Comparison of Four Ground-Level PM2.5 Estimation Models Using PARASOL Aerosol Optical Depth Data from China
Satellite remote sensing is of considerable importance for estimating ground-level PM2.5 concentrations to support environmental agencies monitoring air quality. However, most current studies have focused mainly on the application of MODIS aerosol optical depth (AOD) to predict PM2.5 concentrations,...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2016-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/2/180 |
id |
doaj-efa8a5910a9049b997b949e6081f6523 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-efa8a5910a9049b997b949e6081f65232020-11-24T21:08:04ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1660-46012016-01-0113218010.3390/ijerph13020180ijerph13020180Comparison of Four Ground-Level PM2.5 Estimation Models Using PARASOL Aerosol Optical Depth Data from ChinaHong Guo0Tianhai Cheng1Xingfa Gu2Hao Chen3Ying Wang4Fengjie Zheng5Kunshen Xiang6State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaSatellite remote sensing is of considerable importance for estimating ground-level PM2.5 concentrations to support environmental agencies monitoring air quality. However, most current studies have focused mainly on the application of MODIS aerosol optical depth (AOD) to predict PM2.5 concentrations, while PARASOL AOD, which is sensitive to fine-mode aerosols over land surfaces, has received little attention. In this study, we compared a linear regression model, a quadratic regression model, a power regression model and a logarithmic regression model, which were developed using PARASOL level 2 AOD collected in China from 18 January 2013 to 10 October 2013. We obtained R (correlation coefficient) values of 0.64, 0.63, 0.62, and 0.57 for the four models when they were cross validated with the observed values. Furthermore, after all the data were classified into six levels according to the Air Quality Index (AQI), a low level of statistical significance between the four empirical models was found when the ground-level PM2.5 concentrations were greater than 75 μg/m3. The maximum R value was 0.44 (for the logarithmic regression model and the power model), and the minimum R value was 0.28 (for the logarithmic regression model and the power model) when the PM2.5 concentrations were less than 75 μg/m3. We also discussed uncertainty sources and possible improvements.http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/2/180PM2.5 concentrationsfine-mode aerosolpolarized remote sensingair quality monitoringempirical models |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hong Guo Tianhai Cheng Xingfa Gu Hao Chen Ying Wang Fengjie Zheng Kunshen Xiang |
spellingShingle |
Hong Guo Tianhai Cheng Xingfa Gu Hao Chen Ying Wang Fengjie Zheng Kunshen Xiang Comparison of Four Ground-Level PM2.5 Estimation Models Using PARASOL Aerosol Optical Depth Data from China International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health PM2.5 concentrations fine-mode aerosol polarized remote sensing air quality monitoring empirical models |
author_facet |
Hong Guo Tianhai Cheng Xingfa Gu Hao Chen Ying Wang Fengjie Zheng Kunshen Xiang |
author_sort |
Hong Guo |
title |
Comparison of Four Ground-Level PM2.5 Estimation Models Using PARASOL Aerosol Optical Depth Data from China |
title_short |
Comparison of Four Ground-Level PM2.5 Estimation Models Using PARASOL Aerosol Optical Depth Data from China |
title_full |
Comparison of Four Ground-Level PM2.5 Estimation Models Using PARASOL Aerosol Optical Depth Data from China |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of Four Ground-Level PM2.5 Estimation Models Using PARASOL Aerosol Optical Depth Data from China |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of Four Ground-Level PM2.5 Estimation Models Using PARASOL Aerosol Optical Depth Data from China |
title_sort |
comparison of four ground-level pm2.5 estimation models using parasol aerosol optical depth data from china |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
issn |
1660-4601 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
Satellite remote sensing is of considerable importance for estimating ground-level PM2.5 concentrations to support environmental agencies monitoring air quality. However, most current studies have focused mainly on the application of MODIS aerosol optical depth (AOD) to predict PM2.5 concentrations, while PARASOL AOD, which is sensitive to fine-mode aerosols over land surfaces, has received little attention. In this study, we compared a linear regression model, a quadratic regression model, a power regression model and a logarithmic regression model, which were developed using PARASOL level 2 AOD collected in China from 18 January 2013 to 10 October 2013. We obtained R (correlation coefficient) values of 0.64, 0.63, 0.62, and 0.57 for the four models when they were cross validated with the observed values. Furthermore, after all the data were classified into six levels according to the Air Quality Index (AQI), a low level of statistical significance between the four empirical models was found when the ground-level PM2.5 concentrations were greater than 75 μg/m3. The maximum R value was 0.44 (for the logarithmic regression model and the power model), and the minimum R value was 0.28 (for the logarithmic regression model and the power model) when the PM2.5 concentrations were less than 75 μg/m3. We also discussed uncertainty sources and possible improvements. |
topic |
PM2.5 concentrations fine-mode aerosol polarized remote sensing air quality monitoring empirical models |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/2/180 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hongguo comparisonoffourgroundlevelpm25estimationmodelsusingparasolaerosolopticaldepthdatafromchina AT tianhaicheng comparisonoffourgroundlevelpm25estimationmodelsusingparasolaerosolopticaldepthdatafromchina AT xingfagu comparisonoffourgroundlevelpm25estimationmodelsusingparasolaerosolopticaldepthdatafromchina AT haochen comparisonoffourgroundlevelpm25estimationmodelsusingparasolaerosolopticaldepthdatafromchina AT yingwang comparisonoffourgroundlevelpm25estimationmodelsusingparasolaerosolopticaldepthdatafromchina AT fengjiezheng comparisonoffourgroundlevelpm25estimationmodelsusingparasolaerosolopticaldepthdatafromchina AT kunshenxiang comparisonoffourgroundlevelpm25estimationmodelsusingparasolaerosolopticaldepthdatafromchina |
_version_ |
1716760972395282432 |