Study Fails to Link ILL Usage Patterns to Liaison Activities

A Review of: Leykam, Andrew. “Exploring Interlibrary Loan Usage Patterns and Liaison Activities: The Experience at a U.S. University.” Interlending & Document Supply 36.4 (2008): 218-24. Objective - To investigate Interlibrary Loan (ILL) usage patterns, and connect them to liaison activit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Scott Marsalis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Alberta 2009-06-01
Series:Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/5630
id doaj-f04409a8b37748a48d487ce297bcc4e9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f04409a8b37748a48d487ce297bcc4e92020-11-25T01:49:56ZengUniversity of AlbertaEvidence Based Library and Information Practice1715-720X2009-06-014210.18438/B8632DStudy Fails to Link ILL Usage Patterns to Liaison ActivitiesScott Marsalis0University of Minnesota - Twin CitiesA Review of: Leykam, Andrew. “Exploring Interlibrary Loan Usage Patterns and Liaison Activities: The Experience at a U.S. University.” Interlending & Document Supply 36.4 (2008): 218-24. Objective - To investigate Interlibrary Loan (ILL) usage patterns, and connect them to liaison activities beyond collection development. Design – Pattern analysis of ILL requests. Setting – Library of The College of Staten Island, a mid-size, public university with predominantly undergraduate enrolment. Subjects – 4,875 identifiable requests over a three-year period. Methods – A data set of requests for ILLs of monographs over a period of three years was acquired from OCLC resource sharing statistics. This data was manually reviewed to remove duplicate records of the same request, but not multiple requests for the same item. The data included requestor status, department, publication date and subject classification of requested items. Main Results – Differences in use across user statuses and departments were identified. Conclusion – Usage Patterns can accurately illustrate trends in the borrowing behaviour of patrons, and be used to inform liaison librarians about user needs.https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/5630Interlibrary LoanLiaisonAcademic Librarianship
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Scott Marsalis
spellingShingle Scott Marsalis
Study Fails to Link ILL Usage Patterns to Liaison Activities
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
Interlibrary Loan
Liaison
Academic Librarianship
author_facet Scott Marsalis
author_sort Scott Marsalis
title Study Fails to Link ILL Usage Patterns to Liaison Activities
title_short Study Fails to Link ILL Usage Patterns to Liaison Activities
title_full Study Fails to Link ILL Usage Patterns to Liaison Activities
title_fullStr Study Fails to Link ILL Usage Patterns to Liaison Activities
title_full_unstemmed Study Fails to Link ILL Usage Patterns to Liaison Activities
title_sort study fails to link ill usage patterns to liaison activities
publisher University of Alberta
series Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
issn 1715-720X
publishDate 2009-06-01
description A Review of: Leykam, Andrew. “Exploring Interlibrary Loan Usage Patterns and Liaison Activities: The Experience at a U.S. University.” Interlending & Document Supply 36.4 (2008): 218-24. Objective - To investigate Interlibrary Loan (ILL) usage patterns, and connect them to liaison activities beyond collection development. Design – Pattern analysis of ILL requests. Setting – Library of The College of Staten Island, a mid-size, public university with predominantly undergraduate enrolment. Subjects – 4,875 identifiable requests over a three-year period. Methods – A data set of requests for ILLs of monographs over a period of three years was acquired from OCLC resource sharing statistics. This data was manually reviewed to remove duplicate records of the same request, but not multiple requests for the same item. The data included requestor status, department, publication date and subject classification of requested items. Main Results – Differences in use across user statuses and departments were identified. Conclusion – Usage Patterns can accurately illustrate trends in the borrowing behaviour of patrons, and be used to inform liaison librarians about user needs.
topic Interlibrary Loan
Liaison
Academic Librarianship
url https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/5630
work_keys_str_mv AT scottmarsalis studyfailstolinkillusagepatternstoliaisonactivities
_version_ 1725003868255813632