Public Sector Workers’ Mental Health in Argentina: Comparative Psychometrics of the Perceived Stress Scale

Objectives Given that Argentinian public-sector workers are highly exposed to stressful conditions, and that the psychometric properties of the widely used Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) should be evaluated in different settings, this work aimed to compare the psychometric properties of the Latin Amer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Agustín Ramiro Miranda, Ana Veronica Scotta, Ana Lucía Méndez, Silvana Valeria Serra, Elio Andrés Soria
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society for Preventive Medicine 2020-11-01
Series:Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jpmph.org/upload/pdf/jpmph-20-229.pdf
id doaj-ef46390cbd374f439572b6e490be5278
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ef46390cbd374f439572b6e490be52782020-12-10T00:00:18ZengKorean Society for Preventive MedicineJournal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health1975-83752233-45212020-11-0153642943810.3961/jpmph.20.2292114Public Sector Workers’ Mental Health in Argentina: Comparative Psychometrics of the Perceived Stress ScaleAgustín Ramiro Miranda0Ana Veronica Scotta1Ana Lucía Méndez2Silvana Valeria Serra3Elio Andrés Soria4 School of Phonoaudiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, National University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina School of Phonoaudiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, National University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina School of Phonoaudiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, National University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina School of Phonoaudiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, National University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina National Scientific and Technical Research Council, CONICET, INICSA, Córdoba, ArgentinaObjectives Given that Argentinian public-sector workers are highly exposed to stressful conditions, and that the psychometric properties of the widely used Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) should be evaluated in different settings, this work aimed to compare the psychometric properties of the Latin American Spanish PSS-10 and PSS-4 and to identify the optimal scale for stress assessment. Methods A sample of 535 participants was randomly divided into 2 groups to evaluate dimensionality by exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The reliability of both scales was also evaluated. Convergent validity was estimated using the Executive Complaints Questionnaire, the average variance extracted, and the composite reliability. Discriminant validity was based on the correlation with the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale and the phi-square correlation between the components. Results The factor analyses supported bidimensionality of the PSS-10 (stress and coping), which showed a better fit than the PSS-4. Moreover, the reliability of the PSS-10 was higher, whereas the PSS-4 did not achieve adequate values of internal consistency. The PSS-10 was also correlated significantly with all validation scales, and presented proper internal convergent and divergent validity. Conclusions The PSS-10 is a reliable and structurally valid instrument to measure perceived stress and coping in a Latin American Spanish-speaking population with high work demands, and the findings of this study expand our knowledge on the geographical and sociocultural applicability of the PSS.http://www.jpmph.org/upload/pdf/jpmph-20-229.pdfpsychometricspsychological distresspsychiatric status rating scalesself-assessmentoccupational health
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Agustín Ramiro Miranda
Ana Veronica Scotta
Ana Lucía Méndez
Silvana Valeria Serra
Elio Andrés Soria
spellingShingle Agustín Ramiro Miranda
Ana Veronica Scotta
Ana Lucía Méndez
Silvana Valeria Serra
Elio Andrés Soria
Public Sector Workers’ Mental Health in Argentina: Comparative Psychometrics of the Perceived Stress Scale
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
psychometrics
psychological distress
psychiatric status rating scales
self-assessment
occupational health
author_facet Agustín Ramiro Miranda
Ana Veronica Scotta
Ana Lucía Méndez
Silvana Valeria Serra
Elio Andrés Soria
author_sort Agustín Ramiro Miranda
title Public Sector Workers’ Mental Health in Argentina: Comparative Psychometrics of the Perceived Stress Scale
title_short Public Sector Workers’ Mental Health in Argentina: Comparative Psychometrics of the Perceived Stress Scale
title_full Public Sector Workers’ Mental Health in Argentina: Comparative Psychometrics of the Perceived Stress Scale
title_fullStr Public Sector Workers’ Mental Health in Argentina: Comparative Psychometrics of the Perceived Stress Scale
title_full_unstemmed Public Sector Workers’ Mental Health in Argentina: Comparative Psychometrics of the Perceived Stress Scale
title_sort public sector workers’ mental health in argentina: comparative psychometrics of the perceived stress scale
publisher Korean Society for Preventive Medicine
series Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
issn 1975-8375
2233-4521
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Objectives Given that Argentinian public-sector workers are highly exposed to stressful conditions, and that the psychometric properties of the widely used Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) should be evaluated in different settings, this work aimed to compare the psychometric properties of the Latin American Spanish PSS-10 and PSS-4 and to identify the optimal scale for stress assessment. Methods A sample of 535 participants was randomly divided into 2 groups to evaluate dimensionality by exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The reliability of both scales was also evaluated. Convergent validity was estimated using the Executive Complaints Questionnaire, the average variance extracted, and the composite reliability. Discriminant validity was based on the correlation with the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale and the phi-square correlation between the components. Results The factor analyses supported bidimensionality of the PSS-10 (stress and coping), which showed a better fit than the PSS-4. Moreover, the reliability of the PSS-10 was higher, whereas the PSS-4 did not achieve adequate values of internal consistency. The PSS-10 was also correlated significantly with all validation scales, and presented proper internal convergent and divergent validity. Conclusions The PSS-10 is a reliable and structurally valid instrument to measure perceived stress and coping in a Latin American Spanish-speaking population with high work demands, and the findings of this study expand our knowledge on the geographical and sociocultural applicability of the PSS.
topic psychometrics
psychological distress
psychiatric status rating scales
self-assessment
occupational health
url http://www.jpmph.org/upload/pdf/jpmph-20-229.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT agustinramiromiranda publicsectorworkersmentalhealthinargentinacomparativepsychometricsoftheperceivedstressscale
AT anaveronicascotta publicsectorworkersmentalhealthinargentinacomparativepsychometricsoftheperceivedstressscale
AT analuciamendez publicsectorworkersmentalhealthinargentinacomparativepsychometricsoftheperceivedstressscale
AT silvanavaleriaserra publicsectorworkersmentalhealthinargentinacomparativepsychometricsoftheperceivedstressscale
AT elioandressoria publicsectorworkersmentalhealthinargentinacomparativepsychometricsoftheperceivedstressscale
_version_ 1724388028600811520