Fluid intelligence and cognitive reflection in a strategic environment: evidence from dominance-solvable games

Dominance solvability is one of the most straightforward solution concepts in game theory. It is based on two principles: dominance (according to which players always use their dominant strategy) and iterated dominance (according to which players always act as if others apply the principle of domina...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nobuyuki HANAKI, Nicolas Jacquemet, Stephane Luchini, Adam Zylbersztejn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
CRT
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01188/full
id doaj-f0118f15a02c4f1bb8e50ae642151070
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f0118f15a02c4f1bb8e50ae6421510702020-11-24T22:00:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782016-08-01710.3389/fpsyg.2016.01188212596Fluid intelligence and cognitive reflection in a strategic environment: evidence from dominance-solvable gamesNobuyuki HANAKI0Nicolas Jacquemet1Stephane Luchini2Adam Zylbersztejn3University of NiceUniversity of Paris 1 Pantheon-SorbonneAix-Marseille School of EconomicsUniversity of Lyon, GATE CNRSDominance solvability is one of the most straightforward solution concepts in game theory. It is based on two principles: dominance (according to which players always use their dominant strategy) and iterated dominance (according to which players always act as if others apply the principle of dominance). However, existing experimental evidence questions the empirical accuracy of dominance solvability. In this study, we study the relationships between the key facets of dominance solvability and two cognitive skills, cognitive reflection and fluid intelligence. We provide evidence that the behaviors in accordance with dominance and one-step iterated dominance are both predicted by one's fluid intelligence rather than cognitive reflection. Individual cognitive skills, however, only explain a small fraction of the observed failure of dominance solvability. The accuracy of theoretical predictions on strategic decision making thus not only depends on individual cognitive characteristics, but also, perhaps more importantly, on the decision making environment itself.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01188/fullexperimentcognitive skillsCRTDominance solvabilityRaven's test
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nobuyuki HANAKI
Nicolas Jacquemet
Stephane Luchini
Adam Zylbersztejn
spellingShingle Nobuyuki HANAKI
Nicolas Jacquemet
Stephane Luchini
Adam Zylbersztejn
Fluid intelligence and cognitive reflection in a strategic environment: evidence from dominance-solvable games
Frontiers in Psychology
experiment
cognitive skills
CRT
Dominance solvability
Raven's test
author_facet Nobuyuki HANAKI
Nicolas Jacquemet
Stephane Luchini
Adam Zylbersztejn
author_sort Nobuyuki HANAKI
title Fluid intelligence and cognitive reflection in a strategic environment: evidence from dominance-solvable games
title_short Fluid intelligence and cognitive reflection in a strategic environment: evidence from dominance-solvable games
title_full Fluid intelligence and cognitive reflection in a strategic environment: evidence from dominance-solvable games
title_fullStr Fluid intelligence and cognitive reflection in a strategic environment: evidence from dominance-solvable games
title_full_unstemmed Fluid intelligence and cognitive reflection in a strategic environment: evidence from dominance-solvable games
title_sort fluid intelligence and cognitive reflection in a strategic environment: evidence from dominance-solvable games
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2016-08-01
description Dominance solvability is one of the most straightforward solution concepts in game theory. It is based on two principles: dominance (according to which players always use their dominant strategy) and iterated dominance (according to which players always act as if others apply the principle of dominance). However, existing experimental evidence questions the empirical accuracy of dominance solvability. In this study, we study the relationships between the key facets of dominance solvability and two cognitive skills, cognitive reflection and fluid intelligence. We provide evidence that the behaviors in accordance with dominance and one-step iterated dominance are both predicted by one's fluid intelligence rather than cognitive reflection. Individual cognitive skills, however, only explain a small fraction of the observed failure of dominance solvability. The accuracy of theoretical predictions on strategic decision making thus not only depends on individual cognitive characteristics, but also, perhaps more importantly, on the decision making environment itself.
topic experiment
cognitive skills
CRT
Dominance solvability
Raven's test
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01188/full
work_keys_str_mv AT nobuyukihanaki fluidintelligenceandcognitivereflectioninastrategicenvironmentevidencefromdominancesolvablegames
AT nicolasjacquemet fluidintelligenceandcognitivereflectioninastrategicenvironmentevidencefromdominancesolvablegames
AT stephaneluchini fluidintelligenceandcognitivereflectioninastrategicenvironmentevidencefromdominancesolvablegames
AT adamzylbersztejn fluidintelligenceandcognitivereflectioninastrategicenvironmentevidencefromdominancesolvablegames
_version_ 1725843605604532224