Comparison of turbulence models and CFD solution options for a plain pipe

Present paper is partly a declaration of state of a currently ongoing PhD work about turbulent flow in a thick walled pipe in order to analyze conjugate heat transfer. An ongoing effort on CFD investigation of this problem using cylindrical coordinates and dimensionless governing equations is identi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Canli Eyub, Ates Ali, Bilir Sefik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:EPJ Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818002013
id doaj-f0006e5773a04eb997cdc064095ac8c2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f0006e5773a04eb997cdc064095ac8c22021-08-02T08:20:16ZengEDP SciencesEPJ Web of Conferences2100-014X2018-01-011800201310.1051/epjconf/201818002013epjconf_efm2018_02013Comparison of turbulence models and CFD solution options for a plain pipeCanli EyubAtes AliBilir SefikPresent paper is partly a declaration of state of a currently ongoing PhD work about turbulent flow in a thick walled pipe in order to analyze conjugate heat transfer. An ongoing effort on CFD investigation of this problem using cylindrical coordinates and dimensionless governing equations is identified alongside a literature review. The mentioned PhD work will be conducted using an in-house developed code. However it needs preliminary evaluation by means of commercial codes available in the field. Accordingly ANSYS CFD was utilized in order to evaluate mesh structure needs and asses the turbulence models and solution options in terms of computational power versus difference signification. Present work contains a literature survey, an arrangement of governing equations of the PhD work, CFD essentials of the preliminary analysis and findings about the mesh structure and solution options. Mesh element number was changed between 5,000 and 320,000. k-ϵ, k-ω, Spalart-Allmaras and Viscous-Laminar models were compared. Reynolds number was changed between 1,000 and 50,000. As it may be expected due to the literature, k-ϵ yields more favorable results near the pipe axis and k-ωyields more convenient results near the wall. However k-ϵ is found sufficient to give turbulent structures for a conjugate heat transfer problem in a thick walled plain pipe.https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818002013
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Canli Eyub
Ates Ali
Bilir Sefik
spellingShingle Canli Eyub
Ates Ali
Bilir Sefik
Comparison of turbulence models and CFD solution options for a plain pipe
EPJ Web of Conferences
author_facet Canli Eyub
Ates Ali
Bilir Sefik
author_sort Canli Eyub
title Comparison of turbulence models and CFD solution options for a plain pipe
title_short Comparison of turbulence models and CFD solution options for a plain pipe
title_full Comparison of turbulence models and CFD solution options for a plain pipe
title_fullStr Comparison of turbulence models and CFD solution options for a plain pipe
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of turbulence models and CFD solution options for a plain pipe
title_sort comparison of turbulence models and cfd solution options for a plain pipe
publisher EDP Sciences
series EPJ Web of Conferences
issn 2100-014X
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Present paper is partly a declaration of state of a currently ongoing PhD work about turbulent flow in a thick walled pipe in order to analyze conjugate heat transfer. An ongoing effort on CFD investigation of this problem using cylindrical coordinates and dimensionless governing equations is identified alongside a literature review. The mentioned PhD work will be conducted using an in-house developed code. However it needs preliminary evaluation by means of commercial codes available in the field. Accordingly ANSYS CFD was utilized in order to evaluate mesh structure needs and asses the turbulence models and solution options in terms of computational power versus difference signification. Present work contains a literature survey, an arrangement of governing equations of the PhD work, CFD essentials of the preliminary analysis and findings about the mesh structure and solution options. Mesh element number was changed between 5,000 and 320,000. k-ϵ, k-ω, Spalart-Allmaras and Viscous-Laminar models were compared. Reynolds number was changed between 1,000 and 50,000. As it may be expected due to the literature, k-ϵ yields more favorable results near the pipe axis and k-ωyields more convenient results near the wall. However k-ϵ is found sufficient to give turbulent structures for a conjugate heat transfer problem in a thick walled plain pipe.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818002013
work_keys_str_mv AT canlieyub comparisonofturbulencemodelsandcfdsolutionoptionsforaplainpipe
AT atesali comparisonofturbulencemodelsandcfdsolutionoptionsforaplainpipe
AT bilirsefik comparisonofturbulencemodelsandcfdsolutionoptionsforaplainpipe
_version_ 1721238552246747136