ASYMMETRY IN RISK AND RETURN FLUCTUATIONS AS A FACTOR DRIVING INTERNATIONAL PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS IN CRISIS PERIODS

The asymmetry between risk and return in developed, emerging and frontier market groups is discovered. Internal and structural asymmetry concepts are developed. A method of estimating structural asymmetry which comes down to calculating a standard deviation of marginal percentage returns in differen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pavlo Dziuba
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Consilium LLC 2017-01-01
Series:European Cooperation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://we.clmconsulting.pl/index.php/we/article/view/265
id doaj-efb49b026ce24874b07817a5bc94b54c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-efb49b026ce24874b07817a5bc94b54c2020-11-25T02:13:09ZengConsilium LLCEuropean Cooperation2449-73202449-87262017-01-011202334226ASYMMETRY IN RISK AND RETURN FLUCTUATIONS AS A FACTOR DRIVING INTERNATIONAL PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS IN CRISIS PERIODSPavlo Dziuba0Taras Shevchenko National University of KyivThe asymmetry between risk and return in developed, emerging and frontier market groups is discovered. Internal and structural asymmetry concepts are developed. A method of estimating structural asymmetry which comes down to calculating a standard deviation of marginal percentage returns in different market groups is developed. The higher the standard deviation the higher the structural asymmetry level is. Small standard deviations mean that the asymmetry level is relatively small. It is proved that structural asymmetry (symmetry) is a factor driving global portfolio flows in crisis periods as well as in periods of stability. Two patterns of structural asymmetry are identified. They are the crisis pattern and the stability pattern. Main features of these patterns are elaborated. The crisis pattern implies that in crisis periods relatively low levels of structural asymmetry bring about the increase in the share of developed markets in global portfolio liabilities while the share of emerging and frontier markets falls. The reverse is also true. The stability pattern implies that the share of developed markets decreases given relatively low structural asymmetry levels and vice versa. These patterns can be used to explain why in crisis periods the share of developed markets in global portfolio liabilities increases.http://we.clmconsulting.pl/index.php/we/article/view/265international portfolio investmentsglobal portfolio liabilitiesdeveloped marketsemerging marketsfrontier marketsrisk and return asymmetryinternational investment positionpattern of risk and return structural asymmetry
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pavlo Dziuba
spellingShingle Pavlo Dziuba
ASYMMETRY IN RISK AND RETURN FLUCTUATIONS AS A FACTOR DRIVING INTERNATIONAL PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS IN CRISIS PERIODS
European Cooperation
international portfolio investments
global portfolio liabilities
developed markets
emerging markets
frontier markets
risk and return asymmetry
international investment position
pattern of risk and return structural asymmetry
author_facet Pavlo Dziuba
author_sort Pavlo Dziuba
title ASYMMETRY IN RISK AND RETURN FLUCTUATIONS AS A FACTOR DRIVING INTERNATIONAL PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS IN CRISIS PERIODS
title_short ASYMMETRY IN RISK AND RETURN FLUCTUATIONS AS A FACTOR DRIVING INTERNATIONAL PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS IN CRISIS PERIODS
title_full ASYMMETRY IN RISK AND RETURN FLUCTUATIONS AS A FACTOR DRIVING INTERNATIONAL PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS IN CRISIS PERIODS
title_fullStr ASYMMETRY IN RISK AND RETURN FLUCTUATIONS AS A FACTOR DRIVING INTERNATIONAL PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS IN CRISIS PERIODS
title_full_unstemmed ASYMMETRY IN RISK AND RETURN FLUCTUATIONS AS A FACTOR DRIVING INTERNATIONAL PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS IN CRISIS PERIODS
title_sort asymmetry in risk and return fluctuations as a factor driving international portfolio investments in crisis periods
publisher Consilium LLC
series European Cooperation
issn 2449-7320
2449-8726
publishDate 2017-01-01
description The asymmetry between risk and return in developed, emerging and frontier market groups is discovered. Internal and structural asymmetry concepts are developed. A method of estimating structural asymmetry which comes down to calculating a standard deviation of marginal percentage returns in different market groups is developed. The higher the standard deviation the higher the structural asymmetry level is. Small standard deviations mean that the asymmetry level is relatively small. It is proved that structural asymmetry (symmetry) is a factor driving global portfolio flows in crisis periods as well as in periods of stability. Two patterns of structural asymmetry are identified. They are the crisis pattern and the stability pattern. Main features of these patterns are elaborated. The crisis pattern implies that in crisis periods relatively low levels of structural asymmetry bring about the increase in the share of developed markets in global portfolio liabilities while the share of emerging and frontier markets falls. The reverse is also true. The stability pattern implies that the share of developed markets decreases given relatively low structural asymmetry levels and vice versa. These patterns can be used to explain why in crisis periods the share of developed markets in global portfolio liabilities increases.
topic international portfolio investments
global portfolio liabilities
developed markets
emerging markets
frontier markets
risk and return asymmetry
international investment position
pattern of risk and return structural asymmetry
url http://we.clmconsulting.pl/index.php/we/article/view/265
work_keys_str_mv AT pavlodziuba asymmetryinriskandreturnfluctuationsasafactordrivinginternationalportfolioinvestmentsincrisisperiods
_version_ 1724906012309192704