Efficient Multicriteria Protein Structure Comparison on Modern Processor Architectures
Fast increasing computational demand for all-to-all protein structures comparison (PSC) is a result of three confounding factors: rapidly expanding structural proteomics databases, high computational complexity of pairwise protein comparison algorithms, and the trend in the domain towards using mult...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2015-01-01
|
Series: | BioMed Research International |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/563674 |
id |
doaj-ef8d1fbf1885404cbc07307967eff9fe |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ef8d1fbf1885404cbc07307967eff9fe2020-11-24T21:09:29ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412015-01-01201510.1155/2015/563674563674Efficient Multicriteria Protein Structure Comparison on Modern Processor ArchitecturesAnuj Sharma0Elias S. Manolakos1Department of Informatics and Telecommunications, University of Athens, Athens, GreeceDepartment of Informatics and Telecommunications, University of Athens, Athens, GreeceFast increasing computational demand for all-to-all protein structures comparison (PSC) is a result of three confounding factors: rapidly expanding structural proteomics databases, high computational complexity of pairwise protein comparison algorithms, and the trend in the domain towards using multiple criteria for protein structures comparison (MCPSC) and combining results. We have developed a software framework that exploits many-core and multicore CPUs to implement efficient parallel MCPSC in modern processors based on three popular PSC methods, namely, TMalign, CE, and USM. We evaluate and compare the performance and efficiency of the two parallel MCPSC implementations using Intel’s experimental many-core Single-Chip Cloud Computer (SCC) as well as Intel’s Core i7 multicore processor. We show that the 48-core SCC is more efficient than the latest generation Core i7, achieving a speedup factor of 42 (efficiency of 0.9), making many-core processors an exciting emerging technology for large-scale structural proteomics. We compare and contrast the performance of the two processors on several datasets and also show that MCPSC outperforms its component methods in grouping related domains, achieving a high F-measure of 0.91 on the benchmark CK34 dataset. The software implementation for protein structure comparison using the three methods and combined MCPSC, along with the developed underlying rckskel algorithmic skeletons library, is available via GitHub.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/563674 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Anuj Sharma Elias S. Manolakos |
spellingShingle |
Anuj Sharma Elias S. Manolakos Efficient Multicriteria Protein Structure Comparison on Modern Processor Architectures BioMed Research International |
author_facet |
Anuj Sharma Elias S. Manolakos |
author_sort |
Anuj Sharma |
title |
Efficient Multicriteria Protein Structure Comparison on Modern Processor Architectures |
title_short |
Efficient Multicriteria Protein Structure Comparison on Modern Processor Architectures |
title_full |
Efficient Multicriteria Protein Structure Comparison on Modern Processor Architectures |
title_fullStr |
Efficient Multicriteria Protein Structure Comparison on Modern Processor Architectures |
title_full_unstemmed |
Efficient Multicriteria Protein Structure Comparison on Modern Processor Architectures |
title_sort |
efficient multicriteria protein structure comparison on modern processor architectures |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
BioMed Research International |
issn |
2314-6133 2314-6141 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
Fast increasing computational demand for all-to-all protein structures comparison (PSC) is a result of three confounding factors: rapidly expanding structural proteomics databases, high computational complexity of pairwise protein comparison algorithms, and the trend in the domain towards using multiple criteria for protein structures comparison (MCPSC) and combining results. We have developed a software framework that exploits many-core and multicore CPUs to implement efficient parallel MCPSC in modern processors based on three popular PSC methods, namely, TMalign, CE, and USM. We evaluate and compare the performance and efficiency of the two parallel MCPSC implementations using Intel’s experimental many-core Single-Chip Cloud Computer (SCC) as well as Intel’s Core i7 multicore processor. We show that the 48-core SCC is more efficient than the latest generation Core i7, achieving a speedup factor of 42 (efficiency of 0.9), making many-core processors an exciting emerging technology for large-scale structural proteomics. We compare and contrast the performance of the two processors on several datasets and also show that MCPSC outperforms its component methods in grouping related domains, achieving a high
F-measure of 0.91 on the benchmark CK34 dataset. The software implementation for protein structure comparison using the three methods and combined MCPSC, along with the developed underlying rckskel algorithmic skeletons library, is available via GitHub. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/563674 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT anujsharma efficientmulticriteriaproteinstructurecomparisononmodernprocessorarchitectures AT eliassmanolakos efficientmulticriteriaproteinstructurecomparisononmodernprocessorarchitectures |
_version_ |
1716758293983002624 |