From Geographical Indications to Rural Development: A Review of the Economic Effects of European Union Policy
One of the main functions of geographical indications (GIs) is to provide information and quality to consumers. This, in turn, can generate benefits for producers and stimulate rural development processes, as advocated by European Union (EU) legislation. The objective of the present study is to unde...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-10-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3745 |
id |
doaj-efe28b78c12d41a0b3769760d5e53590 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-efe28b78c12d41a0b3769760d5e535902020-11-24T21:47:41ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502018-10-011010374510.3390/su10103745su10103745From Geographical Indications to Rural Development: A Review of the Economic Effects of European Union PolicyLeonardo Cei0Edi Defrancesco1Gianluca Stefani2Land, Environment, Resources and Health (LERH) PhD Program—Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry (LEAF) Department, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, ItalyLand, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry (LEAF) Department, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, ItalyDISEI Department, University of Firenze, 50127 Firenze, ItalyOne of the main functions of geographical indications (GIs) is to provide information and quality to consumers. This, in turn, can generate benefits for producers and stimulate rural development processes, as advocated by European Union (EU) legislation. The objective of the present study is to understand if the theorized effects of GIs on local economic development are supported by empirical evidence. Using a systematic approach, we reviewed the literature on the topic and structured the results of the review adopting a supply chain framework. This allows us to better understand how the effects of GIs are distributed among the chain actors and finally arrive at the local territories where GI products originate. Evidence shows that GIs are actually able to generate value added, especially at the consumer and retailer levels, while the effects on the economic performance of producers are more heterogeneous and dependent on specific local conditions. The review also highlighted some drawbacks in the literature that make it difficult to draw robust conclusions about the actual impact of GI policy at the European level. Therefore, despite the GI tool actually showing good potential for improving local economic conditions, more structured and focused research is needed.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3745geographical indicationsliterature revieweconomic impactrural development |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Leonardo Cei Edi Defrancesco Gianluca Stefani |
spellingShingle |
Leonardo Cei Edi Defrancesco Gianluca Stefani From Geographical Indications to Rural Development: A Review of the Economic Effects of European Union Policy Sustainability geographical indications literature review economic impact rural development |
author_facet |
Leonardo Cei Edi Defrancesco Gianluca Stefani |
author_sort |
Leonardo Cei |
title |
From Geographical Indications to Rural Development: A Review of the Economic Effects of European Union Policy |
title_short |
From Geographical Indications to Rural Development: A Review of the Economic Effects of European Union Policy |
title_full |
From Geographical Indications to Rural Development: A Review of the Economic Effects of European Union Policy |
title_fullStr |
From Geographical Indications to Rural Development: A Review of the Economic Effects of European Union Policy |
title_full_unstemmed |
From Geographical Indications to Rural Development: A Review of the Economic Effects of European Union Policy |
title_sort |
from geographical indications to rural development: a review of the economic effects of european union policy |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2018-10-01 |
description |
One of the main functions of geographical indications (GIs) is to provide information and quality to consumers. This, in turn, can generate benefits for producers and stimulate rural development processes, as advocated by European Union (EU) legislation. The objective of the present study is to understand if the theorized effects of GIs on local economic development are supported by empirical evidence. Using a systematic approach, we reviewed the literature on the topic and structured the results of the review adopting a supply chain framework. This allows us to better understand how the effects of GIs are distributed among the chain actors and finally arrive at the local territories where GI products originate. Evidence shows that GIs are actually able to generate value added, especially at the consumer and retailer levels, while the effects on the economic performance of producers are more heterogeneous and dependent on specific local conditions. The review also highlighted some drawbacks in the literature that make it difficult to draw robust conclusions about the actual impact of GI policy at the European level. Therefore, despite the GI tool actually showing good potential for improving local economic conditions, more structured and focused research is needed. |
topic |
geographical indications literature review economic impact rural development |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3745 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT leonardocei fromgeographicalindicationstoruraldevelopmentareviewoftheeconomiceffectsofeuropeanunionpolicy AT edidefrancesco fromgeographicalindicationstoruraldevelopmentareviewoftheeconomiceffectsofeuropeanunionpolicy AT gianlucastefani fromgeographicalindicationstoruraldevelopmentareviewoftheeconomiceffectsofeuropeanunionpolicy |
_version_ |
1725896319295291392 |