Who We Are Is What We Believe? Religion and Collective Identity in Austrian and German Immigrant Integration Policies

Immigrant integration is a contested policy field in which boundaries of membership are drawn and re-negotiated whereby groups of immigrants are partially included and excluded. Building on the concept of collective identity and theories of boundary making, this paper illustrates how religion functi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Astrid Mattes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2017-03-01
Series:Social Inclusion
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/766
id doaj-ef4c9bc3246540a9ae685ccc52e049ea
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ef4c9bc3246540a9ae685ccc52e049ea2020-11-24T23:49:30ZengCogitatioSocial Inclusion2183-28032017-03-01519310410.17645/si.v5i1.766466Who We Are Is What We Believe? Religion and Collective Identity in Austrian and German Immigrant Integration PoliciesAstrid Mattes0Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, AustriaImmigrant integration is a contested policy field in which boundaries of membership are drawn and re-negotiated whereby groups of immigrants are partially included and excluded. Building on the concept of collective identity and theories of boundary making, this paper illustrates how religion functions as a category to mark and fill notions of self and otherness. As several studies have shown, immigrants in Europe are increasingly addressed as Muslims, a development that also serves the promotion of a Christian ‘us’. Focusing on Austria and Germany, two countries where this is especially observable, the paper outlines the functioning of religion as symbolic boundary. The empirical study on national integration policies demonstrates how—within the relational process of boundary drawing against Muslims—a Christian identity narrative is established, how it functions as a marker of unity and how it relates to liberal and secular notions. Results from the qualitative content analysis of governmental policy programs from 2005 onwards show different patterns of boundary drawing on religion and the way they shape and limit the possibilities of inclusion. To understand this development, we have to look at Christian-democratic policy-makers, who currently dominate the political struggle for the power to define features of collective identity in immigrant integration policies.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/766boundary makingcollective identityChristian-democratsimmigrant integrationIslamreligion
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Astrid Mattes
spellingShingle Astrid Mattes
Who We Are Is What We Believe? Religion and Collective Identity in Austrian and German Immigrant Integration Policies
Social Inclusion
boundary making
collective identity
Christian-democrats
immigrant integration
Islam
religion
author_facet Astrid Mattes
author_sort Astrid Mattes
title Who We Are Is What We Believe? Religion and Collective Identity in Austrian and German Immigrant Integration Policies
title_short Who We Are Is What We Believe? Religion and Collective Identity in Austrian and German Immigrant Integration Policies
title_full Who We Are Is What We Believe? Religion and Collective Identity in Austrian and German Immigrant Integration Policies
title_fullStr Who We Are Is What We Believe? Religion and Collective Identity in Austrian and German Immigrant Integration Policies
title_full_unstemmed Who We Are Is What We Believe? Religion and Collective Identity in Austrian and German Immigrant Integration Policies
title_sort who we are is what we believe? religion and collective identity in austrian and german immigrant integration policies
publisher Cogitatio
series Social Inclusion
issn 2183-2803
publishDate 2017-03-01
description Immigrant integration is a contested policy field in which boundaries of membership are drawn and re-negotiated whereby groups of immigrants are partially included and excluded. Building on the concept of collective identity and theories of boundary making, this paper illustrates how religion functions as a category to mark and fill notions of self and otherness. As several studies have shown, immigrants in Europe are increasingly addressed as Muslims, a development that also serves the promotion of a Christian ‘us’. Focusing on Austria and Germany, two countries where this is especially observable, the paper outlines the functioning of religion as symbolic boundary. The empirical study on national integration policies demonstrates how—within the relational process of boundary drawing against Muslims—a Christian identity narrative is established, how it functions as a marker of unity and how it relates to liberal and secular notions. Results from the qualitative content analysis of governmental policy programs from 2005 onwards show different patterns of boundary drawing on religion and the way they shape and limit the possibilities of inclusion. To understand this development, we have to look at Christian-democratic policy-makers, who currently dominate the political struggle for the power to define features of collective identity in immigrant integration policies.
topic boundary making
collective identity
Christian-democrats
immigrant integration
Islam
religion
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/766
work_keys_str_mv AT astridmattes whoweareiswhatwebelievereligionandcollectiveidentityinaustrianandgermanimmigrantintegrationpolicies
_version_ 1725482208417808384