Can Art Make a Difference? Visual and Performative Arts on the Subject of Indonesian Mass Killings of 1965–66

This paper considers the impact of various activities of artistic nature in public debate and collective memory of the genocide in Indonesia in the years 1965-1966, as well as the public reception of these event, with a particular focus on Joshua Oppenheimer’s documentary „The Act of Killing” (2012)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michał Bielecki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 2018-01-01
Series:IKAT: The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/ikat/article/view/32362
id doaj-efaadf1f08524f34a7d5ff12fd451e40
record_format Article
spelling doaj-efaadf1f08524f34a7d5ff12fd451e402020-11-25T02:55:44ZengUniversitas Gadjah Mada, YogyakartaIKAT: The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies2580-65802018-01-011222724110.22146/ikat.v1i2.3236219800Can Art Make a Difference? Visual and Performative Arts on the Subject of Indonesian Mass Killings of 1965–66Michał Bielecki0Graduate School for Social Research, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland and Center for Southeast Asian Social Studies, Universitas Gadjah MadaThis paper considers the impact of various activities of artistic nature in public debate and collective memory of the genocide in Indonesia in the years 1965-1966, as well as the public reception of these event, with a particular focus on Joshua Oppenheimer’s documentary „The Act of Killing” (2012). As a result of systematic extermination of PKI members and sympathizers, between 500 thousand and 2 million people were killed. These murders are often considered an ‘unspoken’ or ‘forgotten’ crime. In Suharto’s Indonesia, questioning the official version of events was prohibited. In 1998, General Suharto resigned from office and the state begun a slow drift towards democracy. The issue of the traumatic past, however, remains a very uncomfortable one. The crime of such scale cannot be easily forced into oblivion. The pressure faced by authorities in today's Indonesia was caused partly, if not mainly, by mnemonic actors of an artistic nature, by both Indonesian and foreign artists interested in this matter. By applying content analysis, the proposed paper discusses varied artistic activities addressing the mass violence and their influence on the public discussion and the collective memory of that event. The analysis of media reports, interviews with artists, fictional and documentary films was carried out by the author. The study shows how art contributes to the process of dealing with Indonesia’s past.https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/ikat/article/view/32362indonesia, film, pki, memory, visual and performative art, 1965
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michał Bielecki
spellingShingle Michał Bielecki
Can Art Make a Difference? Visual and Performative Arts on the Subject of Indonesian Mass Killings of 1965–66
IKAT: The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies
indonesia, film, pki, memory, visual and performative art, 1965
author_facet Michał Bielecki
author_sort Michał Bielecki
title Can Art Make a Difference? Visual and Performative Arts on the Subject of Indonesian Mass Killings of 1965–66
title_short Can Art Make a Difference? Visual and Performative Arts on the Subject of Indonesian Mass Killings of 1965–66
title_full Can Art Make a Difference? Visual and Performative Arts on the Subject of Indonesian Mass Killings of 1965–66
title_fullStr Can Art Make a Difference? Visual and Performative Arts on the Subject of Indonesian Mass Killings of 1965–66
title_full_unstemmed Can Art Make a Difference? Visual and Performative Arts on the Subject of Indonesian Mass Killings of 1965–66
title_sort can art make a difference? visual and performative arts on the subject of indonesian mass killings of 1965–66
publisher Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
series IKAT: The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies
issn 2580-6580
publishDate 2018-01-01
description This paper considers the impact of various activities of artistic nature in public debate and collective memory of the genocide in Indonesia in the years 1965-1966, as well as the public reception of these event, with a particular focus on Joshua Oppenheimer’s documentary „The Act of Killing” (2012). As a result of systematic extermination of PKI members and sympathizers, between 500 thousand and 2 million people were killed. These murders are often considered an ‘unspoken’ or ‘forgotten’ crime. In Suharto’s Indonesia, questioning the official version of events was prohibited. In 1998, General Suharto resigned from office and the state begun a slow drift towards democracy. The issue of the traumatic past, however, remains a very uncomfortable one. The crime of such scale cannot be easily forced into oblivion. The pressure faced by authorities in today's Indonesia was caused partly, if not mainly, by mnemonic actors of an artistic nature, by both Indonesian and foreign artists interested in this matter. By applying content analysis, the proposed paper discusses varied artistic activities addressing the mass violence and their influence on the public discussion and the collective memory of that event. The analysis of media reports, interviews with artists, fictional and documentary films was carried out by the author. The study shows how art contributes to the process of dealing with Indonesia’s past.
topic indonesia, film, pki, memory, visual and performative art, 1965
url https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/ikat/article/view/32362
work_keys_str_mv AT michałbielecki canartmakeadifferencevisualandperformativeartsonthesubjectofindonesianmasskillingsof196566
_version_ 1724716558648868864