On There Being Wide Reflective Equilibria: Why it is Important to Put it in the Plural

Wide reflective equilibrium [WRE] is a distinctive coherentist method of justification or explanation or both, depending on the domain or purpose for which it is deployed. I deploy it principally as a method of justification for accounts of morality and normative political and social theory. But it...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kai Nielsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2008-10-01
Series:Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice
Online Access:https://wyaj.uwindsor.ca/index.php/wyaj/article/view/4544
id doaj-f0336a1a0fa042d6853901a08f199ab2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f0336a1a0fa042d6853901a08f199ab22020-11-25T02:23:36ZengUniversity of WindsorWindsor Yearbook of Access to Justice2561-50172008-10-0126210.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4544On There Being Wide Reflective Equilibria: Why it is Important to Put it in the PluralKai Nielsen0Departments of Philosophy, University of Calgary/Concordia University Wide reflective equilibrium [WRE] is a distinctive coherentist method of justification or explanation or both, depending on the domain or purpose for which it is deployed. I deploy it principally as a method of justification for accounts of morality and normative political and social theory. But it is also used in many domains from the philosophy of mathematics and science to ethics and aesthetics. When deployed in domains as I deploy it for here, WRE starts with a cluster of societies’ specific considered judgments and uncontroversial empirical beliefs and theories and seeks to forge them into a coherent whole along with other considered judgments at all levels of generality. I use it here principally for a justification of political liberalism where it can and should be used for an internal justification, as John Rawls uses it, and as an external justification as Richard Rorty uses it. I use it for both. While these two modes of justification are distinct, they are compatible and importantly so. And for a more complete justification, both are required. https://wyaj.uwindsor.ca/index.php/wyaj/article/view/4544
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kai Nielsen
spellingShingle Kai Nielsen
On There Being Wide Reflective Equilibria: Why it is Important to Put it in the Plural
Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice
author_facet Kai Nielsen
author_sort Kai Nielsen
title On There Being Wide Reflective Equilibria: Why it is Important to Put it in the Plural
title_short On There Being Wide Reflective Equilibria: Why it is Important to Put it in the Plural
title_full On There Being Wide Reflective Equilibria: Why it is Important to Put it in the Plural
title_fullStr On There Being Wide Reflective Equilibria: Why it is Important to Put it in the Plural
title_full_unstemmed On There Being Wide Reflective Equilibria: Why it is Important to Put it in the Plural
title_sort on there being wide reflective equilibria: why it is important to put it in the plural
publisher University of Windsor
series Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice
issn 2561-5017
publishDate 2008-10-01
description Wide reflective equilibrium [WRE] is a distinctive coherentist method of justification or explanation or both, depending on the domain or purpose for which it is deployed. I deploy it principally as a method of justification for accounts of morality and normative political and social theory. But it is also used in many domains from the philosophy of mathematics and science to ethics and aesthetics. When deployed in domains as I deploy it for here, WRE starts with a cluster of societies’ specific considered judgments and uncontroversial empirical beliefs and theories and seeks to forge them into a coherent whole along with other considered judgments at all levels of generality. I use it here principally for a justification of political liberalism where it can and should be used for an internal justification, as John Rawls uses it, and as an external justification as Richard Rorty uses it. I use it for both. While these two modes of justification are distinct, they are compatible and importantly so. And for a more complete justification, both are required.
url https://wyaj.uwindsor.ca/index.php/wyaj/article/view/4544
work_keys_str_mv AT kainielsen ontherebeingwidereflectiveequilibriawhyitisimportanttoputitintheplural
_version_ 1724858551367630848