Self-Efficacy, Planning, or a Combination of Both? A Longitudinal Experimental Study Comparing Effects of Three Interventions on Adolescents' Body Fat.

The superiority of an intervention combining two sets of theory-based behavior change techniques targeting planning and self-efficacy over an intervention targeting planning only or self-efficacy only has rarely been investigated.We compared the influence of self-efficacy, planning, and self-efficac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aleksandra Luszczynska, Martin S Hagger, Anna Banik, Karolina Horodyska, Nina Knoll, Urte Scholz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4943603?pdf=render
id doaj-efff558fe68a4d849abd512e479d5a1d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-efff558fe68a4d849abd512e479d5a1d2020-11-24T22:21:32ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01117e015912510.1371/journal.pone.0159125Self-Efficacy, Planning, or a Combination of Both? A Longitudinal Experimental Study Comparing Effects of Three Interventions on Adolescents' Body Fat.Aleksandra LuszczynskaMartin S HaggerAnna BanikKarolina HorodyskaNina KnollUrte ScholzThe superiority of an intervention combining two sets of theory-based behavior change techniques targeting planning and self-efficacy over an intervention targeting planning only or self-efficacy only has rarely been investigated.We compared the influence of self-efficacy, planning, and self-efficacy+planning interventions with an education-based control condition on adolescents' body fat, assuming mediating effects of respective social cognitive variables and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). The moderating role of the built environment was examined.Participants (N = 1217, aged 14-18 years) were randomly assigned to four conditions: planning (n = 270), self-efficacy (n = 311), self-efficacy+planning (n = 351), and control (n = 285). The measurement was conducted at baseline (T1), two-month follow-up (T2), and fourteen-month follow-up (T3). Interventions/control group procedures were delivered at T1 and T2. Percent of body fat tissue (measured at T1 and T3) was the main outcome. Social cognitive mediators (self-efficacy and planning) were assessed at T1 and T2. The behavioral mediator (MVPA) and the presence of built MVPA facilities (the moderator) were evaluated at T1 and T3.Similar small increases of body fat were found across the three intervention groups, but the increment of body fat was significantly larger in the control group. On average, differences between control and intervention groups translated to approximately 1% of body fat. Effects of the interventions on body fat were mediated by relevant social cognitive variables and MVPA. A lower increase of body fat was found among intervention group participants who had access to newly-built MVPA facilities.We found no superiority of an intervention targeting two social cognitive variables over the intervention targeting one cognition only.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4943603?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aleksandra Luszczynska
Martin S Hagger
Anna Banik
Karolina Horodyska
Nina Knoll
Urte Scholz
spellingShingle Aleksandra Luszczynska
Martin S Hagger
Anna Banik
Karolina Horodyska
Nina Knoll
Urte Scholz
Self-Efficacy, Planning, or a Combination of Both? A Longitudinal Experimental Study Comparing Effects of Three Interventions on Adolescents' Body Fat.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Aleksandra Luszczynska
Martin S Hagger
Anna Banik
Karolina Horodyska
Nina Knoll
Urte Scholz
author_sort Aleksandra Luszczynska
title Self-Efficacy, Planning, or a Combination of Both? A Longitudinal Experimental Study Comparing Effects of Three Interventions on Adolescents' Body Fat.
title_short Self-Efficacy, Planning, or a Combination of Both? A Longitudinal Experimental Study Comparing Effects of Three Interventions on Adolescents' Body Fat.
title_full Self-Efficacy, Planning, or a Combination of Both? A Longitudinal Experimental Study Comparing Effects of Three Interventions on Adolescents' Body Fat.
title_fullStr Self-Efficacy, Planning, or a Combination of Both? A Longitudinal Experimental Study Comparing Effects of Three Interventions on Adolescents' Body Fat.
title_full_unstemmed Self-Efficacy, Planning, or a Combination of Both? A Longitudinal Experimental Study Comparing Effects of Three Interventions on Adolescents' Body Fat.
title_sort self-efficacy, planning, or a combination of both? a longitudinal experimental study comparing effects of three interventions on adolescents' body fat.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description The superiority of an intervention combining two sets of theory-based behavior change techniques targeting planning and self-efficacy over an intervention targeting planning only or self-efficacy only has rarely been investigated.We compared the influence of self-efficacy, planning, and self-efficacy+planning interventions with an education-based control condition on adolescents' body fat, assuming mediating effects of respective social cognitive variables and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). The moderating role of the built environment was examined.Participants (N = 1217, aged 14-18 years) were randomly assigned to four conditions: planning (n = 270), self-efficacy (n = 311), self-efficacy+planning (n = 351), and control (n = 285). The measurement was conducted at baseline (T1), two-month follow-up (T2), and fourteen-month follow-up (T3). Interventions/control group procedures were delivered at T1 and T2. Percent of body fat tissue (measured at T1 and T3) was the main outcome. Social cognitive mediators (self-efficacy and planning) were assessed at T1 and T2. The behavioral mediator (MVPA) and the presence of built MVPA facilities (the moderator) were evaluated at T1 and T3.Similar small increases of body fat were found across the three intervention groups, but the increment of body fat was significantly larger in the control group. On average, differences between control and intervention groups translated to approximately 1% of body fat. Effects of the interventions on body fat were mediated by relevant social cognitive variables and MVPA. A lower increase of body fat was found among intervention group participants who had access to newly-built MVPA facilities.We found no superiority of an intervention targeting two social cognitive variables over the intervention targeting one cognition only.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4943603?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT aleksandraluszczynska selfefficacyplanningoracombinationofbothalongitudinalexperimentalstudycomparingeffectsofthreeinterventionsonadolescentsbodyfat
AT martinshagger selfefficacyplanningoracombinationofbothalongitudinalexperimentalstudycomparingeffectsofthreeinterventionsonadolescentsbodyfat
AT annabanik selfefficacyplanningoracombinationofbothalongitudinalexperimentalstudycomparingeffectsofthreeinterventionsonadolescentsbodyfat
AT karolinahorodyska selfefficacyplanningoracombinationofbothalongitudinalexperimentalstudycomparingeffectsofthreeinterventionsonadolescentsbodyfat
AT ninaknoll selfefficacyplanningoracombinationofbothalongitudinalexperimentalstudycomparingeffectsofthreeinterventionsonadolescentsbodyfat
AT urtescholz selfefficacyplanningoracombinationofbothalongitudinalexperimentalstudycomparingeffectsofthreeinterventionsonadolescentsbodyfat
_version_ 1725770668869419008