Impact loading and locomotor-respiratory coordination significantly influence breathing dynamics in running humans.

Locomotor-respiratory coupling (LRC), phase-locking between breathing and stepping rhythms, occurs in many vertebrates. When quadrupedal mammals gallop, 1∶1 stride per breath coupling is necessitated by pronounced mechanical interactions between locomotion and ventilation. Humans show more flexibili...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Monica A Daley, Dennis M Bramble, David R Carrier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3741319?pdf=render
id doaj-efb5468c7ab3435fa7b389dbba142408
record_format Article
spelling doaj-efb5468c7ab3435fa7b389dbba1424082020-11-25T02:29:57ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0188e7075210.1371/journal.pone.0070752Impact loading and locomotor-respiratory coordination significantly influence breathing dynamics in running humans.Monica A DaleyDennis M BrambleDavid R CarrierLocomotor-respiratory coupling (LRC), phase-locking between breathing and stepping rhythms, occurs in many vertebrates. When quadrupedal mammals gallop, 1∶1 stride per breath coupling is necessitated by pronounced mechanical interactions between locomotion and ventilation. Humans show more flexibility in breathing patterns during locomotion, using LRC ratios of 2∶1, 2.5∶1, 3∶1, or 4∶1 and sometimes no coupling. Previous studies provide conflicting evidence on the mechanical significance of LRC in running humans. Some studies suggest LRC improves breathing efficiency, but others suggest LRC is mechanically insignificant because 'step-driven flows' (ventilatory flows attributable to step-induced forces) contribute a negligible fraction of tidal volume. Yet, although step-driven flows are brief, they cause large fluctuations in ventilatory flow. Here we test the hypothesis that running humans use LRC to minimize antagonistic effects of step-driven flows on breathing. We measured locomotor-ventilatory dynamics in 14 subjects running at a self-selected speed (2.6±0.1 ms(-1)) and compared breathing dynamics in their naturally 'preferred' and 'avoided' entrainment patterns. Step-driven flows occurred at 1-2X step frequency with peak magnitudes of 0.97±0.45 Ls(-1) (mean ±S.D). Step-driven flows varied depending on ventilatory state (high versus low lung volume), suggesting state-dependent changes in compliance and damping of thoraco-abdominal tissues. Subjects naturally preferred LRC patterns that minimized antagonistic interactions and aligned ventilatory transitions with assistive phases of the step. Ventilatory transitions initiated in 'preferred' phases within the step cycle occurred 2x faster than those in 'avoided' phases. We hypothesize that humans coordinate breathing and locomotion to minimize antagonistic loading of respiratory muscles, reduce work of breathing and minimize rate of fatigue. Future work could address the potential consequences of locomotor-ventilatory interactions for elite endurance athletes and individuals who are overweight or obese, populations in which respiratory muscle fatigue can be limiting.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3741319?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Monica A Daley
Dennis M Bramble
David R Carrier
spellingShingle Monica A Daley
Dennis M Bramble
David R Carrier
Impact loading and locomotor-respiratory coordination significantly influence breathing dynamics in running humans.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Monica A Daley
Dennis M Bramble
David R Carrier
author_sort Monica A Daley
title Impact loading and locomotor-respiratory coordination significantly influence breathing dynamics in running humans.
title_short Impact loading and locomotor-respiratory coordination significantly influence breathing dynamics in running humans.
title_full Impact loading and locomotor-respiratory coordination significantly influence breathing dynamics in running humans.
title_fullStr Impact loading and locomotor-respiratory coordination significantly influence breathing dynamics in running humans.
title_full_unstemmed Impact loading and locomotor-respiratory coordination significantly influence breathing dynamics in running humans.
title_sort impact loading and locomotor-respiratory coordination significantly influence breathing dynamics in running humans.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Locomotor-respiratory coupling (LRC), phase-locking between breathing and stepping rhythms, occurs in many vertebrates. When quadrupedal mammals gallop, 1∶1 stride per breath coupling is necessitated by pronounced mechanical interactions between locomotion and ventilation. Humans show more flexibility in breathing patterns during locomotion, using LRC ratios of 2∶1, 2.5∶1, 3∶1, or 4∶1 and sometimes no coupling. Previous studies provide conflicting evidence on the mechanical significance of LRC in running humans. Some studies suggest LRC improves breathing efficiency, but others suggest LRC is mechanically insignificant because 'step-driven flows' (ventilatory flows attributable to step-induced forces) contribute a negligible fraction of tidal volume. Yet, although step-driven flows are brief, they cause large fluctuations in ventilatory flow. Here we test the hypothesis that running humans use LRC to minimize antagonistic effects of step-driven flows on breathing. We measured locomotor-ventilatory dynamics in 14 subjects running at a self-selected speed (2.6±0.1 ms(-1)) and compared breathing dynamics in their naturally 'preferred' and 'avoided' entrainment patterns. Step-driven flows occurred at 1-2X step frequency with peak magnitudes of 0.97±0.45 Ls(-1) (mean ±S.D). Step-driven flows varied depending on ventilatory state (high versus low lung volume), suggesting state-dependent changes in compliance and damping of thoraco-abdominal tissues. Subjects naturally preferred LRC patterns that minimized antagonistic interactions and aligned ventilatory transitions with assistive phases of the step. Ventilatory transitions initiated in 'preferred' phases within the step cycle occurred 2x faster than those in 'avoided' phases. We hypothesize that humans coordinate breathing and locomotion to minimize antagonistic loading of respiratory muscles, reduce work of breathing and minimize rate of fatigue. Future work could address the potential consequences of locomotor-ventilatory interactions for elite endurance athletes and individuals who are overweight or obese, populations in which respiratory muscle fatigue can be limiting.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3741319?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT monicaadaley impactloadingandlocomotorrespiratorycoordinationsignificantlyinfluencebreathingdynamicsinrunninghumans
AT dennismbramble impactloadingandlocomotorrespiratorycoordinationsignificantlyinfluencebreathingdynamicsinrunninghumans
AT davidrcarrier impactloadingandlocomotorrespiratorycoordinationsignificantlyinfluencebreathingdynamicsinrunninghumans
_version_ 1724830694097551360