Can Art Make a Difference? Visual and Performative Arts on the Subject of Indonesian Mass Killings of 1965–66
This paper considers the impact of various activities of artistic nature in public debate and collective memory of the genocide in Indonesia in the years 1965-1966, as well as the public reception of these event, with a particular focus on Joshua Oppenheimer’s documentary „The Act of Killing” (2012)...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
2018-01-01
|
Series: | IKAT: The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/ikat/article/view/32362 |
id |
doaj-efaadf1f08524f34a7d5ff12fd451e40 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-efaadf1f08524f34a7d5ff12fd451e402020-11-25T02:55:44ZengUniversitas Gadjah Mada, YogyakartaIKAT: The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies2580-65802018-01-011222724110.22146/ikat.v1i2.3236219800Can Art Make a Difference? Visual and Performative Arts on the Subject of Indonesian Mass Killings of 1965–66Michał Bielecki0Graduate School for Social Research, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland and Center for Southeast Asian Social Studies, Universitas Gadjah MadaThis paper considers the impact of various activities of artistic nature in public debate and collective memory of the genocide in Indonesia in the years 1965-1966, as well as the public reception of these event, with a particular focus on Joshua Oppenheimer’s documentary „The Act of Killing” (2012). As a result of systematic extermination of PKI members and sympathizers, between 500 thousand and 2 million people were killed. These murders are often considered an ‘unspoken’ or ‘forgotten’ crime. In Suharto’s Indonesia, questioning the official version of events was prohibited. In 1998, General Suharto resigned from office and the state begun a slow drift towards democracy. The issue of the traumatic past, however, remains a very uncomfortable one. The crime of such scale cannot be easily forced into oblivion. The pressure faced by authorities in today's Indonesia was caused partly, if not mainly, by mnemonic actors of an artistic nature, by both Indonesian and foreign artists interested in this matter. By applying content analysis, the proposed paper discusses varied artistic activities addressing the mass violence and their influence on the public discussion and the collective memory of that event. The analysis of media reports, interviews with artists, fictional and documentary films was carried out by the author. The study shows how art contributes to the process of dealing with Indonesia’s past.https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/ikat/article/view/32362indonesia, film, pki, memory, visual and performative art, 1965 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Michał Bielecki |
spellingShingle |
Michał Bielecki Can Art Make a Difference? Visual and Performative Arts on the Subject of Indonesian Mass Killings of 1965–66 IKAT: The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies indonesia, film, pki, memory, visual and performative art, 1965 |
author_facet |
Michał Bielecki |
author_sort |
Michał Bielecki |
title |
Can Art Make a Difference? Visual and Performative Arts on the Subject of Indonesian Mass Killings of 1965–66 |
title_short |
Can Art Make a Difference? Visual and Performative Arts on the Subject of Indonesian Mass Killings of 1965–66 |
title_full |
Can Art Make a Difference? Visual and Performative Arts on the Subject of Indonesian Mass Killings of 1965–66 |
title_fullStr |
Can Art Make a Difference? Visual and Performative Arts on the Subject of Indonesian Mass Killings of 1965–66 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Can Art Make a Difference? Visual and Performative Arts on the Subject of Indonesian Mass Killings of 1965–66 |
title_sort |
can art make a difference? visual and performative arts on the subject of indonesian mass killings of 1965–66 |
publisher |
Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta |
series |
IKAT: The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies |
issn |
2580-6580 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
This paper considers the impact of various activities of artistic nature in public debate and collective memory of the genocide in Indonesia in the years 1965-1966, as well as the public reception of these event, with a particular focus on Joshua Oppenheimer’s documentary „The Act of Killing” (2012). As a result of systematic extermination of PKI members and sympathizers, between 500 thousand and 2 million people were killed. These murders are often considered an ‘unspoken’ or ‘forgotten’ crime. In Suharto’s Indonesia, questioning the official version of events was prohibited. In 1998, General Suharto resigned from office and the state begun a slow drift towards democracy. The issue of the traumatic past, however, remains a very uncomfortable one. The crime of such scale cannot be easily forced into oblivion. The pressure faced by authorities in today's Indonesia was caused partly, if not mainly, by mnemonic actors of an artistic nature, by both Indonesian and foreign artists interested in this matter. By applying content analysis, the proposed paper discusses varied artistic activities addressing the mass violence and their influence on the public discussion and the collective memory of that event. The analysis of media reports, interviews with artists, fictional and documentary films was carried out by the author. The study shows how art contributes to the process of dealing with Indonesia’s past. |
topic |
indonesia, film, pki, memory, visual and performative art, 1965 |
url |
https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/ikat/article/view/32362 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michałbielecki canartmakeadifferencevisualandperformativeartsonthesubjectofindonesianmasskillingsof196566 |
_version_ |
1724716558648868864 |