Fluid intelligence and cognitive reflection in a strategic environment: evidence from dominance-solvable games
Dominance solvability is one of the most straightforward solution concepts in game theory. It is based on two principles: dominance (according to which players always use their dominant strategy) and iterated dominance (according to which players always act as if others apply the principle of domina...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016-08-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01188/full |
id |
doaj-f0118f15a02c4f1bb8e50ae642151070 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f0118f15a02c4f1bb8e50ae6421510702020-11-24T22:00:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782016-08-01710.3389/fpsyg.2016.01188212596Fluid intelligence and cognitive reflection in a strategic environment: evidence from dominance-solvable gamesNobuyuki HANAKI0Nicolas Jacquemet1Stephane Luchini2Adam Zylbersztejn3University of NiceUniversity of Paris 1 Pantheon-SorbonneAix-Marseille School of EconomicsUniversity of Lyon, GATE CNRSDominance solvability is one of the most straightforward solution concepts in game theory. It is based on two principles: dominance (according to which players always use their dominant strategy) and iterated dominance (according to which players always act as if others apply the principle of dominance). However, existing experimental evidence questions the empirical accuracy of dominance solvability. In this study, we study the relationships between the key facets of dominance solvability and two cognitive skills, cognitive reflection and fluid intelligence. We provide evidence that the behaviors in accordance with dominance and one-step iterated dominance are both predicted by one's fluid intelligence rather than cognitive reflection. Individual cognitive skills, however, only explain a small fraction of the observed failure of dominance solvability. The accuracy of theoretical predictions on strategic decision making thus not only depends on individual cognitive characteristics, but also, perhaps more importantly, on the decision making environment itself.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01188/fullexperimentcognitive skillsCRTDominance solvabilityRaven's test |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nobuyuki HANAKI Nicolas Jacquemet Stephane Luchini Adam Zylbersztejn |
spellingShingle |
Nobuyuki HANAKI Nicolas Jacquemet Stephane Luchini Adam Zylbersztejn Fluid intelligence and cognitive reflection in a strategic environment: evidence from dominance-solvable games Frontiers in Psychology experiment cognitive skills CRT Dominance solvability Raven's test |
author_facet |
Nobuyuki HANAKI Nicolas Jacquemet Stephane Luchini Adam Zylbersztejn |
author_sort |
Nobuyuki HANAKI |
title |
Fluid intelligence and cognitive reflection in a strategic environment: evidence from dominance-solvable games |
title_short |
Fluid intelligence and cognitive reflection in a strategic environment: evidence from dominance-solvable games |
title_full |
Fluid intelligence and cognitive reflection in a strategic environment: evidence from dominance-solvable games |
title_fullStr |
Fluid intelligence and cognitive reflection in a strategic environment: evidence from dominance-solvable games |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fluid intelligence and cognitive reflection in a strategic environment: evidence from dominance-solvable games |
title_sort |
fluid intelligence and cognitive reflection in a strategic environment: evidence from dominance-solvable games |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2016-08-01 |
description |
Dominance solvability is one of the most straightforward solution concepts in game theory. It is based on two principles: dominance (according to which players always use their dominant strategy) and iterated dominance (according to which players always act as if others apply the principle of dominance). However, existing experimental evidence questions the empirical accuracy of dominance solvability. In this study, we study the relationships between the key facets of dominance solvability and two cognitive skills, cognitive reflection and fluid intelligence. We provide evidence that the behaviors in accordance with dominance and one-step iterated dominance are both predicted by one's fluid intelligence rather than cognitive reflection. Individual cognitive skills, however, only explain a small fraction of the observed failure of dominance solvability. The accuracy of theoretical predictions on strategic decision making thus not only depends on individual cognitive characteristics, but also, perhaps more importantly, on the decision making environment itself. |
topic |
experiment cognitive skills CRT Dominance solvability Raven's test |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01188/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nobuyukihanaki fluidintelligenceandcognitivereflectioninastrategicenvironmentevidencefromdominancesolvablegames AT nicolasjacquemet fluidintelligenceandcognitivereflectioninastrategicenvironmentevidencefromdominancesolvablegames AT stephaneluchini fluidintelligenceandcognitivereflectioninastrategicenvironmentevidencefromdominancesolvablegames AT adamzylbersztejn fluidintelligenceandcognitivereflectioninastrategicenvironmentevidencefromdominancesolvablegames |
_version_ |
1725843605604532224 |