Comparison of Four Ground-Level PM2.5 Estimation Models Using PARASOL Aerosol Optical Depth Data from China

Satellite remote sensing is of considerable importance for estimating ground-level PM2.5 concentrations to support environmental agencies monitoring air quality. However, most current studies have focused mainly on the application of MODIS aerosol optical depth (AOD) to predict PM2.5 concentrations,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hong Guo, Tianhai Cheng, Xingfa Gu, Hao Chen, Ying Wang, Fengjie Zheng, Kunshen Xiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-01-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/2/180
id doaj-efa8a5910a9049b997b949e6081f6523
record_format Article
spelling doaj-efa8a5910a9049b997b949e6081f65232020-11-24T21:08:04ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1660-46012016-01-0113218010.3390/ijerph13020180ijerph13020180Comparison of Four Ground-Level PM2.5 Estimation Models Using PARASOL Aerosol Optical Depth Data from ChinaHong Guo0Tianhai Cheng1Xingfa Gu2Hao Chen3Ying Wang4Fengjie Zheng5Kunshen Xiang6State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaSatellite remote sensing is of considerable importance for estimating ground-level PM2.5 concentrations to support environmental agencies monitoring air quality. However, most current studies have focused mainly on the application of MODIS aerosol optical depth (AOD) to predict PM2.5 concentrations, while PARASOL AOD, which is sensitive to fine-mode aerosols over land surfaces, has received little attention. In this study, we compared a linear regression model, a quadratic regression model, a power regression model and a logarithmic regression model, which were developed using PARASOL level 2 AOD collected in China from 18 January 2013 to 10 October 2013. We obtained R (correlation coefficient) values of 0.64, 0.63, 0.62, and 0.57 for the four models when they were cross validated with the observed values. Furthermore, after all the data were classified into six levels according to the Air Quality Index (AQI), a low level of statistical significance between the four empirical models was found when the ground-level PM2.5 concentrations were greater than 75 μg/m3. The maximum R value was 0.44 (for the logarithmic regression model and the power model), and the minimum R value was 0.28 (for the logarithmic regression model and the power model) when the PM2.5 concentrations were less than 75 μg/m3. We also discussed uncertainty sources and possible improvements.http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/2/180PM2.5 concentrationsfine-mode aerosolpolarized remote sensingair quality monitoringempirical models
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hong Guo
Tianhai Cheng
Xingfa Gu
Hao Chen
Ying Wang
Fengjie Zheng
Kunshen Xiang
spellingShingle Hong Guo
Tianhai Cheng
Xingfa Gu
Hao Chen
Ying Wang
Fengjie Zheng
Kunshen Xiang
Comparison of Four Ground-Level PM2.5 Estimation Models Using PARASOL Aerosol Optical Depth Data from China
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
PM2.5 concentrations
fine-mode aerosol
polarized remote sensing
air quality monitoring
empirical models
author_facet Hong Guo
Tianhai Cheng
Xingfa Gu
Hao Chen
Ying Wang
Fengjie Zheng
Kunshen Xiang
author_sort Hong Guo
title Comparison of Four Ground-Level PM2.5 Estimation Models Using PARASOL Aerosol Optical Depth Data from China
title_short Comparison of Four Ground-Level PM2.5 Estimation Models Using PARASOL Aerosol Optical Depth Data from China
title_full Comparison of Four Ground-Level PM2.5 Estimation Models Using PARASOL Aerosol Optical Depth Data from China
title_fullStr Comparison of Four Ground-Level PM2.5 Estimation Models Using PARASOL Aerosol Optical Depth Data from China
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Four Ground-Level PM2.5 Estimation Models Using PARASOL Aerosol Optical Depth Data from China
title_sort comparison of four ground-level pm2.5 estimation models using parasol aerosol optical depth data from china
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1660-4601
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Satellite remote sensing is of considerable importance for estimating ground-level PM2.5 concentrations to support environmental agencies monitoring air quality. However, most current studies have focused mainly on the application of MODIS aerosol optical depth (AOD) to predict PM2.5 concentrations, while PARASOL AOD, which is sensitive to fine-mode aerosols over land surfaces, has received little attention. In this study, we compared a linear regression model, a quadratic regression model, a power regression model and a logarithmic regression model, which were developed using PARASOL level 2 AOD collected in China from 18 January 2013 to 10 October 2013. We obtained R (correlation coefficient) values of 0.64, 0.63, 0.62, and 0.57 for the four models when they were cross validated with the observed values. Furthermore, after all the data were classified into six levels according to the Air Quality Index (AQI), a low level of statistical significance between the four empirical models was found when the ground-level PM2.5 concentrations were greater than 75 μg/m3. The maximum R value was 0.44 (for the logarithmic regression model and the power model), and the minimum R value was 0.28 (for the logarithmic regression model and the power model) when the PM2.5 concentrations were less than 75 μg/m3. We also discussed uncertainty sources and possible improvements.
topic PM2.5 concentrations
fine-mode aerosol
polarized remote sensing
air quality monitoring
empirical models
url http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/2/180
work_keys_str_mv AT hongguo comparisonoffourgroundlevelpm25estimationmodelsusingparasolaerosolopticaldepthdatafromchina
AT tianhaicheng comparisonoffourgroundlevelpm25estimationmodelsusingparasolaerosolopticaldepthdatafromchina
AT xingfagu comparisonoffourgroundlevelpm25estimationmodelsusingparasolaerosolopticaldepthdatafromchina
AT haochen comparisonoffourgroundlevelpm25estimationmodelsusingparasolaerosolopticaldepthdatafromchina
AT yingwang comparisonoffourgroundlevelpm25estimationmodelsusingparasolaerosolopticaldepthdatafromchina
AT fengjiezheng comparisonoffourgroundlevelpm25estimationmodelsusingparasolaerosolopticaldepthdatafromchina
AT kunshenxiang comparisonoffourgroundlevelpm25estimationmodelsusingparasolaerosolopticaldepthdatafromchina
_version_ 1716760972395282432