Evaluating DNA Extraction Methods for Community Profiling of Pig Hindgut Microbial Community.
Recovery of high quality PCR-amplifiable DNA has been the general minimal requirement for DNA extraction methods for bulk molecular analysis. However, modern high through-put community profiling technologies are more sensitive to representativeness and reproducibility of DNA extraction method. Here,...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4641665?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-f0227e954a094913b0ed322a18c68655 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f0227e954a094913b0ed322a18c686552020-11-25T01:53:20ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-011011e014272010.1371/journal.pone.0142720Evaluating DNA Extraction Methods for Community Profiling of Pig Hindgut Microbial Community.Yang LuPhilip HugenholtzDamien John BatstoneRecovery of high quality PCR-amplifiable DNA has been the general minimal requirement for DNA extraction methods for bulk molecular analysis. However, modern high through-put community profiling technologies are more sensitive to representativeness and reproducibility of DNA extraction method. Here, we assess the impact of three DNA extraction methods (with different levels of extraction harshness) for assessing hindgut microbiomes from pigs fed with different diets (with different physical properties). DNA extraction from each sample was performed in three technical replicates for each extraction method and sequenced by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Host was the primary driver of molecular sequencing outcomes, particularly on samples analysed by wheat based diets, but higher variability, with one failed extraction occurred on samples from a barley fed pig. Based on these results, an effective method will enable reproducible and quality outcomes on a range of samples, whereas an ineffective method will fail to generate extract, but host (rather than extraction method) remains the primary factor.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4641665?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yang Lu Philip Hugenholtz Damien John Batstone |
spellingShingle |
Yang Lu Philip Hugenholtz Damien John Batstone Evaluating DNA Extraction Methods for Community Profiling of Pig Hindgut Microbial Community. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Yang Lu Philip Hugenholtz Damien John Batstone |
author_sort |
Yang Lu |
title |
Evaluating DNA Extraction Methods for Community Profiling of Pig Hindgut Microbial Community. |
title_short |
Evaluating DNA Extraction Methods for Community Profiling of Pig Hindgut Microbial Community. |
title_full |
Evaluating DNA Extraction Methods for Community Profiling of Pig Hindgut Microbial Community. |
title_fullStr |
Evaluating DNA Extraction Methods for Community Profiling of Pig Hindgut Microbial Community. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluating DNA Extraction Methods for Community Profiling of Pig Hindgut Microbial Community. |
title_sort |
evaluating dna extraction methods for community profiling of pig hindgut microbial community. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
Recovery of high quality PCR-amplifiable DNA has been the general minimal requirement for DNA extraction methods for bulk molecular analysis. However, modern high through-put community profiling technologies are more sensitive to representativeness and reproducibility of DNA extraction method. Here, we assess the impact of three DNA extraction methods (with different levels of extraction harshness) for assessing hindgut microbiomes from pigs fed with different diets (with different physical properties). DNA extraction from each sample was performed in three technical replicates for each extraction method and sequenced by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Host was the primary driver of molecular sequencing outcomes, particularly on samples analysed by wheat based diets, but higher variability, with one failed extraction occurred on samples from a barley fed pig. Based on these results, an effective method will enable reproducible and quality outcomes on a range of samples, whereas an ineffective method will fail to generate extract, but host (rather than extraction method) remains the primary factor. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4641665?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yanglu evaluatingdnaextractionmethodsforcommunityprofilingofpighindgutmicrobialcommunity AT philiphugenholtz evaluatingdnaextractionmethodsforcommunityprofilingofpighindgutmicrobialcommunity AT damienjohnbatstone evaluatingdnaextractionmethodsforcommunityprofilingofpighindgutmicrobialcommunity |
_version_ |
1724991590842236928 |