-01
Series:Evolutionary Psychology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704919843103
id doaj-f049027199e140fcacebf129bfd4e7f1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f049027199e140fcacebf129bfd4e7f12020-11-25T03:43:39ZengSAGE PublishingEvolutionary Psychology1474-70492019-04-011710.1177/1474704919843103Fertility-Dependent Acoustic Variation in Women’s Voices Previously Shown to Affect Listener Physiology and PerceptionMelanie L. Shoup-Knox0Grant M. Ostrander1Gabrielle E. Reimann2R. Nathan Pipitone3 Psychology Department, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA Psychology Department, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA Psychology Department, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA Department of Psychology, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, FL, USAPrevious research demonstrates that listeners perceive women’s voices as more attractive when recorded at high compared to low fertility phases of the menstrual cycle. This effect has been repeated with multiple voice recording samples, but one stimuli set has shown particularly robust replications. First collected by Pipitone and Gallup (2008), women were recorded counting from 1–10 on approximately the same day and time once a week for 4 weeks. Repeatedly, studies using these recordings have shown that naturally cycling women recorded at high fertility are rated as more attractive compared to voices of the same women at low fertility. Additionally, these stimuli have been shown to elicit autonomic nervous system arousal and precipitate a rise in testosterone levels among listeners. Although previous studies have examined the acoustic properties of voices across the menstrual cycle, they reach little consensus. The current study evaluates Pipitone and Gallup’s voice stimuli from an acoustic perspective, analyzing specific vocal characteristics of both naturally cycling women and women taking hormonal contraceptives. Results show that among naturally cycling women, variation in vocal amplitude (shimmer) was significantly lower in high fertility recordings compared to the women’s voices at low fertility. Harmonics-to-noise ratio and variation in voice pitch (jitter) also fluctuated systematically across voices sampled at different times during the menstrual cycle, though these effects were not statistically significant. It is possible that these acoustic changes could account for some of the replicated perceptual, hormonal, and physiological changes documented in prior literature using these voice stimuli.https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704919843103
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Melanie L. Shoup-Knox
Grant M. Ostrander
Gabrielle E. Reimann
R. Nathan Pipitone
spellingShingle Melanie L. Shoup-Knox
Grant M. Ostrander
Gabrielle E. Reimann
R. Nathan Pipitone
Fertility-Dependent Acoustic Variation in Women’s Voices Previously Shown to Affect Listener Physiology and Perception
Evolutionary Psychology
author_facet Melanie L. Shoup-Knox
Grant M. Ostrander
Gabrielle E. Reimann
R. Nathan Pipitone
author_sort Melanie L. Shoup-Knox
title Fertility-Dependent Acoustic Variation in Women’s Voices Previously Shown to Affect Listener Physiology and Perception
title_short Fertility-Dependent Acoustic Variation in Women’s Voices Previously Shown to Affect Listener Physiology and Perception
title_full Fertility-Dependent Acoustic Variation in Women’s Voices Previously Shown to Affect Listener Physiology and Perception
title_fullStr Fertility-Dependent Acoustic Variation in Women’s Voices Previously Shown to Affect Listener Physiology and Perception
title_full_unstemmed Fertility-Dependent Acoustic Variation in Women’s Voices Previously Shown to Affect Listener Physiology and Perception
title_sort fertility-dependent acoustic variation in women’s voices previously shown to affect listener physiology and perception
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Evolutionary Psychology
issn 1474-7049
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Previous research demonstrates that listeners perceive women’s voices as more attractive when recorded at high compared to low fertility phases of the menstrual cycle. This effect has been repeated with multiple voice recording samples, but one stimuli set has shown particularly robust replications. First collected by Pipitone and Gallup (2008), women were recorded counting from 1–10 on approximately the same day and time once a week for 4 weeks. Repeatedly, studies using these recordings have shown that naturally cycling women recorded at high fertility are rated as more attractive compared to voices of the same women at low fertility. Additionally, these stimuli have been shown to elicit autonomic nervous system arousal and precipitate a rise in testosterone levels among listeners. Although previous studies have examined the acoustic properties of voices across the menstrual cycle, they reach little consensus. The current study evaluates Pipitone and Gallup’s voice stimuli from an acoustic perspective, analyzing specific vocal characteristics of both naturally cycling women and women taking hormonal contraceptives. Results show that among naturally cycling women, variation in vocal amplitude (shimmer) was significantly lower in high fertility recordings compared to the women’s voices at low fertility. Harmonics-to-noise ratio and variation in voice pitch (jitter) also fluctuated systematically across voices sampled at different times during the menstrual cycle, though these effects were not statistically significant. It is possible that these acoustic changes could account for some of the replicated perceptual, hormonal, and physiological changes documented in prior literature using these voice stimuli.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704919843103
work_keys_str_mv AT melanielshoupknox fertilitydependentacousticvariationinwomensvoicespreviouslyshowntoaffectlistenerphysiologyandperception
AT grantmostrander fertilitydependentacousticvariationinwomensvoicespreviouslyshowntoaffectlistenerphysiologyandperception
AT gabrielleereimann fertilitydependentacousticvariationinwomensvoicespreviouslyshowntoaffectlistenerphysiologyandperception
AT rnathanpipitone fertilitydependentacousticvariationinwomensvoicespreviouslyshowntoaffectlistenerphysiologyandperception
_version_ 1724518474014785536