Comparison of shear bond strength of two veneering ceramics to zirconia

Background : Chip-off fracture of veneering porcelain has been described as the most frequent reason for the failure of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of two commercial zirconia core ceramics to their corresponding venee...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mansour Rismanchian, Soufia Shafiei, Navid Askari, Niloufar Khodaeian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2012-01-01
Series:Dental Research Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2012;volume=9;issue=5;spage=628;epage=633;aulast=Rismanchian
id doaj-efc41e76617d4866ae0bf0ed0c44c57a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-efc41e76617d4866ae0bf0ed0c44c57a2020-11-25T00:14:06ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsDental Research Journal1735-33272008-02552012-01-019562863310.4103/1735-3327.104885Comparison of shear bond strength of two veneering ceramics to zirconiaMansour RismanchianSoufia ShafieiNavid AskariNiloufar KhodaeianBackground : Chip-off fracture of veneering porcelain has been described as the most frequent reason for the failure of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of two commercial zirconia core ceramics to their corresponding veneering ceramics. Materials and Methods : Zirconia disks with 7-mm diameter and 3-mm height were prepared (Cercon and Biodenta systems) and veneered with recommended layering ceramics (Cercon ceram and 2 in 1 ceramic, respectively) (n = 10). The disks were polished with diamond paste and airborne-particle abraded before layering. The specimens were mounted in a T-shaped metal holder using autopolymerized acrylic resin and stored in 37΀C distilled water for one week, after which they were subjected to thermal cycling. SBS of zirconia core to veneering ceramic was measured using a universal testing machine and failure modes were determined microscopically. Data were analyzed using t test (α < 0.05). Results : Mean (΁SD) SBS values were 27.19(΁3.43) and 28.22(΁4.08) MPa for Cercon and Biodenta systems, respectively, with no significant difference. Biodenta system showed more adhesive failure compared to more combined (adhesive and cohesive) failures in Cercon system. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study it can be concluded that SBS of Biodenta and Cercon specimens were nearly the same, but the fracture mode of these two systems were different. Since Biodenta fracture pattern was predominantly adhesive, it seems that maybe Biodenta porcelain was stronger than Cercon porcelain where as its adhesive bond was weaker.http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2012;volume=9;issue=5;spage=628;epage=633;aulast=RismanchianFailure modeshear bond strengthveneering ceramiczirconia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mansour Rismanchian
Soufia Shafiei
Navid Askari
Niloufar Khodaeian
spellingShingle Mansour Rismanchian
Soufia Shafiei
Navid Askari
Niloufar Khodaeian
Comparison of shear bond strength of two veneering ceramics to zirconia
Dental Research Journal
Failure mode
shear bond strength
veneering ceramic
zirconia
author_facet Mansour Rismanchian
Soufia Shafiei
Navid Askari
Niloufar Khodaeian
author_sort Mansour Rismanchian
title Comparison of shear bond strength of two veneering ceramics to zirconia
title_short Comparison of shear bond strength of two veneering ceramics to zirconia
title_full Comparison of shear bond strength of two veneering ceramics to zirconia
title_fullStr Comparison of shear bond strength of two veneering ceramics to zirconia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of shear bond strength of two veneering ceramics to zirconia
title_sort comparison of shear bond strength of two veneering ceramics to zirconia
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Dental Research Journal
issn 1735-3327
2008-0255
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Background : Chip-off fracture of veneering porcelain has been described as the most frequent reason for the failure of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of two commercial zirconia core ceramics to their corresponding veneering ceramics. Materials and Methods : Zirconia disks with 7-mm diameter and 3-mm height were prepared (Cercon and Biodenta systems) and veneered with recommended layering ceramics (Cercon ceram and 2 in 1 ceramic, respectively) (n = 10). The disks were polished with diamond paste and airborne-particle abraded before layering. The specimens were mounted in a T-shaped metal holder using autopolymerized acrylic resin and stored in 37΀C distilled water for one week, after which they were subjected to thermal cycling. SBS of zirconia core to veneering ceramic was measured using a universal testing machine and failure modes were determined microscopically. Data were analyzed using t test (α < 0.05). Results : Mean (΁SD) SBS values were 27.19(΁3.43) and 28.22(΁4.08) MPa for Cercon and Biodenta systems, respectively, with no significant difference. Biodenta system showed more adhesive failure compared to more combined (adhesive and cohesive) failures in Cercon system. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study it can be concluded that SBS of Biodenta and Cercon specimens were nearly the same, but the fracture mode of these two systems were different. Since Biodenta fracture pattern was predominantly adhesive, it seems that maybe Biodenta porcelain was stronger than Cercon porcelain where as its adhesive bond was weaker.
topic Failure mode
shear bond strength
veneering ceramic
zirconia
url http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2012;volume=9;issue=5;spage=628;epage=633;aulast=Rismanchian
work_keys_str_mv AT mansourrismanchian comparisonofshearbondstrengthoftwoveneeringceramicstozirconia
AT soufiashafiei comparisonofshearbondstrengthoftwoveneeringceramicstozirconia
AT navidaskari comparisonofshearbondstrengthoftwoveneeringceramicstozirconia
AT niloufarkhodaeian comparisonofshearbondstrengthoftwoveneeringceramicstozirconia
_version_ 1725391692172886016