Digital Disobedience and the Limits of Persuasion: Social Media Activism in Hong Kong’s 2014 Umbrella Movement

This article probes the catalytic features of social media in civic participation and mass civil disobedience in Hong Kong’s 2014 protests, and conceptualizes digital activism in terms of mobilization, organization, and persuasion. It makes use of in-depth interviews, in English, Mandarin, and Canto...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Colin Agur, Nicholas Frisch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-02-01
Series:Social Media + Society
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119827002
id doaj-f01043c588074e91beb22d422927959a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f01043c588074e91beb22d422927959a2020-11-25T03:08:35ZengSAGE PublishingSocial Media + Society2056-30512019-02-01510.1177/2056305119827002Digital Disobedience and the Limits of Persuasion: Social Media Activism in Hong Kong’s 2014 Umbrella MovementColin Agur0Nicholas Frisch1University of Minnesota, USAYale University, USAThis article probes the catalytic features of social media in civic participation and mass civil disobedience in Hong Kong’s 2014 protests, and conceptualizes digital activism in terms of mobilization, organization, and persuasion. It makes use of in-depth interviews, in English, Mandarin, and Cantonese, with 40 of the leading users of social media during the protests. These included, first and foremost, student activists, as well as opposition figures and journalists who reported on the protests. The article finds that the velocity and scale of social media have strengthened protesters’ ability to mobilize and organize, on the Internet and in the streets. Yet, these advantages have not carried over into persuasion of previously uncommitted individuals. Protesters encountered two main obstacles to persuasion via social media: the multitude of messages enabled by social media and the age segmentation of media. As a result, the movement’s social media efforts generated new attention and created digital space for activism, but did not persuade a durable majority of Hongkongers of the movement’s legitimacy. The Umbrella Movement may not have persuaded Hongkongers that their movement and tactics were valid or wise, but the existence of social media allowed protest leaders to document their motivations and conduct, and blunt less flattering narratives in legacy media.https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119827002
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Colin Agur
Nicholas Frisch
spellingShingle Colin Agur
Nicholas Frisch
Digital Disobedience and the Limits of Persuasion: Social Media Activism in Hong Kong’s 2014 Umbrella Movement
Social Media + Society
author_facet Colin Agur
Nicholas Frisch
author_sort Colin Agur
title Digital Disobedience and the Limits of Persuasion: Social Media Activism in Hong Kong’s 2014 Umbrella Movement
title_short Digital Disobedience and the Limits of Persuasion: Social Media Activism in Hong Kong’s 2014 Umbrella Movement
title_full Digital Disobedience and the Limits of Persuasion: Social Media Activism in Hong Kong’s 2014 Umbrella Movement
title_fullStr Digital Disobedience and the Limits of Persuasion: Social Media Activism in Hong Kong’s 2014 Umbrella Movement
title_full_unstemmed Digital Disobedience and the Limits of Persuasion: Social Media Activism in Hong Kong’s 2014 Umbrella Movement
title_sort digital disobedience and the limits of persuasion: social media activism in hong kong’s 2014 umbrella movement
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Social Media + Society
issn 2056-3051
publishDate 2019-02-01
description This article probes the catalytic features of social media in civic participation and mass civil disobedience in Hong Kong’s 2014 protests, and conceptualizes digital activism in terms of mobilization, organization, and persuasion. It makes use of in-depth interviews, in English, Mandarin, and Cantonese, with 40 of the leading users of social media during the protests. These included, first and foremost, student activists, as well as opposition figures and journalists who reported on the protests. The article finds that the velocity and scale of social media have strengthened protesters’ ability to mobilize and organize, on the Internet and in the streets. Yet, these advantages have not carried over into persuasion of previously uncommitted individuals. Protesters encountered two main obstacles to persuasion via social media: the multitude of messages enabled by social media and the age segmentation of media. As a result, the movement’s social media efforts generated new attention and created digital space for activism, but did not persuade a durable majority of Hongkongers of the movement’s legitimacy. The Umbrella Movement may not have persuaded Hongkongers that their movement and tactics were valid or wise, but the existence of social media allowed protest leaders to document their motivations and conduct, and blunt less flattering narratives in legacy media.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119827002
work_keys_str_mv AT colinagur digitaldisobedienceandthelimitsofpersuasionsocialmediaactivisminhongkongs2014umbrellamovement
AT nicholasfrisch digitaldisobedienceandthelimitsofpersuasionsocialmediaactivisminhongkongs2014umbrellamovement
_version_ 1724665561740214272