Power, Dangers and Resources of Forgery, from Theory to Novels
The subject of this contribution concerns the evolution of Eco’s thought on the problem of the false, from the first writings (in which the sign is just what can be used to lie) to the reflections of the late 1980s on the strength of the false, in a more culturological perspective. The essay will th...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Rosenberg & Sellier
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Rivista di Estetica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/7690 |
id |
doaj-ef7fb2e880bb44e382db34791a1e0d65 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ef7fb2e880bb44e382db34791a1e0d652021-07-08T16:38:40ZengRosenberg & SellierRivista di Estetica0035-62122421-58642021-04-01769511210.4000/estetica.7690Power, Dangers and Resources of Forgery, from Theory to NovelsAnna Maria LorussoThe subject of this contribution concerns the evolution of Eco’s thought on the problem of the false, from the first writings (in which the sign is just what can be used to lie) to the reflections of the late 1980s on the strength of the false, in a more culturological perspective. The essay will therefore trace an evolution that establishes in Eco’s theory a continuity between reflection on falsehood, reflection on falsification and the theory of fiction, while in a second time it will retrace all of Eco’s narrative going to highlight how all novels have to do with the false, or at least with the non-verifiability of the true. From this point of view, it will be argued that novels are the best place for Eco to affirm the strength of the false, for the nomothetic power of fictions.http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/7690Umberto EcoSemioticsFalseInterpretation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Anna Maria Lorusso |
spellingShingle |
Anna Maria Lorusso Power, Dangers and Resources of Forgery, from Theory to Novels Rivista di Estetica Umberto Eco Semiotics False Interpretation |
author_facet |
Anna Maria Lorusso |
author_sort |
Anna Maria Lorusso |
title |
Power, Dangers and Resources of Forgery, from Theory to Novels |
title_short |
Power, Dangers and Resources of Forgery, from Theory to Novels |
title_full |
Power, Dangers and Resources of Forgery, from Theory to Novels |
title_fullStr |
Power, Dangers and Resources of Forgery, from Theory to Novels |
title_full_unstemmed |
Power, Dangers and Resources of Forgery, from Theory to Novels |
title_sort |
power, dangers and resources of forgery, from theory to novels |
publisher |
Rosenberg & Sellier |
series |
Rivista di Estetica |
issn |
0035-6212 2421-5864 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
The subject of this contribution concerns the evolution of Eco’s thought on the problem of the false, from the first writings (in which the sign is just what can be used to lie) to the reflections of the late 1980s on the strength of the false, in a more culturological perspective. The essay will therefore trace an evolution that establishes in Eco’s theory a continuity between reflection on falsehood, reflection on falsification and the theory of fiction, while in a second time it will retrace all of Eco’s narrative going to highlight how all novels have to do with the false, or at least with the non-verifiability of the true. From this point of view, it will be argued that novels are the best place for Eco to affirm the strength of the false, for the nomothetic power of fictions. |
topic |
Umberto Eco Semiotics False Interpretation |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/7690 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT annamarialorusso powerdangersandresourcesofforgeryfromtheorytonovels |
_version_ |
1721313051017216000 |