Using Magnetic Resonance for Predicting Femoral Strength: Added Value with respect to Bone Densitometry

Background and Purpose. To evaluate the added value of MRI with respect to peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for predicting femoral strength. Material and Methods. Bone mineral density (BMD) of eighteen femur specimens was assessed with pQC...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olivia Louis, Yves Fierens, Maria Strantza, Robert Luypaert, Johan de Mey, Erik Cattrysse
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/801518
id doaj-efe308fa11fb423b8cba7734c4a25278
record_format Article
spelling doaj-efe308fa11fb423b8cba7734c4a252782020-11-24T22:14:39ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412015-01-01201510.1155/2015/801518801518Using Magnetic Resonance for Predicting Femoral Strength: Added Value with respect to Bone DensitometryOlivia Louis0Yves Fierens1Maria Strantza2Robert Luypaert3Johan de Mey4Erik Cattrysse5Department of Radiology, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, BelgiumDepartment of Radiology, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, BelgiumDepartment of Mechanics of Materials and Constructions, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1040 Brussels, BelgiumDepartment of Radiology, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, BelgiumDepartment of Radiology, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, BelgiumDepartment of Experimental Anatomy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, BelgiumBackground and Purpose. To evaluate the added value of MRI with respect to peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for predicting femoral strength. Material and Methods. Bone mineral density (BMD) of eighteen femur specimens was assessed with pQCT, DXA, and MRI (using ultrashort echo times (UTE) and the MicroView software). Subsequently biomechanical testing was performed to assess failure load. Simple and multiple linear regression were used with failure load as the dependent variable. Results. Simple linear regression allowed a prediction of failure load with either pQCT, DXA, or MRI in an r2 range of 0.41–0.48. Multiple linear regression with pQCT, DXA, and MRI yielded the best prediction (r2=0.68). Conclusions. The accuracy of MRI, using UTE and MicroView software, to predict femoral strength compares well with that of pQCT or DXA. Furthermore, the inclusion of MRI in a multiple-regression model yields the best prediction.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/801518
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Olivia Louis
Yves Fierens
Maria Strantza
Robert Luypaert
Johan de Mey
Erik Cattrysse
spellingShingle Olivia Louis
Yves Fierens
Maria Strantza
Robert Luypaert
Johan de Mey
Erik Cattrysse
Using Magnetic Resonance for Predicting Femoral Strength: Added Value with respect to Bone Densitometry
BioMed Research International
author_facet Olivia Louis
Yves Fierens
Maria Strantza
Robert Luypaert
Johan de Mey
Erik Cattrysse
author_sort Olivia Louis
title Using Magnetic Resonance for Predicting Femoral Strength: Added Value with respect to Bone Densitometry
title_short Using Magnetic Resonance for Predicting Femoral Strength: Added Value with respect to Bone Densitometry
title_full Using Magnetic Resonance for Predicting Femoral Strength: Added Value with respect to Bone Densitometry
title_fullStr Using Magnetic Resonance for Predicting Femoral Strength: Added Value with respect to Bone Densitometry
title_full_unstemmed Using Magnetic Resonance for Predicting Femoral Strength: Added Value with respect to Bone Densitometry
title_sort using magnetic resonance for predicting femoral strength: added value with respect to bone densitometry
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Background and Purpose. To evaluate the added value of MRI with respect to peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for predicting femoral strength. Material and Methods. Bone mineral density (BMD) of eighteen femur specimens was assessed with pQCT, DXA, and MRI (using ultrashort echo times (UTE) and the MicroView software). Subsequently biomechanical testing was performed to assess failure load. Simple and multiple linear regression were used with failure load as the dependent variable. Results. Simple linear regression allowed a prediction of failure load with either pQCT, DXA, or MRI in an r2 range of 0.41–0.48. Multiple linear regression with pQCT, DXA, and MRI yielded the best prediction (r2=0.68). Conclusions. The accuracy of MRI, using UTE and MicroView software, to predict femoral strength compares well with that of pQCT or DXA. Furthermore, the inclusion of MRI in a multiple-regression model yields the best prediction.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/801518
work_keys_str_mv AT olivialouis usingmagneticresonanceforpredictingfemoralstrengthaddedvaluewithrespecttobonedensitometry
AT yvesfierens usingmagneticresonanceforpredictingfemoralstrengthaddedvaluewithrespecttobonedensitometry
AT mariastrantza usingmagneticresonanceforpredictingfemoralstrengthaddedvaluewithrespecttobonedensitometry
AT robertluypaert usingmagneticresonanceforpredictingfemoralstrengthaddedvaluewithrespecttobonedensitometry
AT johandemey usingmagneticresonanceforpredictingfemoralstrengthaddedvaluewithrespecttobonedensitometry
AT erikcattrysse usingmagneticresonanceforpredictingfemoralstrengthaddedvaluewithrespecttobonedensitometry
_version_ 1725797907243728896